ABORTION NEWS
From 2001-JAN to JUNE

Sponsored link.

Background information on many aspects of abortion is found in individual essays, e.g. public opinion, clinic protests, clinic violence, parental notification,
abortion methods, and post abortion
syndrome. Information about the
use of stem cells is elsewhere.

News items:
 | 2001-JAN-22: World: Funding ban reinstated: President George
W. Bush reinstated the funding ban for family planning programs run by
all international agencies which also provide abortion services, even if the latter is
done out of their own funds.
His rationale was somewhat confusing. He wrote to the U.S. Agency
for International Development: "It is my conviction that
taxpayer funds should not be used to pay for abortions or advocate or
actively promote abortion, either here or abroad." But no
such funds have been involved. Existing legislation prevents foreign
grants from being used to fund abortions.
The Planned Parenthood Federation suggested that this
decision will increase the number of abortions performed worldwide. By
crippling agencies whose main function is disseminating birth control
information, the number of pregnancies in the Third World will
probable escalate rapidly, causing women to search out local abortion
providers.
Reaction was swift:
 | Ann Stone, chairperson of Republicans for Choice said:
"He's supposed to be measuring for drapes on his first
day, not interfering with women's rights. To start out like this
makes us very sad." |
 | Douglas Johnson, legislative director of the National Right
to Live Committee said: "The U.S. government will no
longer be using taxpayer dollars to try to legalize abortion in
countries in Latin America, Africa, and Muslim countries in which
the people are strongly opposed to abortion and believe in the
protection of unborn children." |
 | Kate Michelman, president of the National Abortion and
Reproductive and Reproduction Rights Action League said that
President Bush: "has made it clear that he will use his
presidential powers to undermine the reproductive rights of the
world's women...This should serve as a wake-up call to anyone who
thought Bush would not be a threat to a woman's right to
choose." |
|
 | 2001-JAN-18: USA: This is the start of National
Sanctity of Human Life Week. Nancy Pruett, director of the American
Family Association complained about the number of conservative
Christians who have abortions: "Even pro-life believers, when
faced with the shame of a pregnancy outside of marriage, will do as
King David did...[Christians]
will resort to murder to cover the sin. Some don't believe their
church would ever accept them if they had [borne] the child. Many
Christian parents insist that their churchgoing teen-ager abort rather
than bring shame on the family." 1 |
 | 2001-JAN-29: UK: "Morning-after pills" over-the-counter
pills approved: Following an earlier pilot project, British women
aged 16 and up have been able to obtain Levonelle from pharmacists and
school nurses without a prescription. Baroness Young, a conservative
party member, initiated a bill in the House of Lords to ban the sale
of the drug without a prescription. She argued that sales would
encourage promiscuity, and "undermine family life."
It failed by a vote of 177 to 95. Baroness Gould, president of the Family
Planning Association, disagreed. She said that most consumers are
older woman who had had unprotected sex or a contraceptive failure.
She said that these women were "not irresponsible, reckless or
promiscuous. They are acting responsibly in trying to prevent an
unwanted pregnancy in a world where there is no 100 per cent safe
method of contraception and where human beings are fallible."
2 |
 | 2001-JAN-31: Virginia: Abortion restriction bill: A Virginia
Senate committee approved a bill that would require women seeking
abortions to wait for 24 hours. The bill would also require the
provider to tell the woman the age of the fetus, details of the
abortion procedure and explore other options. Governor Gilmore has
promised to sign the bill into law if it is passed by both houses of
the legislature. |
 | 2001-FEB-5: Europe: European Union will offset U.S. cuts in
family planning: According to the Guardian newspaper, "Britain
and its EU partners are poised to fill some of the gap created by
President George Bush's decision to end US payments to [some] international
