This is an invasive procedure that is usually performed on "inter-sex"
newborns for what some believe to be medical reasons. These are newborns whose
genitals deviate significantly from conventional male or female design.
Western society has traditionally oppressed sexual minorities. Every child is expected
to be conceived with XX or XY chromosomes, grow up to be either a man or a woman, to have
internal and external sexual organs which are clearly male or female, and to be sexually
attracted to members of the "opposite" sex when they mature. For reasons of
ignorance, religious teaching and fear, we have tended to force people into the
traditional heterosexual male or female role. But, as in so many sexually related topics,
a two-mode model is insufficient. Consider:
Homosexuals: male or female adults who are attracted to members of the same
gender; about 5% of the population
Bisexuals: male or female adults who are attracted to persons of both/all genders;
about 3% of the population.
Transgendered persons: adults who
appear like a typical male or female, but who are convinced that nature has
played a terrible trick on them. They feel that they are a woman in a man's
body, or vice versa. Their numbers are unknown. Estimates vary widely.
Transexuals: Transgendered adults who have undergone hormone
therapy and/or surgical procedures in order to make their body more
closely resemble the sex that they identify themselves as.
Intersexuals: individuals who are born with anatomy or physiology which differ
from cultural ideals of male and female."1
About Anne Fausto-Sterling:
Anne Fausto-Sterling attempted to categorize intersexuality in a 1993 article.
2
She introduced three sexes in addition to male and female:
Herm refers to "true hermaphrodite" -- a person born with
both ovarian and testicular tissues and internal reproductive organs.
Merm is an intersexed person with a XY (nominally male) karyotype.
Ferm is an intersexed person with a XX (nominally female) karyotype.
These categories have not been well received by most intersexed people.
She has written of her vision of a more accepting future:
"At birth, instead of hearing the inevitable pronouncement of "boy"
or "girl" new parents might excitedly await a much expanded range of
possibilities. Herms, ferms, and merms, being the rarer birth events might come to be seen
as especially blessed or lucky, having as they do the best of all possible worlds,
sexually speaking. Herms, merms and ferms might become the most desirable of all possible
mates able as they are to pleasure their partners in a variety of ways. Furthermore, the
existence of three additional sexes would open up possibilities for the rest of us. It
would become difficult to maintain a clear conceptualization of homosexuality, for
example, and perhaps its current contentious status would fade from view. If we envision
the world in fives instead of twos, it would also be more difficult to hold onto rigid
constructions of male and female sex roles. ...Should we have only two sexes?--my answer
would be a resounding no."
About Dr. John Money:
John William Money (1921-2006) was a psychologist and sexologist at Johns
Hopkins University in Baltimore, MD. According to Wikipedia, he was:
"... well-known for his research into sexual identity and biology of
gender. Money identified several influential concepts and terms during his
career, including gender identity, gender role, gender-identity/role, and
lovemap." 14
He was very highly regarded as a world-class expert in his field. He received
many international awards.
One of his early specialties was intersexuality. He
developed the concept that a person's gender is not simply defined by their
genitalia, but also by one's self-awareness and social assignment. He taught
that gender among very young children is plastic, and only becomes rigid later in
life. In a very famous case, in 1965, he persuaded a family
to have one of their twin sons castrated and raised as a girl.
Infant genital surgery:
Partly as a result of his research, many physicians began recommending that the ambiguous external genitals of intersex infants be
surgically modified so that the child will grow up appearing to be a
"normal" male or female. Some the infant have an enlarged or protruding
clitoris; others will be born with a "micropenis".
In about 90% of cases, intersex infants have undergone genital surgery to make them appear as a "normal"
female. One surgeon explained: "You can make a hole, but you can't build a
pole."3 Surgery involves removal and
remolding genital structures, and may involve the addition of parts taken from
elsewhere on the body.
Physicians now attempt to preserve structures that have concentrations of
nerves, so that sexual feeling will remain. But they cannot guarantee that their
patients will ever be able to have orgasms in later life. Such care was not
always done in the past.
