ABORTION ACCESS:
U.S. public opinion polls: Year 2002

Sponsored link.

Zogby International poll of 2002-NOV:
Zogby International conducted the poll of
1,009 American adults from 2002-NOV-12 to 14. The poll's margin of error is
about 3.2 percentage points. Unfortunately, media reporting of the poll results
is difficult to interpret because reports do not differentiate between the
subjects' personal decision whether to have an abortion, or their belief whether
other women should be allowed access to abortion.
Some data is helpful:
 | 22% of American adults are less in favor of
abortion access than they were a decade ago; about 11% are more in favor
of abortion access. The former shift may have been influenced by a number
of factors:
 | Extensive discussion in recent years of "partial
birth abortions." A sizeable percentage of American adults
oppose PBAs. |
 | Most people are probably now aware of
sonograms, and thus are more likely to look upon the developing fetus as
a human person. |
|
 | Two out of three American adults say that
their views on abortion have not changed over the past decade. |
 | About 4% of American voters always vote for
pro-choice candidates. |
 | About 13% of voters always vote for pro-life
candidates. |
 | One-third of persons aged 18 to 29 say that
abortion should never be legal -- apparently even to save the life of the
woman. This support drops to 23% for those aged 30 to 64, and 20% for
those over age 65. 1,2 |

Sponsored link:

Wirthlin Worldwide
National Quorum poll of 2002-DEC:
This poll was conducted on behalf of the pro-life group Faith2Action
in 2002-DEC. (N = 1,001; margin of error = 3.2%). Unfortunately, its data is not too
useful because of the heavily weighted questions:
 | Question: "In light of recent medical advances such
as in-utero surgery and 3-D ultrasound technology, which reveals the
unborn child's body and facial features in detail, are you in favor of
restoring legal protection for unborn children?" 68% of those sampled
were strongly or somewhat in favor. A person who disagreed with this
question would be in the position implying that they didn't want to
protect children. |
 | Question: "Would you favor judicial nominees to the U.S.
Supreme Court who uphold laws that restore protection for unborn children?"
66% of those sampled were strongly or somewhat in favor. The implication
is that some nominees might refuse to uphold existing laws, and are not in
favor of protecting children. 3 |

References:
- "Zogby Poll Shows 70% of Voters Support; Independent Review Over New
Health Care Lawsuits; Majority of Voters Would Oppose Lawsuits if Employers Are
at Risk," at:
http://www.hbcweb.com/Zogby0600.htm
- Jerry Zremski, "Attitudes becomes more negative on abortion," Buffalo
News, 2002-NOV-25, at:
http://www.buffalonews.com/
- "Poll results," at:
http://www.f2a.org/


Copyright © 2002 to 2006 by
Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Latest update: 2006-NOV-15
Author: B.A. Robinson


|