family planning organisations..." 3 |
 | 2001-FEB-6: USA: New legislation to further restrict RU-486: Senator
Tim Hutchinson (R-AR) and Representative David Vitter (R-LA)
introduced bills which would require physicians to meet new standards
before they would be allowed to prescribe RU-486. They would have to
be legally authorized to perform surgical abortions and handle any
complications. Under current regulations, they only had to have a
linkage to a physician who could perform abortions. Vicki Saporta,
executive director of the National Abortion Federation
commented: "Claims that this legislation is motivated by a
concern for women's health are at best disingenuous, and at worst
dishonest.'' 4 |
 | 2001-FEB-10: USA: Methodists protest President Bush's restriction
on funding of international family planning groups: According to
ReligionToday: "The United Methodist Church's social action
agency is objecting strongly to one of President Bush's first official
acts, which restricts the use of U.S. funds for international
family planning groups." The order pulls funding from such
organizations if they mention abortion or refer patients to abortion
providers. Jim Winkler, head of the Board of Church and Society,
wrote: "The U.S. Agency for International Development
has found that in every nation where information about contraception
and access to methods of birth control are available, abortion rates
decline. Far from pro-life, your action ensures that more poor
women and their children will perish." |
 | 2001-FEB-14: USA: Congressman sponsors bill to declare fetuses
human. According to CNSNews.com: Representative Lindsey Graham (R,
SC) has reintroduced his Unborn Victims of Violence Act. Last
year's version passed 254 to 172 in the House, but was defeated in the
Senate. It would establish federal legal status for fetuses, when
their mother is the victim of a violent, Federal crime. This would
lead to additional charges against a perpetrator of violence on a
pregnant woman. He said: "About half of the states have
statutes or judicial decisions that criminalize behavior that harms or
kills the unborn. Unfortunately, federal law is silent on the matter."
Some groups have come out in opposition to the bill:
 | The American Association of University Women said that
the bill is "a back-door attack on reproductive rights
because choice opponents could argue that the bill states that
life begins at conception...[The purpose of the bill] is not to
protect women from violence, but to undermine a woman's right to
choose." |
 | The Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, said that
the bill would recognize the fetus as "a separate
entity with discreet legal rights independent of the pregnant
woman [which] could create future 'fetal rights' that could be
used against the pregnant woman." 5 |
|
 | 2001-FEB-15: USA: Bill to reverse funding cuts to foreign family
planning agencies:
Representatives Nita Lowey (D-NY) and Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
introduced a House bill to overturn President Bush's ban on funding
foreign family planning or contraception programs if they also use
money from other sources to advocate for or provide abortions.
6 |
 | 2001-FEB-21: Vatican: Cardinal calls for Vatican III Conference: According
to ReligionToday:
The Archbishop of Milan, Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, has called for
a Third Vatican Council to "help the Church face challenges of
the future, including the role of women, changing sexual mores,
priestly celibacy, contraception and abortion." 7 |
 | 2001-FEB-22: USA: Opposition to funding cut to foreign family
planning agencies: According to the Religious News Service: The General Board of Church and Society of the United
Methodist Church supports a bill that would overturn President
Bush's ban on funding family planning programs of foreign groups which
support abortion with money from other funding sources. The Rev. Jim
Winkler said: "Far from being pro-life, restricting
international family planning funds as President Bush has done only
ensures that more poor women and their children will perish."
He pointed out that, according to government statistics, when
information on family planning is not readily available, abortion
rates rise. 6 |
This essay continues below.