These operations are usually performed shortly after birth, at the age of 6 weeks to 15
months. 6 They are sometimes done later, during childhood or
teen years.
Intersexual activist groups:
There is increasing opposition to these operations. Several activist and
support groups by and for intersexuals have been formed. 1,4,5
They generally oppose genital surgery on intersexed people, particularly when it is done
at an age where the individual cannot make an informed choice. Nathalie Angier
6
has written:
"The debate raises difficult questions about who has the right to
decide what ranks as esthetically acceptable genitalia, whose interests are
being served by surgical intervention and whether one's sexual identity is
so entwined with the appearance of one's genitals that it is worth
subjecting infants to a major operation to assure visual concordance between
one and the other."
The Federal Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act does permit genital
surgery if it is "necessary to the health of the person on whom it is
performed." Activists are now trying to modify the law, so that it cannot
be performed without the informed consent of the individual. Cheryl Chase, founder of the Intersex Society of North
America commented: 1
"Africans have their cultural reasons for trimming girls'
clitorises, and we have our cultural reasons for trimming girls' clitorises.
It's a lot easier to see what's irrational in another culture than it is to
see it in our own."
With regard to the proposed change in the law, she
commented: "
"That would break the pediatricians' argument that they do this to
prevent psychological and mental trauma for the child...We don't expect this to be
finished up in six months, but we're not going to go away, and we have more passion than
they do."
Some pediatricians defend the practice of infant genital surgery. Dr. Anthony A.
Caldamone, head of pediatric urology at Hasbro Children's Hospital in Providence, RI said:
"I don't think it's an option for nothing to be done. I don't
think parents can be told, this is a normal girl, and then have to be faced
with what looks like an enlarged clitoris, or a penis, every time they
change the diaper. We try to normalize the genitals to the gender to reduce
psychosocial and functional problems later in life."
Dr. Justine M. Schober, a pediatric urologist at Hamot Medical Center in Erie, Pa. has
said:
"The truth is, genital surgery is being done, but we don't know
what the outcome of it is, sexually or otherwise. We don't have any
long-term studies."
David Thomas, a pediatric urologist at St. James's University Hospital and Infirmary in
Leeds, UK conducted a scouting study. It involved only about a dozen intersexual
individuals aged 11 to 15 who had been subjected to genital surgery. Results were not
encouraging. 7 Dr. Thomas reports: "
"Every girl
required some additional vaginal surgery...The results are indifferent and frankly
disappointing."
Estimates on the number of intersexuals in North America range from 1 in 50 to 1 in
1000. Intersexuality is sometimes caused by their DNA, sometimes by rare hormonal levels
during pregnancy, and sometimes by unknown causes.
One would hope that the unique challenges faced by intersexual individuals could be
handled through an interaction of intersexuals, their families, physicians and other
health professionals. Unfortunately, some
conservative Christians have introduced religious objections to intersexuality, based on what they
believe are literal interpretations of scripture. Some examples are listed
below, along with responses from some liberal Christians and intersexed persons:
Genesis 1:27 states: "God created man in his own image...male and female
he created them." (NIV)
Many Conservative Christians interpret the verse (and similar Biblical passages)
literally, and believe that there can be only two genders: male and female. If there were
intersexual peoples, then God would have mentioned them. Thus, they reject the concept of
gender as a continuum, with three or more varieties of intersexual genders.
One intersexual individual 8 cites an ancient Jewish
tradition "that Adam was an hermaphrodite."
Many Liberal Christian
theologians interpret Genesis 1:27 to refer to God's original creation of Adam and Eve as male and female. It
would not necessarly refer to their descendants, who would have been male, female and intersexual.
Religious liberals usually consider the Old Testament creation story to be a myth, similar
to the creation stories of other religions.
Numbers 5:1-3 states: "The Lord said to Moses: 'Command the Israelites to
send away from the camp anyone who has an infections skin disease or a discharge of any
kind, or who is ceremonially unclean because of [touching] a dead body. Send away male and
female alike; send them outside the camp so that they will not defile their camp, where I
dwell among them.'" (NIV)
Many Conservative theologians point out that the phrase "male and female
alike" is a way of including everyone. Thus, God has implied that there are no
intersexuals.
