The morality of abortion, access
to abortion, biases, & definitions
Sponsored link
About the morality of, and access to, abortion:
There are two main questions concerning abortion:
Whether a decision to have an abortion is moral for an individual woman, given her
specific situation. This might include consideration of her religious beliefs, age, marital
status, health, economic status, available support systems, genetic makeup, etc.
If, after a woman has consulted with her physician and perhaps
her spiritual advisor and has decided to seek an abortion, whether the
government should veto her decision.
The first question is a very personal decision. The second
question generates intense levels of debate and occasional violence,
particularly in the U.S. The abortion controversy continues, but at a much lower
level, in Canada.
There are two many answers to the question of
abortion access. They can be grouped into two basic positions:
Those promoting a pro-life or anti-abortion position say that the
government should override a woman's decision to have an abortion in some, many, or all cases, and require her to continue
her pregnancy to childbirth.
Most pro-lifers base their stance on the belief that human life, in the form of
an ovum and spermatozoon, becomes a human person during the process of conception.
Thus, a human pre-embryo, embryo and fetus are all persons entitled to
fundamental human rights,
including the most basic right: to be allowed to live. The lives of two
humans are being considered here: that of the woman and her the life of the pre-embryo, embryo, or
fetus.
Those promoting a pro-choice position say that the
government should not interfere with the woman's decision, or should do so only
under very rare circumstances. She should be able to have
an abortion in many, most or all cases.
Most pro-choicers base their stance on the belief that human life becomes a human person at some time after conception --
perhaps when the embryo's heart starts beating, or when the fetus first looks human, or
it becomes sentient, or it has half
emerged from its mother's body, or is born, or is
severed from its mother and is functioning independently. They feel that a woman
should not be forced to go through a pregnancy and childbirth if she does not
choose to do so. She should be allowed to have an abortion if it is
done before her embryo or fetus attains personhood.
It is important to realize that both the pro-life, anti-abortion and pro-choice
positions cover a range of individual beliefs and advocacy. Most of the media are wrong:
there is no single pro-life/anti-abortion
position and no single pro-choice position.
Essentially all other web sites reflect the position of the webmaster or sponsoring agency. This web site is different. We attempt to present a balanced picture of all
aspects of and all views on abortion.
Because of this, you will probably find some parts
of our essays infuriating even as you will affirm the accuracy of other parts.
About biases:
Almost all websites on the Internet that discuss abortion are
either strongly pro-life/anti-abortion or pro-choice. Some are seriously lacking in
objectivity and accuracy. Some distort data; others ignore information that
contradicts their views.
This web site is maintained by an multifaith group. Our staff
have different but strongly held beliefs concerning the morality of abortion and whether it
should be available to women in specific cases. They have a range of beliefs
concerning when human life becomes a human person.
We try to present all sides to
each topic clearly, completely,
objectively and accurately. 2
If you feel that we have missed our goal in any of our abortion
essays,
please E-mail us, and include both the file name (e.g. abortion.htm) and
your specific concern. However, if you merely object to having all viewpoints explained
on this site, please don't write us. This
section of our web site generates a lot of Emails containing raw hatred and
we would prefer to not receive more of that type. Please direct your hatred to
pro-choice or pro-life web sites.
About definitions:
Various groups define pregnancy and abortion-related terms
differently. This can make dialogue and even elementary communication very
difficult.
Physicians, medical researchers, and most pro-choice groups and
mainline or liberal religious groups often define words differently.
In this series of essays, we will generally use the medical
definitions, because they are in widest use.
Three key terms used throughout this section are:
Human life: This is "any living cell or collection of
living cells that contains
DNA from the species homo sapiens." 1 This includes an ovum,
a spermatozoon, zygote, embryo, fetus, newborn, infant, child, youth, adult, and
elder. It also includes a breast cancer cell, a
living hair follicle, and a recent skin scraping. Some forms of human life, like an individual ovum
or spermatozoon, are rarely considered to be of value, except by couples having
difficulty conceiving. Other forms of human life, like a newborn, infant,
or adult are priceless; medical professionals go to great lengths to preserve their life.
Human person: A human life that is granted civil rights, including the right to live.
People have different opinions about the point at which human life becomes a
human person. There is a societal consensus that a newborn is a human person.
However, people disagree about whether a zygote, embryo, or fetus is also a human person.
This is the main point of disagreement that causes conflicts over abortion
access.
Start of pregnancy: Pro-lifers typically define pregnancy as starting at conception.
Pro-choicers and the medical profession usually define it as starting when the zygote is fully implanted in the wall of the
uterus. We use the medical definition in this section.
Abortion: We define abortion as the "purposeful termination of
pregnancy with intention other than to produce a live born infant or to
remove a dead fetus." 3 This is one of
many conflicting definitions in common use.
It is important to realize that when one group defines something differently from another group, this does not make one group clueless, ignorant. backwards, etc. They are simply two groups using differing definitions. This happens often in areas where religion impacts people's sexual behavior, as in abortion access, rights of persons with a minority sexual orientation or gender identity, access to marriage, etc.
Disclaimer:
This, and similar medical information on our web site, is intended as a
general educational aid to the public. If the topics covered are of direct
concern to you, we recommend that you consult a qualified healthcare
professional who can review your unique situation before offering an opinion.
Sponsored link
Three footnotes:
We use the popular meaning of "life" here to include ova and
spermatozoa. Some scientists use a very strict definition of the word "life"...
which does not include ova and spermatozoa because they cannot, by themselves,
reproduce.