Sponsored link:

 | 2002-FEB-26: South Carolina: Restrictions on abortion clinics: According
to Associated Press:
Abortion providers in the South Carolina launched a lawsuit claiming
that the state was undermining abortion access by requiring them to
meet unreasonable standards that are not required of physicians
performing any similar low risk procedures. The rules govern "everything
from bookkeeping to air flow in clinic offices." The doctors
claim that compliance would be expensive and would raise the cost of
abortions significantly. Their lawyers wrote: "Under the guise
of promoting maternal health, these regulations actually threaten
women's health by significantly hindering their access to safe, legal
abortions." South Carolina authorities responded that the
regulations are very similar to national standards for abortion
practices. The U.S. Supreme Court decided to not review the case. |
 | 2001-MAR-25: Switzerland: Abortions legalized, sort of: According
to the Associated Press, after eight years of bitter debate,
early abortions are now legal in Switzerland. A woman who is fewer than
12 weeks into pregnancy will be freely able to obtain an abortion.
Abortion had been technically illegal in the country in recent years.
However, it had been relatively simple for a woman to obtain an
abortion if she had a letter from a second doctor stating that there
were sound medical reasons. The National Council voted 107 to
69 in favor of the bill; the Council of States approved the
bill 22 to 20. The Christian People's Party had proposed an
amendment that would have required the woman to undergo independent
counseling; it was rejected. The Party will now attempt to
collect 100,000 signatures on a petition which would place the law on
hold until it is passed by a referendum. |
 | 2001-MAY-16: USA: Bill to cut funding to foreign family
planning agencies passes house: Representative Henry Hyde
(R-IL) had introduced a bill to deny funding to family planning
agencies around the world. The funding cutoff would only happen to
those agencies who also either provide abortions using their own
funds, or advocate for liberalization of local abortion laws. House members passed
the amendment 218 to 210. Critics suggest that with less family
planning education, the number of unwanted pregnancies will increase;
this will cause an increase in the number of abortions. A Family
Research Council's press release stated that Hyde's "...support
emphasizes the principle that the federal government has no right to
use the hard-earned dollars of the American people to pay for abortion."
Actually, the Council's statement is incorrect. No federal money goes
to pay for abortion. The money that will be cut off by this bill goes
to pay for contraceptive information. The National Right to Life
Committee's press release stated: "The House wisely
decided not to send tax dollars to groups that campaign to legalize
abortion as a birth-control method in Latin America and Africa." |
 | 2001-JUN: USA: Debate over stem cell research intensifies:
Stem cell research offers great hope to over 100 million Americans who
suffer from various diseases and disorders, ranging from ALS to heart
disease, diabetes and cancer. However, the most useful type of stem
cells are derived from human embryos. Extraction of these cells is
regarded as murder of a human person by many pro-lifers. Research in
government labs is currently suspended. President George W. Bush is
expected to make a decision before the end of July on whether to resume
research. More details. |
 | 2001-JUN-11: Ireland: Dutch abortion ship leaves port:
According to the New York Times, a privately financed Dutch ship will
sail from the Netherlands to Ireland. It is called "Women on Waves."
It has a small operating room on board and a medical staff of two
doctors and a nurse. The purpose of the ship is to make abortion, both
medical and surgical, accessible to the women of Ireland. The people
of Ireland are overwhelmingly Roman Catholic. Irish law bans almost
all abortions, including pregnancies generated through rape or incest.
It allows abortion only in the case of imminent danger to the life of
the woman, including suicidal intent. When the ship is more than 12
miles from shore, it is under Dutch law and can provide abortions on
request. |
 | 2001-JUN-15: USA: Presbyterian Church (USA) General Assembly
considers abortion-related items: The General Assembly considered,
but rejected, an overture (motion) to establish a special committee to
conduct a study of abortion in a biblical and theological context. A
previous study on this topic had been done in 1992. They also declined
an overture to direct the Board of Pensions to require notification of
a parent at least forty-eight hours in advance of any abortion
performed on a minor daughter. They referred two overtures concerning
late-term abortions to the Advisory Committee on Litigation and
the Advisory Committee on Social Witness Policy. 8 |
 | 2001-JUN-28: NJ: Nominee for governor opposed to all abortions:
According to AANEWS: "In an astonishing upset against the state's
political establishment, Jersey City Mayor Bret B. Schundler yesterday
won the Republican nomination for governor, and will face Democratic
opponent James E. McGreevey in the November general election...The new
GOP gubernatorial nominee is strident in his view that all abortion must
be banned, even if the life of the mother is in danger. 'What's the
difference of an inch? If it's illegal to kill the baby once delivered,
why is it legal just a few moments before?' he asked during an
interview." |


References:
- "Churches need to address guilty secret," Religion Today
news summary, 2001-JAN-25.
- "UK 'Morning-after pill' challenge fails," Maranatha
Christian Journal, at: http://www.mcjonline.com/news/01a/20010130c.shtml
- Ian Black, "EU to offset Bush cuts in family planning funds,"
The Guardian, http://www.guardianunlimited.co.uk/bush/story/
- Adam Entous, "Republicans launch new attack on abortion pill,"
Yahoo! News/Reuters, 2001-FEB-6 at: http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010206/ts/
- "Unborn victims bill sponsor optimistic on passage,"
CNSNews.com, at: http://www.mcjonline.com/news/01a/20010213a.shtml
- Kevin Eckstrom, "Methodists Support
Overturn of Bush's Foreign Family Planning Rules," Religion News
Service, at: http://www.religionnews.com/
- "Pope moves to ensure successor," 2001-FEB-21,
ReligionToday news summary.
- Nancy Rodman, "Assembly acts on abortion, other issues," PCUSA
News, 2001-JUN-15.
Copyright © 2001 and 2004 by the Ontario Consultants on
Religious Tolerance
Latest update: 2004-MAR-9
Author: B.A. Robinson


|