Margin of error:IF the subjects in this test were
selected at random, then we could compute the margin of error in the
study. "The margin of error in a [randomly selected] sample = 1
divided by the square root of the number of people in the
sample." Thus, with 75 responses, the margin of error would
have been 1/
75 exp -0.5 = .115 = 11.5%.1,2 This means an
individual datum would have been accurate to within 11.5%, 19 times out of 20.
Thus, if the poll had been taken from a random sample of adults and were repeated 20 times, with the same number of
contributors, a given value would be within 11.5% of the original
value, for 19 of the 20 repeats. However, the subjects were
self-selected. Although their beliefs covered a wide range. they could
not be considered a random sample. So the margin of error calculation is
relatively meaningless.
Religious makeup: 40 (53%) identified themselves as
Christians; 10 (13%) were Wiccan; 3 (4%) Atheists; 2 (3%) Agnostics;
20 were NOTAa (none of the above). Christians were somewhat under-represented and Wiccans were
greatly over-represented when compared to the general population. This is to
be expected because of the religious profile of
visitors to this web site.
Wing: 40 (53%) rated themselves as religiously liberal; 23 (31%) as
conservative; 6 (8%) as mainline; 6 (8%) did not answer the question.
Liberals were over-represented; conservatives and mainliners were
under-represented.
Assessed the will of God?: 51 (68%) felt that they had probably assessed the will of God;
19 (25%) felt that they were unsuccessful; 5 (7%) did not respond.
Initial belief about same-sex marriage:
49 (65%) of the subjects favored SSM.
26 (35%) of the subjects opposed SSM.
Everyone had an opinion.
Even though they had conflicting opinions,
every participant found that God agreed
with their initial belief!
How certain were they? Of the 50 (67%) subjects who felt that they had assessed the will of God,
most were confident that they had done so correctly. 33 (66%) were
certain; 10 (20%) were very sure; only 7 (14%) were fairly sure, somewhat sure, or
not sure at all.
Divisions by wing:
Among the 40 religious liberals, all but 3 (7%) favored SSM.
Among the 23 religious conservatives, all but 3 (13%) opposed
SSM.
Among this latter group of 3, one is gay and one is bisexual.
Among the 20 heterosexual conservative Christians, all opposed SSM.
Division by sexual orientation:
11 (15%) of the subjects were bisexual.
7 (9%) were gay or lesbian.
58 (77%) were heterosexual.
If one assumes that about 5% of the population has a homosexual
orientation and that 3% are bisexual, then gays, lesbians and bisexuals were over-represented in the study.
The most significant result, in the author's opinion, is that:
Those who personally favored SSM found that God
also favored it.
Those who personally opposed SSM found that God
also opposes it.
God did not disagree with any of the participants' beliefs,
even though they are in conflict.
With few exceptions:
Religious liberals favor SSM.
Religious conservatives oppose SSM.
With no exceptions:
Heterosexual conservative Christians oppose SSM.
The main finding:
Although the sample size was small, one result was striking: Of the 68% of the participants who
believed that they assessed the will of God, every
person found that God agreed
with their stance on SSM:
All of those who are personally opposed to SSM reported that God agreed with
them.
All of those favoring SSM also reported that God agreed with them.
None found that God took a compromise position, saying that God
supported or opposed SSM depending upon the specifics of each
individual case.
