Classifying views on abortion
access as pro-life, pro-choice, etc.
Sponsored link.
Problems classifying views on abortion:
People hold diverse beliefs concerning the ethics of
abortion in general and whether individual women -- faced with specific problems
-- should be able to choose to end their pregnancy via an an abortion.
However, many people have a fondness for dichotomy -- the splitting of a
topic or item into precisely two non-overlapping parts. Examples are us vs. them;
religious vs. secular worldviews; theists vs. atheists, etc. However, the world
is often not that simplistic.
Public opinion pollsters and commentators often attempt to squeeze beliefs
about abortion into only two
categories: pro-life and pro-choice. As a minimum, there are in reality at least
four categories -- most of which have a number of sub-categories to consider.
The pro-life movement:
Its members are motivated by a desire to reduce the
number of abortions, or to totally eliminate tem altogether. At the same time, they reject violence against persons
and property as means of reaching their goals. Being pro-life they very strongly
oppose assassination and attempted murder of abortion providers and abortion
clinic staff.
Fundamentalist and other evangelical Christians form another major section of
the pro-life movement. Their faith groups generally oppose abortions, favor
executions of convicted murderers, and oppose physician assisted suicide.
Most individuals in the pro-life movement share a single concept: that human
life in the form of an ovum and spermatozoon becomes a
human person at the instant of conception. From this
principle, it naturally follows that a newly fertilized ovum, an embryo, a
fetus, and a newborn are all human persons who should be granted the same rights, privileges
and protections as a child or adult -- including the right to life. Some view an abortion clinic as the ethical equivalent of a
Nazi death camp.
Within the pro-life movement are persons with conflicting views of abortion:
Some follow the teachings of the Roman Catholic church and advocate for laws
and regulations that would not allow abortions even to save the life of the
woman.
Most would allow abortions only if needed to save her life.
Many would allow abortions to women who have become pregnant through rape or incest.
Some would allow abortions for women who would suffer serious or permanent disability if the pregnancy were allowed to
continue.
The anti-abortion movement:
Individuals in this movement hold pro-life beliefs, and go one
massive step
further: They feel that acts of violence against abortion clinics are
justifiable in order to lower the number of abortions. Some argue in favor of the ultimate violent acts: to attempt to
assassinate abortion providers and clinic staff. The term "anti-abortion"
has only been in common use since the Clinton years when it was first used to
identify individuals and groups who employ violence and murder to attain their
political ends.
The term "anti-abortion" is occasionally used as a derogatory term to refer
to persons in the pro-life movement. We recommend against this use because it
leads to confusion. Any time that there is one word or phrase with two meanings,
the result is chaos.
A pattern has been observed in which U.S. anti-abortionists tend to be
relatively inactive during Republican federal administrations and very active
during Democratic presidents. More details.
Sponsored link:
The pro-choice movement:
The pro-choice movement generally teaches that the fetus becomes
a human
person at various stages later in gestation, when:
It loses its neck structures which resemble gill slits, or
It loses its tail, or
It begins to look human, or
It becomes sentient. That is, its brain's higher functions first turn on and the fetus is able to sense its environment,
generate thoughts, has memories, etc. or
Its lungs develop to the point that it becomes viable and can survive
outside the womb, or
It is born, or
Some other transition point occurs between conception and birth.
From this viewpoint, a woman's access to a safe and affordable early abortion
is viewed as a fundamental human right. Many pro-choicers advocate that a woman
should be able to
choose abortion at any stage of gestation for any reason that she feels is
valid.
The pro-abortion "movement:"
This movement, a.k.a. "pro-abort," is often referred to but doesn't actually
exist. This movement would be made up of persons who actively promote abortion.
There may be a few such individuals in North America who administer abortion
clinics and are motivated by greed, but no movement.
The terms "pro-abortion" and "pro-aborts" are generally used by some
religious conservatives as phrases to denigrate abortion providers and pro-choicers.
This is a snarl phrase used to disseminate hatred. We recommend against its use.
Classifying the public's beliefs concerning abortion access:
As noted above, each of the movements -- at least the three that exist:
pro-choice, pro-abortion and pro-choice -- can be subdivided into many shades of
beliefs. Thus to make a statement that X percent of American adults are pro-life
while Y percent are pro-choice is almost meaningless.
The only way to accurately understand the public's actual opinion would be
for a polling agency to present to a group of perhaps 1,200 randomly selected
adults a series of scenarios that real women face with problem pregnancies. The
subjects would then be asked whether laws and regulations should allow a woman
in such a scenario to have an abortion if she wished to have one. This would
produce data with a margin of error on the order of ±3 percentage points.
Although such a survey is badly needed to truly assess public opinion, we
have never been able to find one in the literature.