"We have enormous protections, the best by far, but we're never going
to have a system that will never execute an innocent person." Statement
by the Chairperson of the Judiciary Committee of the US House of Representatives
in support of the death penalty in 1997.
What is at stake:
Both pro-death penalty and anti-death penalty advocates share one belief:
Proving that the state executed an innocent person would significantly reduce
public acceptance of the death penalty.
How many of the approximately 7,000 people executed in the U.S. during the
20th century were innocent? Nobody knows.
A "smoking gun" -- a case of an
innocent person having been executed -- has not yet been proven to everyone's
satisfaction. The best chance
of finding a "smoking gun" might be to compare crime scene evidence to the DNA
of a person who has already been executed. Unfortunately, such samples are not easily
obtained.
"Missouri death sentence case gets another look. If innocence of
executed man is proven, case would set a precedent," MSNBC, 2005-AUG-05,
at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/
"New York State legislative committee defeats death penalty,"
Equal Justice USA, 2005-APR-12, at:
http://www.quixote.org/
Claudia Whitman, et al., "Reasonable Doubts: Is the U.S. Executing
Innocent People? A Preliminary Report of the Grassroots Investigation
Project," Equal Justice USA, 2000-OCT-26, at:
http://www.quixote.org/ The full report in PDF format is at:
http://www.quixote.org/ This is a PDF file. You may require software to read it. Software can be obtained free from:
"Fatal Flaw: Innocence and the death penalty in the USA," Amnesty
International, at:
http://web.amnesty.org/
Hugo Adam Bedau and Michael L. Radelet, "Miscarriages of Justice in
Potentially Capital Cases," Stanford Law Review 1987.