| About this site |
| About us |
| Our beliefs |
| Is this your first visit? |
| Contact us |
| External links |
| Good books |
| Visitor essays |
| Our forum |
| New essays |
| Other site features |
| Buy a CD of this site |
| Vital notes |
| Non-theistic... |
| Atheism |
| Agnosticism |
| Humanism |
| Other |
| Spirituality and ethics |
| Spirituality |
| Morality and ethics |
| Absolute truth |
| Peace and conflict |
| Attaining peace |
| Religious tolerance |
| Religious hatred |
| Religious conflict |
| Religious violence |
| Laws and news |
| Religious laws |
| Religious news |
|
|
 | The first question is easy to answer: we have a copyright notice near the bottom of each essay which identifies the author. It is usually Bruce A Robinson, our chief author. |
| The second question is more difficult to answer. Credibility of essays and reports is often a problem, particularly on the Internet. This is especially true on extremely controversial topics like abortion access, equal rights for gays and lesbians, the death penalty, corporal punishment of children, physician assisted suicide, etc. In particular, abortion topics are difficult to handle because they often deal with unprovable, religious and philosophical beliefs. Consider the words of Paul Campos: |
"Whether or not abortion should be legal turns on the answer to the question of whether and at what point a fetus is a person. This is a question that cannot be answered logically or empirically. The concept of personhood is neither logical nor empirical: It is essentially a religious, or quasi-religious idea, based on one's fundamental (and therefore unverifiable) assumptions about the nature of the world." 1
Why we feel that our essays are credible:
One reason is that we do not promote a specific
religious point of view. We are a multi-faith group consisting of an
Agnostic, Atheist, Christian, Wiccan and Zen Buddhist. So, even if we wanted to
promote our beliefs, we could not because we do not have a common
position. Instead, we simply report what both or all sides to each topic
believe.
For example, on the topic of Post Abortion Syndrome -- the depression that
some women suffer after an abortion -- pro-life groups' web sites generally
state that this problem is extremely widespread. Pro-choice sites either
ignore the problem or say that PAS is a rare problem. Our site gives what we
feel is an
accurate portrayal:
that it is extremely widespread among those women who believe at the time of
the abortion (or later) that abortion not only kills an embryo or fetus,
but it involves the actual murder of a human person. PAS appears to be quite rare otherwise.
Pro-life web sites often emphasize individual cases of deaths
happening to women who have abortions. Pro-choice sites tend to say that
abortions are extremely safe. We report that deaths do happen, but that they
occur at a lower rate than do maternal deaths during pregnancy and delivery.
Thus, an abortion is safer than a live delivery for the woman. (Of course,
it is not safe for the embryo or fetus; it is killed.)
Finally, our web site's abortion essays contain hyperlinks to both pro-life, pro-choice and medical web sites.
Pro-choice and pro-life web sites are typically biased in that they provide
hyperlinks only to web sites who express beliefs similar to their own.
Reference:
- Paul Campos, "Opinions: PAUL CAMPOS: Abortion and the rule of law ," Scripps Howard News Service, 2002-JAN, at: http://www.nandotimes.com/ This article is no longer online.
|
Home page > "Hot" religious topics > Abortion > here |
Copyright © 2002 to 2007 by Ontario Consultants on
Religious Tolerance
Originally written: 2002-DEC-6
Latest update: 2007-JUN-16
Author: B.A. Robinson
|
|
