Twitter icon


Facebook icon

ABOUT THIS SITE
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD of this site
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
Christian def'n
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret the Bible
 Persons
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
 Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment/climate

Same-sex marriage

Homosexuality
Human rights
Gays in the military
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

 

Religious Tolerance logo

Abortion access

Menu

U.S., Canada, & the rest of the world:
Laws restricting/allowing abortion access, etc.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.

horizontal rule

abprtopm sogm Conflicts concerning personal access and freedom:

At any given time in the U.S. and elsewhere, there seem to be at least two very active religiously-motivated conflicts.

Back in early 2016, there were two such battles. Both involved personal access and equality. They were:

  1. Marriage equality: Whether loving, committed same-sex couples should be allowed to marry.
  2. Abortion access: Under what conditions, if any, should a state or federal government veto a woman's personal decision to have an abortion. This conflict continues with little or no evidence of resolution.

horizontal rule

When does human life begin?

The morality of abortion access is tightly linked to the concept of when "human life" and "human personhood" begin:

  • One scientific definition of life requires that for an organism to be considered alive it must:
    • maintain homeostasis -- have the ability to maintain an internal balance in spite of changes in its external environment,
    • be composed of cells,
    • undergo metabolism -- internal processes that maintain life,
    • be able to grow,
    • adapt to their environment,
    • respond to stimuli, and
    • reproduce. 1

This means that, according to this definition:

  • A human ovum is not considered a form of life because it cannot divide and produce two ova.

  • A spermatozoon is not considered a form of human life because it cannot divide and produce two spermatozoa.

  • But at conception, when an ovum and spermatozoon merge and produce a human zygote -- a.k.a. a just-fertilized egg -- it meets all of these criteria and is generally considered a form of life. Its ability to reproduce is rarely acted upon. A single zygote can split into two zygotes. This is the way in which monozygotic (identical) twins are produced. Further, since a zygote contains human DNA, it is recognized as a form of human life by the scientific, pro-life, and most of the pro-choice communities. Similarly, human embroyos, fetuses and newborns are viewed as human life.

  • A newborn human baby is not only a form of human life, but is almost universally recognized as a human person.

horizontal rule

When does human personhood begin?

Unfortunately, there is no consensus on when human life becomes a human person:

  • Most pro-lifers believe that it happens at conception. That is, when the process of conception is complete, and a zygote is formed, it is both a form of human life and a human person.

  • Pro-choicers have different beliefs about when personhood is first attained. Examples are:
    • When the embryo's heart beat can be detected.
    • When an embryo loses its gill slits and tail, and resembles a human.
    • About 23 weeks gestation, when the fetus is viable -- capable of surviving outside her or his mother's body. At the current level of medical expertise, 20 to 35% of fetuses born at this age will survive.
    • About 24 weeks gestation, when the fetus' higher brain functions first turn on and the fetus becomes sentient -- able to sense its environment.
    • When the fetus is half-emerged from her or his mother's body. (This is also the traditional Jewish belief).
    • When the fetus has fully emerged.
    • When the umbilical cord is cut and the baby is separated from his or her mother.

  • Some aboriginal groups believe that a human life becomes a human person during a special ritual after birth when the newborn is given a name.

horizontal rule

Positive factors in the battle over abortion access:

One near concensus does exist: when a person believes that personhood has been attained, they generally feel that abortions becomes unethical unless the mother's life is threatened, or health is seriously threatened. That concensus offers hope, because if more people agree on when human personhood begins, then a compromise over abortion may be possible.

Battles over abortion are typically caused when a woman -- after consultation with friends, family, her physician, perhaps her spiritual advisor, etc. decides that to have an abortion is the least worse option for her, but the government has vetoed her decision by making an abortion unavailable to her.

There is one positive aspect to the abortion conflict. Both pro-life advocates and pro-choice advocates agree that they would like to see the number of abortions and the abortion rate reduced. There are two main ways to do this:

  • By making abortions unavailable. Pro-life groups have concentrated essentially all of their effort in this area. Pro-choice groups have concentrated essentially all of their effort to keeping abortions available, and safe.

  • By noting that the vast majority of abortions are not caused by medical necessity; they are caused by an unwanted, unplanned for and unexpected pregnancy. In excess of 40% of such pregnancies end in intentional abortions. A study in Toledo has shown that if women are supplied with free contraceptives, their abortion rate is drastically reduced. The Health and Human Services (HHS) mandate which would allow almost all employed women to obtain free contraceptives through her health insurance would go a long way to reducing the abortion rate to a small percentage of its current rate. Unfortunately, many employers are resisting this mandate. An even greater reduction in abortion rate could be achieved by making contraception available to all unemployed women of childbearing age.

The logical groups to press for such a change are the pro-life and pro-choice organizations. Unfortunately, that would require cooperation and dialogue, and very little of either is happening.

horizontal rule

Topics covered in this section:

bullet Abortion access in North America:
bullet Laws and court cases concerning abortion access:
bullet

In the U.S

bullet In Canada
bullet Dr. Morgentaler receives medal

bullet Roe v. Wade; Its basis; court philosophies; political aspects

bullet 2004 to 2012: Party platforms written by the U.S. National Democratic and Republican parties

bullet 2016: Controversy over Senator Kaine (D-VA), presumptive VP candidate, and his views on abortion

bullet The future battle over abortion access in the U.S.; the impact if Roe v. Wade is overturned; state bills to criminalize abortion; division within the pro-life movement
 
bullet star 2017-JAN until now: The U.S. Federal "Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act"

bullet star 2017-SEP: Trump Administration defines a zygote -- a just-fertilized ovum -- to be a human person

bullet

star Some U.S. State bills & constitutional amendments to criminalize or restrict abortions in:


bullet Canadian bills attempting to restrict abortion Part 1  Part 2

bullet The "FACE" law

bullet Use of the RICO laws against pro-life groups

bullet Parental notification and consent laws

bullet

Interstate travel to abortion clinics

bullet

The "Born-alive Infants Protection Act"


bullet

The "Unborn Victims of Violence Act"

bullet

Abortion training in Ob-Gyn residency programs


bullet Proposed anti-abortion laws in Georgia
bullet

2002

bullet

2005

bullet "Choose Life" specialty license plates
 
bullet Laws affecting abortion access elsewhere in the world:

bullet The "Mexico City" policy restricting aid to family planning agencies

bullet Abortion access in Mexico City, Mexico

bullet Abortion access in Portugal

bullet Abortion access in Uruguay

horizontal rule

Related section:

horizontal rule

References used:

The following information source was used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlink is not necessarily still active today.

  1. "Life," Wikipedia, as on 2017-NOV-13, at: https://en.wikipedia.org/

 

Site navigation:

Home > "Hot" religious topics and conflicts > Abortion > here

Home > Abortion > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © 1996 to 2017 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally published: 1996-DEC-20
Last updated 2017-NOV-16
Author: B.A. Robinson
line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or the abortion access menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Hot, controversial topics

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

 

 

Sponsored links: