Twitter icon

Facebook icon

About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD of this site
Vital notes

World religions
Christian def'n
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret the Bible
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Confusing terms
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Death penalty

Same-sex marriage

Human rights
Gays in the military
Sex & gender
Stem cells
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news



!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

Abortion access


Reducing the U.S. abortion rate


A human ovum and spermatozoon are generally considered to be alive. Both contain human DNA. Thus both are generally considered to be forms of human life. However, there is also a general agreement that neither is a actual human person.

There is a lack of consensus in North America about when -- between conception and childbirth -- human life becomes an actual person who is entitled to legal rights including the right to not be killed. This lack of consensus has led to a deep division in the U.S. and Canada between the pro-life and pro-choice movements.  The former generally believe that the transition from human life to human person happens at conception. Pro-choicers generally believe that it happens later; some suggest it happens at or even shortly after childbirth.

The main activities of the pro-life movement has concentrated on restricting abortion as much as is legally possible without violating the Roe v. Wade decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973. That ruling guaranteed the legality of abortion early in pregnancy. Meanwhile, the pro-choice movement focused their effort on making a woman's choice to have an abortion available throughout pregnancy.

About the year 2006, a new emphasis surfaced. It is a desire to minimize unwanted pregnancies and thus eliminate the need for many or most abortions. This is a goal that many pro-lifers and pro-choicers can enthusiastically embrace. Many countries in Europe have successfully lowered their rate to levels far less than those in the U.S.  Unfortunately, the methods that they used may prove to be deeply offensive and unacceptable to many in the North American pro-life movement.

The 2008 presidential elections showed a clear difference between the platforms of the Democratic and Republican parties:

bullet The Democratic party promised to increase abortion access, while attempting to reduce the number of abortions by lowering the number of unwanted pregnancies and by increasing support to pregnant women so that childbirth becomes a viable option for them to choose.
bulletThe Republican party promised to attempt to reduce the number of abortions by making abortions less accessible.

bulletMore details

Topics covered in this section:

bulletReducing the abortion rate by:

Reducing the U.S. abortion rate by reducing unwanted pregnancies:

bulletImproved technology

bulletEncouraging pregnant couples to choose childbirth


bulletShould a person who wants to reduce the abortion rate vote Democrat or Republican?

bulletEssays donated by visitors to this web site:
bulletAngie Pratt: "Reducing the abortion rate via social programs & education"

bullet "Northstar:" A response to the above essay
bulletComparing adolescent pregnancy and abortion rates in the U.S. and Europe
bullet Contraceptive methods Part 1 Part 2 Part 3
bulletEmergency contraception (EC) (a.k.a. the morning-after pill)

bulletWal-Mart's initial refusal to stock this medication in the U.S. and Canada

Sponsored link:

Site navigation:

Home > Abortion > here

Home > "Hot" religious topics and conflicts > Abortion > here

Portions originally published: 1997-JAN-20
Last updated 2016-JUL-01
Author: Bruce A Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)

Go to the previous page, or the abortion access menu, or choose:


Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

Sponsored links: