| About this site |
| About us |
| Our beliefs |
| Your first visit? |
| Contact us |
| External links |
| Good books |
| Visitor essays |
| Our forum |
| New essays |
| Other site features |
| Buy a CD |
| Vital notes |
| Non-theistic... |
| Atheism |
| Agnosticism |
| Humanism |
| Other |
| Spiritual/ethics |
| Spirituality |
| Morality/ethics |
| Absolute truth |
| Peace/conflict |
| Attaining peace |
| Religious tolerance |
| Religious hatred |
| Religious conflict |
| Religious violence |
| Laws and news |
| Religious laws |
| Religious news |
|
|
 | 2003-OCT-1: NJ: Bill to issue birth certificates to stillborn fetuses: A bill is stalled in the New Jersey Assembly that would authorize the issuance of birth certificates to late-term fetuses who are stillborn. Kathy Evans gave birth to a stillborn fetus at 39 weeks gestation. She was issued a death certificate. She asked: "When you're issued only a death certificate, the first question that comes into your mind is, 'How can one die if one has not been born?' That little tangible thing that you have that represents that child existed in your life....is something you want to hold on to for the rest of your life." 1 |
| 2003-OCT-4: DC: Pro-choice rally: People for the American Way Foundation, NARAL, Pro-Choice America, Planned Parenthood, National Organization for Women and Feminist Majority Foundation held a rally before the Supreme Court . It was the first demonstration leading to the March for Freedom of Choice which will be held on 2004-APR-25. After the rally, a Campus Organizing Training was held. 2 |
| 2003-OCT-10: MO: Judge blocks waiting period bill: Governor
Bob Holden (D-MO) vetoed an abortion bill that would have required women
to wait for at least 24 hours after receiving counseling about "the
indicators and contra-indicators and risk factors, including any
physical, psychological or situational factors" before being able to
have an abortion. The legislature was able to override the veto on
2003-SEP-11. The law was to take effect 30 days later, on OCT-11. It
carried a penalty of $1,000 fine and up to one year in jail. However,
senior U.S. District Judge Scott O. Wright issued a temporary
restraining order which blocked implementation of the law, He said that Planned Parenthood's
claims had validity. They asserted that the law fails to give abortion
providers a precise description of prohibited conduct. Also it
encourages arbitrary enforcement of the law in violation of the
constitutional protection of due process. Judge Wright wrote: "If
allowed to go into effect, the act presents plaintiffs with a choice:
Continue to provide abortions under peril of criminal sanctions, or stop
providing abortions. Each option entails irreparable injury to providers
and/or their patients." He has scheduled a hearing for 2003-JAN-27
to discuss whether a permanent injunction should be granted. Americans United for Life reports that 21 states currently have an "informed consent" law in place that requires such a waiting period. Five additional states have laws under litigation or enjoined by the courts. 3 |
| 2003-OCT-10: MI: Governor vetoes D&X bill: Governor Jennifer Granholm (D-MI) vetoed a bill that would ban certain late-term abortion procedures. Opponents of the bill say that the bill was worded so broadly that it could restrict all abortions. The bill was opposed by two professional medical associations. The bill is clearly unconstitutional because it made no exception to protect the woman from serious health complications. It would have defined birth as occurring when any part of a fetus emerges from a woman's body. The governor vetoed the bill because: "federal courts repeatedly have declared unconstitutional efforts to end partial birth abortion." In 1996 and 1999, previous similar bills were declared unconstitutional because of a lack of a health exception clause. 4 |
| 2003-OCT-13: AK: Superior Court rejects consent law: Judge Sen
Tan of the Anchorage Superior Court struck down as unconstitutional a
state law that required minors to obtain consent for an abortion from a
parent or judge. The state is expected to appeal the ruling to the
Alaska Supreme Court. The law was passed in 1997 and overturned by Judge
Tan in 1998 on the grounds that all Alaskans have an equal right to make
personal decisions. In 2003, the Supreme Court ordered Tan to
reconsider, and to hear testimony on whether the state has a compelling
interest in requiring minors to get consent. He concluded that the state
did have compelling interests, but decided that the law doesn't
accomplish these goals in the least restrictive way. Lt. Gov. Loren
Leman, (R-AK) said the ruling "is way out of step with mainstream
judicial reasoning....This is yet another example of judicial activism,
of judges exceeding their constitutional authority and acting as writers
of the law, rather than interpreters of it." Anna Franks, executive director of Planned Parenthood of Alaska, said: "In a perfect world, all minors would have parents who they could talk to about these matters. Sadly, we don't live in a perfect world and so we challenged the law to protect the few minors who cannot seek parental consent for fear of physical or mental retribution. We adamantly support parental involvement. Our protocols require staff to encourage minors to involve their parents in their reproductive health decisions." 5 |
This essay continues below.
Sponsored link:
| 2003-OCT-30: Britain: Pro-life groups
fighting abortions on genetically defective fetuses: At the present
time, essentially all U.S. and UK expectant parents who learn that their fetus is
severely malformed elect to have an abortion. Pro-life groups in
Britain are hoping to ban abortions in such cases involving severe fetal
abnormality. Their rationale is that the European Union's
Charter of Fundamental Rights outlaws "eugenic practices, in
particular those aiming at the selection of persons." The Charter
will apply in Britain when the EU's constitution comes into force. As
expected, opinions differed over the likelihood of a lawsuit being
successful:
| ||||||||||
| 2003-NOV-5: President Bush signs D&X bill into law: The law which prohibits some D&X abortion procedures -- frequently called "Partial Birth Abortions" --- was signed into law on the afternoon of 2003-NOV-5. Three federal court temporary injunctions were obtained which prevent the law from being enforced. More details. | ||||||||||
| 2003-DEC-21: WA: Official status denied to pro-life university group: Gonzaga University is a 116-year-old Jesuit school in Spokane, WA; it is one of the Northwest's leading Catholic institutions. Two second year law students at Gonzaga, Horne and Katie Hauck, founded a Pro-Life Law Caucus club to promote an anti-abortion agenda and assist a local crisis-pregnancy center. The group's bylaws require that all club officers -- the president, vice president, secretary and treasurer -- must be Christians. Thus, a Conservative or Orthodox Jew who was pro-life would be permitted to join as a POM (Plain Ordinary Member) but could not run for office. They then applied to Gonzaga's Student Bar Association (SBA) to be recognized as a university-sponsored group. This would give them access to money from student fees and advertisement on the university's Web page and student handbook. They were refused because they discriminate against non-Christians in their leadership positions. The precise meaning that the group assigns to the term "Christian" is unknown. Many conservative Christians do not consider mainline and liberal Christians to be part of their religion. SBA President Albert Guadagno said that the issue is not the group's stance on abortion; it's about discrimination. Leadership positions, he said, should be open to all students. University administration spokesperson, Peter Tormey, said that: "Any club seeking funds must not discriminate. This club has that discriminatory clause." Co-founder Horne Hauck said: "It's surprising that a religious school would not [recognize] a Christian group." Greg Lukianoff, spokesman for the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), said: "We live in a strange age, indeed, when a Catholic, Jesuit university would deny a Christian pro-life group recognition because its religious nature is considered discriminatory." 7 | ||||||||||
| 2003-DEC-29: NH: Judge declares
parental notification law unconstitutional: A new law was to take
effect at year end. It would have required a woman under the age of 18 to notify at
least one parent or guardian at least 48 hours before having an abortion. U.S.
District Judge Joseph DiClerico ruled that a new law is unconstitutional
because it does not have an exception to protect the health of the
minor. He wrote: "The attorney general has not explained how
the judicial bypass provision would address the need for an immediate
abortion to protect the health of the mother, and the provision on its
face is insufficient to meet such a need." Similar laws have been
declared unconstitutional iby the Florida Supreme Court and by a federal
appeals court in Colorado. Martin Honigberg, a lawyer for Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, said: "We won." Governor Craig Benson, (R-NH) said that he was disappointed and would promote passage of another notification law. He said: "I believe it is the responsibility of parents, not the government, to raise their children." 8 He appears to misunderstand the nature of the bill. Without the law in place, the government is not involved in a young woman's decision to have an abortion. Only herself, her physician, and perhaps her spiritual counselor are. |
References:
- Terry Phillips, "N.J. Mulls Stillborn Birth Certificates," Family News in Focus, 2003-OCT-1, at: http://www.family.org/
- "Rally at the Supreme Court on Oct. 4 to Build Steam for the March for Freedom of Choice," News release from the People for the American Way, 2003-OCT-3.
- "Judge to block 24-hour wait on abortions," SE Missourian, 2003-OCT-13, at: http://www.semissourian.com/
- Amy Bailey, "Michigan Governor Vetoes Abortion Bill," NewsDay.com, at: http://www.newsday.com/
- "Alaska's abortion consent law rejected: Superior Court judge's ruling draws criticism from lieutenant governor," Associated Press, 2003-OCT-16, at: http://www.juneauempire.com/
- "Abortion laws 'to be challenged'; Thousands of women could be banned from having an abortion under plans being drawn up by anti-abortion groups," BBC News, 2003-OCT-30, at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/
- Tan Vinh, "Gonzaga denies official status to abortion foes," Seattle Times, WA, 2003-DEC-21, at: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/
- "N.H. Judge Nixes Abortion Notification," Associated Press, 2003-DEC-29, ABC News, at: http://abcnews.go.com/
|
Site navigation: Home page > Hot topics > Abortion > Abortion news > here |
Copyright © 2003 & 2004 by the Ontario Consultants on
Religious Tolerance
Created: 2003-OCT-1
Latest update: 2004-MAR-10
Author: B.A. Robinson
|
|
|
Page Translator: