About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Your first visit?
Contact us
External links
Good books
Visitor essays
Our forum
New essays
Other site features
Buy a CD
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
.
CHRISTIANITY
Who is a Christian?
Shared beliefs
Handle change
Bible topics
Bible inerrancy
Bible harmony
Interpret Bible
Persons
Beliefs, creeds
Da Vinci code
Revelation, 666
Denominations
.
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Other spirituality
Cults and NRMs
Comparing religions

About all religions
Important topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handle change
Doubt/security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
World's end
One true religion?
Seasonal topics
Science v. Religion
More info.

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality/ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten commandm'ts
Abortion
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment
Equal rights - gays & bi's
Gay marriage
Nudism
Origins of the species
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking kids
Stem cells
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

Emergency Contraception (EC)

Approval of EC by the Food
and Drug Administration (FDA)

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.

horizontal rule

Background:

Two brands of emergency contraceptives were originally available in the U.S. only under a doctor's prescription. Unfortunately, they have to be taken within a short time of intercourse. There often was insufficient time for a woman to get an appointment, obtain a prescription, get the pills and take them within the 72 hour limit. This is particularly critical on weekends and over holidays -- times when the need for EC often rises. Some doctors refuse to prescribe these pills for moral reasons. Some women do not have a doctor; others cannot afford one. A survey conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation in the year 2000 found that 11% of ob/gyn physicians had never written a prescription for emergency contraceptives. 1

The state of Washington adopted a Collaborative drug therapy agreement that has allowed trained pharmacists to dispense emergency contraceptives since 1998. California passed a similar enabling law which came into effect on 2002-JAN-1. Alaska, Hawaii, New Mexico, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont passed similar legislation in subsequent years. 2

horizontal rule

Eventual approval of EC by the FDA:

During early 2001, the Center for Reproductive Rights petitioned the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to switch emergency contraception pills to nonprescription status. They did this on behalf of over 60 medical groups including the American Medical Women’s Association and the American Public Health Association. 3

The Food and Drug Administration organized a committee of experts to determine whether EC was sufficiently safe and effective to allow its sale over-the counter. They determined that it met these criteria.

Pro-life and conservative Christian groups have wielded a strong influence over the federal administration. Some have suggested that religious considerations and political pressure have caused the FDA to deviate from their normal approval processes for new medications and inhibited women's free access to and knowledge of EC.

In a highly unusual move that might seriously damage the reputation of the FDA, its Commissioner, Lester Crawford, overruled the committee's decision. Dr Susan F Wood, the Assistant FDA Commissioner director of the office of women's health resigned. She said that she can no longer serve in an agency that rejects scientific and clinical evidence that has been properly evaluated.

Crawford explained that the FDA was unable to develop a plan to prevent women under the age of 18 from buying the medication. 4 With the average age of first sexual intercourse being 16 years of age, there would obviously be many women under the age of 18 who would wish to obtain EC quickly.

Kaiser Network's daily reports announced that:

"In 2006-AUG-24, the FDA approved Barr Laboratories' Plan Bfor nonprescription sale to women and men 18 years and older throughout the U.S. Barr agreed to send anonymous shoppers into pharmacies to test their compliance with the age description. In addition, gas stations and convenience stores are prohibited from selling the EC." 5

In practice, the age limit will probably not present a significant barrier to sexually active young women under 18-years-of-age. Most will be able to make an arrangement with an older woman or man who will be able to buy the pills for them.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link:

horizontal rule

Responses to the FDA decision:

Most newspapers' editorials and opinion pieces reacted positively to the development on 2006-AUG-25. However some opinion pieces by conservative Christian groups disapproved:

bulletPhiladelphia Inquirer: FDA's decision to limit nonprescription sales of Plan B to women older than 18 is "about moral preference, not science; about preserving parents' control over minor children, not medical prudence," an Inquirer editorial says. Although the decision "won't please family planning groups that argued against" age restrictions or "those who consider Plan B a form of abortion," it is the "best decision the nation could expect of this administration," the editorial says.
bulletSeattle Post-Intelligencer: By approving nonprescription sales of Plan B to women ages 18 and older, FDA has "finally taken a big step to prevent pregnancies, protect health and reduce" the number of abortions, a Post-Intelligencer editorial says. However, the "decision included a compromise based on ideology" because it does not allow for nonprescription sales among girls ages 17 and younger, according to the editorial. "At the state and national levels, ideology has inserted itself into the discussions," the editorial says, concluding, "Science, the facts and the need to reduce the high U.S. teen birth rate ought to guide the decisions"
bulletMaureen Downey, Atlanta Journal-Constitution: The FDA approval "signals a rare victory for women's reproductive health, which has been a casualty of the Republican Party's courtship of far right extremists," Downey, a member of the Journal-Constitution's editorial board, writes in an opinion piece. However, the "18-and-older rule is a political mollification" that has "no scientific or health basis," Downey writes, adding that it also is "unfortunate because it's teenagers who engage in unprotected sex and have less access to birth control than their peers worldwide."
bulletDavid Stevens, Atlanta Journal-Constitution: FDA's decision concerning Plan B was "influenced by political pressure," Stevens, executive director of the [conservative] Christian Medical and Dental Associations, writes in a Journal-Constitution opinion piece. By "allowing both prescription" and nonprescription sales of Plan B, FDA "appears" to be creating an "entirely new type of approval that neither has been authorized by Congress nor subjected to a formal rulemaking process," Stevens writes, adding that it is questionable how FDA will be able to ensure that "this scheme is followed."
bulletMary Worthington, Philadelphia Inquirer: While "we can make no simplistic post hoc correlations here between access to a drug and wholesale sexual behavior," two European studies have shown after Plan B became available without a prescription, sexually transmitted infection rates increased and abortion rates either increased or did not decrease, Worthington of Generation Life writes in an Inquirer opinion piece. FDA has "made a mistake in according" nonprescription "status to Plan B," Worthington writes, concluding, "Here's hoping the policy is revised or ended soon" 5

horizontal rule

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1. Julie Severens Lyons, "Law makes morning-after pill available without prescription: PHARMACIES WILL BE ABLE TO DISPENSE EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTIVES," The Mercury News, 2001-OCT-16, was at: http://www0.mercurycenter.com/  No longer online.
  2. Judith A. Soon, et al., "Effects of making emergency contraception available without a physician's prescription: a population-based study," Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2005-MAR-29, Page 172-180. It is online at: http://www.cmaj.ca/
  3. "Center for Reproductive Rights Petitions FDA to Change Emergency Contraception from Prescription to Over the Counter," Center for Reproductive Rights, 2001-FEB-14, at: http://www.reproductiverights.org/
  4. Gardiner Harris, "Official quits on pill delay at the F.D.A.," New York Times, 2005-SEP-01, at: http://query.nytimes.com/
  5. "Kaiser Daily Women's Health Policy Report Summarizes Editorials on Approval of Nonprescription Plan B Sales to Women Over Age 18," KaiserNetwork, 2006-AUG-28, at: http://www.kaisernetwork.org/

horizontal rule

Site navigation: Home > "Hot" topics > Abortion > Reducing abortionEC menu > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © 1999 to 2007 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally published on 1999-JAN-13
Latest update: 2007-MAY-28
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)

horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or to the Emergency Contraceptive menu, or  choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?


Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.