About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links
Good books
Visitor essays
Our forum
New essays
Other site features
Buy a CD of this site
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
   Who is a Christian?
   Shared beliefs
   Handling change
   Bible topics
   Bible inerrancy
   Bible harmony
   Interpret Bible
   Persons
   Beliefs, creeds
   Da Vinci code
   Revelation, 666
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
 
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing religions

Non-theistic...
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Important topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt/security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
End of the world
One true religion?
Seasonal topics
Science v. Religion
More info.

Spirituality and ethics
Spirituality
Morality and ethics
Absolute truth

Peace and conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment
Equal rights -gays/bi's
Same-sex marriage
Nudism
Origins of the species
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking kids
Stem cells
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

Web site logo

Abortion in the U.S.

MENU

South Dakota anti-abortion law
(originally bill, HB1215)

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.

horizontal rule

Abortion in South Dakota:

About 825 abortions are performed yearly in South Dakota.

Bill HB 1215 was introduced into the legislature with the intent of triggering the Supreme Court overturn of Roe v. Wade. It was signed into law by Governor Mike Rounds (R) 2006-MAR-06  

It criminalizes almost all abortions in the state. Only abortions necessary to save the life of the woman would be allowed. It contains no exceptions to permit abortions in the case of rape or incest. It does not allow an exception to prevent serious and/or permanent disability to the woman.

The law prohibits termination of human life at any time after conception. That is, once conception has occurred, the woman is forced to give birth, unless a miscarriage happens.  The wording of the law appears to be ambiguous on the topic of emergency contraception (EC). Arguments can be made that the law either criminalizes or allows EC. The section of the law that appears at first glance to permit EC may in fact prohibit it.

Normally, the law would have taken effect in 2006-JUL. However, pro-choice forces raised sufficient signatures to delay implementing the law until the public was able to vote on the issue during the mid-term elections on 2006-NOV-07. The law was defeated by a clear majority and is now dead in the water.

horizontal rule

Topics covered in this section:

bulletIntroduction; passage of the South Dakota anti-abortion bill HB 1215:
bulletReactions to the bill's passage
bulletPublic reaction; Campaign; Votes
bulletDoes the law permit or criminalize emergency contraception (EC)?

horizontal rule

Related essays on this web site:

bulletAnti-abortion bills in various states
bulletLaws restricting abortion in the U.S. and Canada
bulletRoe v. Wade: Its basis; court philosophies; political aspects
bulletThe future battle over women's access to abortion; The impact if Roe v. Wade is overturned

horizontal rule

Site navigation:

 Home page > "Hot" topics > Abortion > Legal aspects > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2006 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Latest update: 2006-OCT-08
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)

horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or return to the "Legal aspects of abortion" menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?