One intersexual individual pointed out: "The
phrase which tends translated as 'male and female'...reads 'mi-zakhar ve-'ad neqevah', or
'from male to female,' in the original Hebrew. The form 'from A to B' suggests a continuum
of some sort."8 The concept of male and female with three intermediate genders
fits perfectly into the phrase in its original Hebrew. Numbers 5 appears to be
one of many Biblical passages in which translators have created an English text that
discriminates against minorities, even as the original Hebrew text is inclusive of all
gender minorities.
Many liberal theologians interpret this passage in a different way.
The authors of the book of Numbers lived in a pre-scientific age and were unaware of sex
chromosomes, hermaphrodites, intersexuals, and other sexual minorities. They would have
naturally assumed that there were only two genders when they wrote this passages as if it
had been stated by God.
Chuck Colson has written a particularly insensitive attack on intersexuals. He states (in part):
"The Bible teaches that the Fall into sin affected biology itself -
that nature is now marred and distorted from its original perfection. This truth
gives us a basis for fighting evil, for working to alleviate disease and
deformity - including helping those unfortunate children born with genital
deformities."
"...for the Christian, nature is not our basis for determining
normality. Scripture tells us how God created us before the Fall, and how he
intended us to live: as males and females, reflecting His own image. We take our
standards and identity from His revelation of our original nature." 9
One cause of this attack on the reality of intersexuality is the desire by conservative
Christians to delay as long as possible the recognition of gay and
lesbian marriages. One method of continuing special rights for heterosexuals is the US
Federal Defense of Marriage Act. DOMA has two main objectives:
restriction of the definition of "marriage" in federal legislation to unions
between one male and one female,
allowing states to refuse to recognize marriages performed in other states that do not
involve one man and one woman.
If it is shown that there are more than 2 genders, then DOMA could be ruled
unconstitutional. The US Supreme Court has already declared a Colorado amendment to be
unconstitutional because it singled out one group (homosexuals) for legalized
discrimination. DOMA could be interpreted as singling out two groups (homosexuals and
intersexuals) for such discrimination.
Thus, it is important for groups that are opposing same-sex marriage to maintain the
fiction that there are only two genders, that intersexual people do not exist.
It would be unfortunate if the hatred expressed against homosexuality by many conservative
Christians spreads and becomes widely directed against intersexuals.
Anne Fausto-Sterling, "The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female are not enough",
The Sciences, 1993-MAR/APR, 1993:20-24. Responses were printed in the JUL/AUG issue. The
article was reprinted on the New York Times Op-ed page on 1993-MAR-12.
Melissa Hendricks, "Is it a Boy or a Girl?", Johns Hopkins Magazine,
1993-NOV-10 to 16.
Nathalie Angier, New Debate Over Surgery on Genitals, New York Times, New York
NY, 1997-MAY-13
Anne Scheck, "Early Vaginal Reconstruction for All Intersex Girls?,"
Urology Times of Canada, 1997-APR. Available at:
http://www.doctoc.com/
Sally Gross, "Intersexuality and Scripture" at: http://www.qis.net/
(Apparently offline)
Charles Colson, "Blurred biology" is a Fundamentalist Christian attack
on intersexuality. See: http://www.goodnewsmag.com/
Apparently offline
Anne Fausto-Sterling, "The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female are not enough",
The Sciences, 1993-MAR/APR, 1993:20-24. Responses were printed in the JUL/AUG issue. The
article was reprinted on the New York Times Op-ed page on 1993-MAR-12.
Cheryl Chase, "Hermaphrodites with Attitude: Mapping the Emergence of
Intersex Political Activism," GLQ: Journal of Gay and Lesbian Studies 4
(2):189-211 (1998)
A.D. Dreger, "Ethical Issues in the Medical Treatment of Intersexuality
and 'Ambiguous Sex,'" Hastings Center Report. (1998-MAY/JUN)
Suzanne Kessler, "Lessons from the Intersexed," Rutgers
University Press, (1998-AUG)