Quantcast
About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Your first visit?
Contact us
External links
Good books
Visitor essays
Our forum
New essays
Other site features
Buy a CD
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
 
CHRISTIANITY
Who is a Christian?
Shared beliefs
Handle change
Bible topics
Bible inerrancy
Bible harmony
Interpret Bible
Persons
Beliefs, creeds
Da Vinci code
Revelation, 666
Denominations
 
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing religions

Non-theistic...
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Important topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handle change
Doubt/security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
World's end
One true religion?
Seasonal topics
Science v. Religion
More info.

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality/ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten commandm'ts
Abortion
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment
Equal rights - gays & bi's
Gay marriage
Nudism
Origins of the species
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking kids
Stem cells
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

 

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

Is truth absolute or relative?

INTRODUCTION

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.


horizontal rule

Introduction:

Some current religious/philosophical debates concern:

bulletThe nature of truth:
bulletAre there answers to some questions that are absolute. That is, they are universally true for all time and in all societies? For example, it is possible to say "Thou shalt not murder" absolutely? or
bulletAre answers always relative to a particular culture, or era, or worldview? (A worldview is a person's basic beliefs concerning deity, humanity and the rest of the universe.)
bulletThe morality of certain acts and behaviors:
bulletDoes a specific act always fall into the same classification (right,  wrong, or morally neutral)? or
bulletCan an act be either right, wrong, or neutral, depending on the culture, the precise situation, and the era?
bulletAssuming that "truth" exists, how do we determine it?
bulletThere exists a near consensus on many matters of right and wrong, truth and falsehood within conservative Christian faith groups; their morality is based on their unique interpretation of the Bible, a book which they generally believe to be inerrant and inspired by God
bulletThere is often an agreement on many issues of right and wrong/truth and falsehood within liberal Christian faith groups, based on their unique interpretation of the Bible and other sources of information. 
bulletThere may well be still a third consensus among many Agnostics, Atheists, Freethinkers and Humanists, on these matters, based on their core secular beliefs. 
bulletOn matters of behavior, religious conservatives, liberal faith groups, and secular groups agree on many items, such as the immorality of murder, theft, lying, adultery, etc. But they often differ totally on sexual and other topics. e.g. as abortion access, homosexual rights, pre-marital sex, child corporal punishment, death penalty....the list goes on.
bulletBoth groups of Christians believe that they are interpreting the Bible correctly and that the other side is mistaken. If truth exists, then only one group (perhaps neither) is right. 

The essential conflict concerns the nature of truth and values: whether they are absolute or relative.

bulletSome people, particularly those from the conservative wing of various religions argue that absolute truth exists. They feel that they can study their religious holy texts and derive from it statements that are absolutely true.
bulletMany others say that absolute truth does not exist; all truth is relative to the religion, society, and era in question. That is a rather silly statement. It is, in itself, an absolute statement. By definition, it is invalid!
bulletStill others argue that all "truth" that they have seen to date is relative. Absolute truth may be out there, but they have not seen any indications of it. They have evaluated true/false statements about many theological and moral truths, but have never found any that can be proven to be absolute.

A religious group might consider a moral statement to be absolute, because it is based upon their core, foundational beliefs and assumptions. A Southern Baptist might assert that the statement "Homosexual behavior is a sin" is an absolute truth, because of their interpretation of the Bible. A Christian from a mainline or liberal denomination might say that the statement "Sexual behavior, whether homosexual or heterosexual, is not a sin, if it is consensual, non-exploitive, safe, and confined to a committed relationship" is an absolute truth, because of:

bulletTheir interpretation of the Bible's text;
bulletTheir understanding of the nature of sexual orientation
bulletTheir personal experience, and
bulletTheir study of information from medical sources, mental health professional associations, and human sexuality researchers. 

Since the two statements disagree, both cannot be absolute truths. Each group may consider their own view to be absolute. But at least one is wrong. However, we can say that both statements are true in relation to each group's core beliefs.

horizontal rule

Copyright 1999 to 2005 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Latest update: 2005-MAY-29
Written by: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)


horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or to the Absolute truth menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?


Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.