ABORTION TRAINING OF DOCTORS IN OB-GYN RESIDENCY PROGRAMS

Sponsored link.

Quotation:
 | "An American woman's right to abortion was assured by the
Supreme Court...But constitutional right or no, women
cannot get abortions if there is nobody to perform them." 1 |

Status of abortion training in 1992:
The percentage of U.S. Obstetric / Gynecologist (OB-GYN) residency
programs that trained residents in surgical abortion declined from the
late 1970s to the mid 1990s. A study by the Alan Guttmacher Institute
in 1992 revealed that:
 | Only 12% required surgical first-trimester abortion training as an
integral part of their course. This was a decrease from 23% in 1985. |
 | Only 58% included such training as an elective. |
 | Only 7% offered routine training in second-trimester abortions. This
was a decrease from 21% in 1985. |
 | "More than 80% of programs in private, non-Catholic
hospitals and public hospitals provided some form of abortion training
in 1991-1992, but only 6% of programs in Catholic hospitals and no
military programs did so." 2,3 |

ACGME guidelines of 1996:
The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)
published a set of guidelines which recommended that all residents receive
abortion training. "The ACGME is the private body responsible for
establishing educational standards and evaluating and accrediting more
than 7,300 medical residency programs throughout the United States. The ACGME is sponsored by and composed of representatives from the American
Board of Medical Specialties, the American Hospital Association, the
American Medical Association (AMA), the Association of American Medical
Colleges and the Council of Medical Specialty Societies. Residency
programs that are accredited by the ACGME must comply with a set of
standards that its experts have deemed essential to graduate medical
education." 4
Their guidelines were implemented on 1996-JAN-1. They specified that:
"No program or resident with a religious or moral objection
will be required to provide training in, or to perform, induced
abortions. Otherwise, access to experience with induced abortion must
be part of residency education. This education can be provided outside
the institution. Experience with management of complications of
abortion must be provided to all residents. If a residency program has
a religious, moral or legal restriction which prohibits the residents
from performing abortions within the institution, the program must
ensure that the residents receive a satisfactory education and
experience managing the complications of abortion. Furthermore, such
residency programs:
- must not impede residents in their program who do not have a
religious or moral objection from receiving education and
experience in performing abortions at another institution;
and
- must publicize such policy to all applicants to that
residency."
The guidelines affected "all public teaching hospitals which
offer Ob/Gyn residencies because public hospitals cannot have moral or
religious objections to a medical procedure which is protected by law
without compromising the separation of church and state." 5

Reactions by pro-life groups to the ACGME guidelines:
At last two pro-life organizations have gone on record as opposing the ACGME
guidelines. In both cases, they appear to misrepresent or misunderstand
those guidelines:
 | Concerned Women for America (CWA) In its essay on abortion
training, the CWA asked the question: "Should medical residents be
forced to perform abortions?" They answered: "In essence,
the National Abortion Federation and the Accreditation Council for Graduate
Medical Education would place on each resident the burden of death."
They
appear to be unaware of the opting out clause in the guidelines which
state that "No...resident with a religious or moral objection
will be required to provide training in, or to perform, induced
abortions." 6 We Emailed
CWA on 2000-DEC-15, and pointed out this factual error. They never responded] |
 | American Association of Pro Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG):
In an essay opposing what the call "ACGME Mandatory
Abortion Training" they state that ACGME "passed a revised
'Program Requirement for Residency Education in OB/Gyn' which specifically
mandated that every OB/Gyn residency training program in the country
must include induced abortion training, effective January 1, 1996."
7 (The emphasis was in the
original). They also appear to be unaware of the
opting out clause in the guidelines which state that
"No program ...with a religious or moral objection
will be required to provide training in, or to perform, induced
abortions." At most, conservative Protestant or Roman
Catholic hospitals merely need to release their students so that they can
obtain abortion training at another facility. We
attempted to Email AAPLOG, and pointed out this factual error. However, they
do not provide an Email address on their web site. |
This essay continues below.

