Same-sex marriages

Menu

Same-sex marriage (SSM) in Iowa

Sponsored link.

Quotations:

	"If marriage means everything, it means absolutely nothing." Dr. James C. Dobson, of Focus on the Family.
	"A loving man and woman in a committed relationship can marry. Dogs, no matter what their relationship, are not allowed to marry. How should society treat gays and lesbians in committed relationships? As dogs or as humans?" A posting to an Internet mailing list; used by permission of the author.

Status:

The Associated Press reported that:

"Iowa has a history of being in the forefront on social issues. It was among the first states to legalize interracial marriage and to allow married women to own property. It was also the first state to admit a woman to the bar to practice law and was a leader in school desegregation." ₁

On 2009-APR-03, the seven justices on the Iowa Supreme Court continued this civil rights heritage when they unanimously determined that the state's ban on same-sex marriage (SSM) was unconstitutional because it violated the equal protection clause of the Iowa constitution. This clause is present in many state constitutions and in the U.S. Constitution. It requires governments to treat people equally, as far as possible.

Same-sex marriages began very quickly after the ruling.

A poll taken by the University of Iowa just before the court ruling sampled Iowans' opinion on the recognition of same-sex relationships: whether they should be allowed to marry, given the option of a civil union with the benefits of marriage without the name, or be treated only as roommates. Results indicated that most Iowans supported either same-sex marriage or civil unions. But only 26% support same-sex marriage. A similar poll asking adults in the states whether they were for or against SSM would probably have been about 10 percentage points or more higher.

A meta-study was published in a paper by Jeffrey Lax and Justin Phillips of Columbia University. It analyzed each of the polls for all 50 states and shows the increase in percentage support for SSM. In Iowa, support was:

• 24% during 1994-1996
• 32% during 2003-2004
• 38% during 2008-2009

Support is increasing at about 1 percentage point a year. This is a fairly typical rate for major civil rights matters:

• Support for SSM in other states is increasing at about the same rate as it is in Iowa.
• Support for interracial marriages increased at about this rate during the late 20th century.

It will probably take until about 2020 before most adults in the state support SSM.

On Monday, 2009-APR-27, same-sex couples across the state began obtaining marriage licenses in their county recorder offices. Some obtained judicial waiver of the normal three-day waiting period and were able to marry immediately.

On election day of 2010-NOV-02, three of the seven justices on the state Supreme Court were on the ballot for retention. All were rejected by the voters. This is the first time since 1962 that an Iowa Supreme Court justice has been rejected. ₃

A constitutional revision has been proposed for the 2014-NOV ballot. It is being publicized as an amendment that will prohibit future same-sex marriages and forcibly divorce currently married same-sex couples against their will. However, Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal (D) has vowed to never allow this constitutional amendment to be debated in the Senate.

It appears to be a stealth amendment in that its wording would do much more than terminate same-sex marriage in Iowa. It would also prevent the legislature from creating civil unions in the future -- a provision of which most voters in the state approve. Finally it would seem to prevent the establishment of domestic partnerships, and forcibly terminate common law marriages in the state.

Topics covered in this section:

• Background of same-sex marriage in Iowa
  
  
• The Polk County District Court court case
  
  
• The District Court ruling
  
  
• Reactions to the District Court ruling; subsequent developments
  
  
• Appeal to the state Supreme Court
  
  
• The Supreme Court ruling
  
  
• Reactions during 2009:
  • By those opposed to marriage equality
    
    • More opposition
      
      
  • By those supporting marriage equality
    
    
• 2010: A hate Email to us. Reaction by the voters on election day
  
  
• 2010: Proposing a constitutional amendment. Reactions to the Supreme Court decision.
  
  
• Legislative activity to create a Constitutional Amendment:
  • 2011: Amendment proposed. Would it pass? Family Leader tour.
    
    
  • 2011-JAN: House/Senate activity
    
    
  • 2011-FEB to now: House/Senate activity
    

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above menu. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

1. Amy Lorentzen, "Iowa Court Ruling Legalizes Gay Marriage," Associated Press, 2009-APR-05, at: http://news.aol.com/
2. Amy Lorentzen, "Same-sex couples begin tying the knot in Iowa," Associated Press, 2009-APR-27, at: http://news.yahoo.com/
3. Michael Foust, "Gay marriage loses big on election night," Baptist Press, 2010-NOV-03, at: http://www.bpnews.net/

Copyright © 2007 to 2011 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally written: 2007-AUG-30
Latest update: 2011-NOV-10
Author: B.A. Robinson

Sponsored link

Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Page Translator: This page translator works on Firefox, Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only After translating, click on the "show original" button at the top of this page to restore page to English.