Emergency contraception (a.k.a. EC, ECP, "Morning After" Pill)

Does emergency contraception (EC)
reduce or increase the abortion rate?

Sponsored link.

The debate:

Some public health organizations are publicizing the use of emergency contraception (EC). Among those sex-ed classes which do not follow the abstinence-only format, many mention EC it as an option in the case of unprotected sex, rape or contraceptive failure. Many health clinics at high schools and colleges are now publicizing and distributing EC to female students.

"The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has urged its members to offer prescriptions for emergency contraception [in advance of need] during patients' regular checkups." ₁

As is usual in matters relating to abortion, opinions are hopelessly divided on whether ED increases or decreases the number of abortions. Pro-life and conservative Christian groups have conclusions which are totally opposite from those reached by pro-choice groups, religiously liberal groups, and medical organizations.

The conflict will never be resolved until both sides agree on their belief of when pregnancy begins. This is very unlikely in the foreseeable future:

Pro-life view: EC increases abortions:

Family Research Council (FRC) is one of the leading fundamentalist Christian organizations. They frequently describe themselves as being "pro-family." They promote pre-marital abstinence, restrictions on abortion access, and reduced civil rights for gays and lesbians.  In one of their Washington Update reports called "Truth in Labeling," and in an article titled "Little Pills: Targeting Youth with New Abortion Drugs," the FRC describes, correctly, how EC can prevent ovulation, or prevent conception, or prevent implantation of the blastocyst -- an fertilized ovum -- in the uterine wall. _2,3

They indicate that "two percent of women said they used the morning after pill." It is not clear to what group of women they are referring. If we assume that a random sampling of all of the approximately 70 million American women in their of fertile years were involved, then this survey concluded that about 1.4 million women admitted to have taken EC by the time of the survey. Such a poll involves very personal questioning. In all probability, the actual number of users of EC is much higher -- say three million, because many women would be reluctant to discuss such a matter with a stranger. The chance of a pregnancy resulting from unprotected sex ranges from about 1% to 8%, depending upon when in the menstrual cycle the intercourse took place. A commonly accepted average is 2%. Thus, about 60,000 pregnancies were probably impacted by the use of EC. The medication is believed to be about 85% effective. That is, 85% of the pregnancies that would have occurred without the use of Emergency Contraceptive Pills would not have proceeded. Thus, EC has prevented about 50,000 pregnancies from proceeding prior to the survey. This number is expected to increase rapidly as more women become aware of the existence of EC.

Conception can happen a few days after unprotected intercourse. This would give the woman time to take EC and either prevent ovulation or conception. But, in rare instances, conception can occur within a few hours of unprotected intercourse. Thus, it is quite feasible for conception to have already taken place before the woman had an opportunity to take emergency contraception. In this latter case, the medication will prevent the implantation of the pre-embryo in the wall of the uterus.

Since FRC and most other pro-life groups define pregnancy as beginning at conception, they regard the prevention of implantation as an abortion. In fact, since they believe that a human person, (and not a potential human person), comes into existence at or shortly after conception, the use of EC under this latter case would cause the murder of a human person. Thus, the true abortion count, would have been increased by some fraction of 50,000.

The pro-choice and medical view: EC reduces abortions:

Information sources provided by pro-choice, religious liberal and medical organizations state that EC prevents unwanted pregnancies and thus avoids the need for many abortions. The EC website at  Princeton University states that the:

"...use of emergency contraception does not cause an abortion. In fact, emergency contraception prevents pregnancy and thereby reduces the need for induced abortion. Medical science defines the beginning of pregnancy as the implantation of a fertilized egg in the lining of a woman's uterus. Implantation begins five to seven days after fertilization (and is completed several days later). Emergency contraceptives work before implantation and not after a woman is already pregnant. When a woman is already pregnant, emergency contraception does not work. Emergency contraception is also harmless to the fetus and the mother." ₅

The Alan Guttmacher Institute estimates that there are about 6.3 million unintended pregnancies each year in the U.S. ₆ The FDA predicted that if doctors and women adopt EC, then up to 2.3 million of these pregnancies could be prevented; this would avoid the need for up to one million future abortions. This would reduce the level of abortions to a small fraction of their present levels. A conference in India indicated that ECP could make a major impact at reducing that country's 11 million legal and illegal abortions each year. ₇

References:

1. Lawrence Morahan, " 'Morning-After' Pill Available at Some DoD Clinics," CNSNews.com, 2002-JUN-3, at: http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPentagon
2. "Truth in Labeling," Family Research Council, Washington Update, 2002-DEC-18.
3. "Little Pills: Targeting Youth with New Abortion Drugs," Family Research Council. Online at: http://www.frc.org/
4. "Sexuality Education: Counseling and Health Questions and Answers," at: http://www.princeton.edu/
5. "Emergency contraception website," Princeton University, at: http://ec.princeton.edu/
6. Julie Severens Lyons, "Law makes morning-after pill available without prescription: Pharmacies will be able to dispense emergency contraceptives," The Mercury News, 2001-OCT-16, was at: http://www0.mercurycenter.com/
7. Report of a national meeting on emergency contraception held in Lucknow, India in 1996-DEC, was at: http://www.path.org/

Copyright © 2002 to 2007 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally written: 2002-DEC-19
Latest update: 2007-SEP-28
Author: B.A. Robinson