Sponsored link:

Federal Government reaction to the ACGME guidelines:
Senate bill S-2280 included an omnibus appropriations bill for fiscal
year 1996 which included an amendment in opposition to the ACGME guidelines. The
amendment allowed OB/GYN residency programs to eliminate abortion training
without fear of losing federal funding. The amendment forbade:
"discrimination by the Federal Government against any health
care entity that refused to be involved in certain abortion-related
activities. Further, if an accrediting agency denied a postgraduate physician
training program accreditation due to its failure to be involved in one or
more of those abortion-related activities, and if it would have granted
accreditation but for that failure, the Federal Government would deem that
program to be accredited for the purpose of licensing, certifying, or
otherwise granting legal status to that program, and for the purpose of
providing financial assistance or other benefits. These provisions barring
discrimination and deeming accreditation would also apply to State and local
governments that received financial assistance from the Federal Government for
health-related activities."
Those supporting the amendment felt that secular and public institutions
should not be forced to include abortion training in their residency programs;
they should be permitted to opt out just as religious institutions are able to.
Those opposing the amendment felt that as long as abortions are constitutional
and legal, they should be safe. In order to be safe, medical training must be
available. If secular and public institutions are
required to offer abortion training, then pressure from pro-life groups "will
be useless, and the right of women to procure safe, legal abortions will remain
secure." The amendment passed with a vote of 63 to 37, pretty much on
party lines. 9

MSFC policy on abortion training:
Medical Students for Choice issued the following statement on abortion
training. The date was not provided.
"Every medical
provider will have patients who have had, currently want, or someday will
seek an abortion. And physicians who do not perform abortions often have
patients call them with questions following an abortion obtained
elsewhere. They should know how to address the patient's concerns
knowledgeably and comfortably.
MSFC encourages medical schools to include the following in their
curriculum for all students:
 | Didactic instruction on the public health,
social, and historical context of abortion; |
 | Medical and surgical abortion techniques; |
 | Pre- and post-abortion management; and |
 | Pregnancy-options and contraceptive counseling. |
In addition, every medical school should provide students with the
opportunity to observe abortion procedures, including pre-abortion
counseling." 7

Status of abortion training in 1998:
During 1998, researchers from the National Abortion Federation (NAF)
surveyed all 261 OB-GYN residency programs. 179 responded, revealing that:
 | 46% now include routine first trimester abortion training. |
 | 34% offer it as an elective. |
 | 44% offer routine training in second-trimester abortions. |
The data were published in an article in the NAF's Family Planning
Perspective magazine for 2000-NOV/DEC. The authors warn that the
information might not be representative of all programs. Most of the 82 programs
that did not respond to the survey may well not offer this training.
NAF executive director Vicki Sapporta commented: "This is very
encouraging news in terms of women's access to abortion and their ability
to continue to access abortion services in the future." 
Implications for the future:
There are a number of trends in the area of unwanted pregnancies and
abortion. These lead to a reduction in the number of surgical abortions sought:
 | An increasing number of pregnancies are being prevented through the use
of emergency contraception (EC), commonly called
"the morning after pill." |
 | An increasing number of abortions are being performed using medical, not
surgical methods. |
 | There appears to be an increase in the use of oral sex in place of
sexual intercourse by teens. |
 | There appears to be an increase in the number of teens who have decided
to remain celibate, at least for a short period during their teenage years. |
All four trends lessen the number of surgical abortions being performed.

References
- "Abortion: The Doctors Return," The New York Times,
1995-FEB-16.
- Rita Rubin, "More med schools offer abortion training,"
USA Today, 2000-NOV-21, at: http://www.usatoday.com/life/health/women/lhwom143.htm
- H.T. MacKay & A.P. MacKay, "Abortin training in
Obstetrics and gynecology residency programs in the United States,
1991-1992," Family Planning Perspectives, Vol. 27, #3,
1995-MAY/JUN, Pages 112 to 115. Summary available at: http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/journals/2711295.html
- The National Abortion Federation, Residency Training in Abortion
Practice, Questions and Answers, cited in 5.
- Beka Cook-Mac, "Abortion training in Ob/Gyn residency
programs," at: http://students.haverford.edu/wmbweb/writings/rcabortion.html
- "Abortion training mandatory," CWA Library,
1998-APR-22, at: http://www.cwfa.org/library/life/
"Our policy on abortion training," MSFC, at: http://www.ms4c.org/policy.shtml
- Daniel Martin, "AAPLOG opposes ACGME mandatory abortion
training," at: http://www.aaplog.org/newsmat.html
- "Omnibus Appropriations/Abortion & Medical
licensing-accreditation," at: http://www.senate.gov/~rpc/rva/1042/104239.htm
- "National Abortion Federation: The voice of abortion
providers" has a web site at: http://www.prochoice.org/
- "The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Women's
health care physicians," has a web site at: http://www.acog.org/

Site navigation:

Copyright © 2000 and 2004 by Ontario Consultants on Religious
Tolerance
Originally written: 2000-DEC-15
Latest update: 2004-MAR-16
Author: B.A. Robinson

|