Twitter icon


Facebook icon

ABOUT THIS SITE
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD of this site
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
-Christian definition
 -Shared beliefs
 -Handling change
 -Bible topics
 -Bible inerrancy
 -Bible harmony
 -Interpret the Bible
 -Persons
 -Beliefs & creeds
 -Da Vinci code
 -Revelation, 666
 -Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment

Same-sex marriage

Homosexuality
Human rights
Gays in the military
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

 

 

Religious Tolerance logo

Religious information

Beliefs by U.S. adults towards persons
of various religions, genders, sexual
orientations, etc: from 1937 until now:

Stained glass window 1

Part 2:

horizontal rule

This is a continuation from Part 1

horizontal rule

Americans improved their view of Muslims after 9/11:

The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press conducted a public opinion poll among 1,500 adults on 2001-NOV-13 to 19. The margin of error is within 3 percentage points. The results were surprising:
bullet

The percentage of Americans with a favorable view of Muslims rose from 45% in May to 59% in November.


bullet

The percentage of conservative Republicans with a favorable view of Muslims rose from 35% to 64%!


bullet

"Most respondents -- 89%--completely or mostly rejected the idea that the [911 terrorist] attacks were a sign God was not protecting the United States. Evangelists Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson had made that argument, then later apologized for the remarks." 2

horizontal rule

Beliefs about the causes of poverty and homelessness:

A 2017-MAY poll by the Washington Post and the Kaiser Family Foundation asked 1,686 U.S. adults whether they felt the most common cause of a person's poverty was due to their lack of effort or due to circumstances beyond their control. 3

There is no overall consensus in the country. Opinion varied widely among different religious and political groups:

Group Due to lack of effort Due to external circumstances
All Christians
46%
about 49%
White Evangelicals
53%
41%
Roman Catholics
50%
45%
Non - Christians
29%
about 66%
Agnostics, Atheists, or NOTAs*
31%
65%
Democrats
26%
72%
Republicans
63%
32%

* The term "NOTAs" refers to persons who are NOT Affiliated with a religion.

The article states that the margin of error on the results is ±4 percentage points.

Albert Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, said:

"There’s a strong Christian impulse to understand poverty as deeply rooted in morality -- often, as the Bible makes clear, in unwillingness to work, in bad financial decisions or in broken family structures. The Christian world view is saying that all poverty is due to sin, though that doesn’t necessarily mean the sin of the person in poverty. In the Garden of Eden, there would have been no poverty. In a fallen world, there is poverty."

horizontal rule

Summary:

These data indicate that, on average:

bulletAmericans are generally prejudiced against non-Judeo-Christian religions.
bullet Churchgoers are more prejudiced than are non-Christians.

bulletBorn-again Christians are more prejudiced than the average churchgoer.
bulletThere is a gradual lessening of prejudice in the country.

bulletPrejudice against Blacks, Catholics, Jews, and Women (at least as presidential candidates), has been essentially wiped out in recent years.

bulletPrejudice against homosexuals has dropped significantly in the past two decades, but remains high.

bulletPrejudice against Atheists has dropped slightly, but remains extremely high.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link

horizontal rule

 

Our opinion about the future of religious peace in North America:

Many conservative Christians believe that the world is in its last days -- the world-as-we-know-it is about to come to an end. They anticipate that the first sign of this transition will be the arrival of Jesus Christ in the sky, and the rapture of all born-again Christians to be with Jesus. In 1999, when this essay was originally written, many conservative Christians expected that the rapture was imminent; they anticipated it in their very near future -- perhaps at the start of the year 2000. We were concerned that if none of these events happened, that the resultant mass disappointment might fuel a backlash against believers in minority religions.

There was a very common belief during the 19th century that Jesus' return was being delayed until after most of the world was converted to Christianity. Some Christians still follow that belief. We feared that Atheists, other secularists, and followers of non-Christian religions might be blamed for three delays: of Jesus' return, the rapture, and Armageddon. This blame might quickly evolve into violence.

On 2000-JAN-1, end time events did not come to pass. We were pleasantly surprised. People expecting Jesus' return seem to have adjusted to the disappointment without a lot of distress. Conservative religious leaders still refer to the world being in its last days, but fewer are predicting exact times for the end events.

We remain concerned about the long-term future of religious peace in North America. A recent study shows that Christianity is in decline in the U.S. The percentage of American adults who identify themselves as Christian has dropped from 86% in 1990 to 77% in 2001, and to 76.0% in 2008 and to 70.6% in 2014, 4 This is an average slippage of 6.4 percentage points a decade! Meanwhile, the percentage of persons who don't consider themselves to be affiliated with any organized religion is rapidly growing. Some non-Christian religions are also growing quickly. Some reported that the number of Wiccans, for example, was doubling every 30 months.

We are not certain that such a transition can be attained peacefully without active programs by governments and by the main religious groups to promote respect among their membership for followers of other religions. What is needed are programs to teach one of the corollaries of the Golden Rule: that we are to treat all persons with respect -- even those who hold beliefs different from ourselves. It is not important whether we accept the beliefs of others as valid, or reject them as false. What is important is that we not attack, discriminate against, or oppress "others."

Without such pro-active programs, we expect that there will be growing frictions, mainly between the followers of the dominant religion -- Christianity -- and persons who either identify themselves as non-believers in any organized religion, or as followers of minority religions.

These tensions could be exploited by some political leaders. This happened in the break-away areas of the former Yugoslavia, where long-standing religious frictions were manipulated by a small number of political and religious leaders, and used to fuel atrocities, crimes against humanity and genocide. No part of the world is immune from these tendencies

horizontal rule

A possible cure:

Most organized religions tend to teach that their beliefs alone are true, and that other religions are, to various degrees, false. Some even teach that other religions are Satanic in nature. These beliefs can lead to prejudice against other faith groups, which can degenerate into violence and oppression. However, all major religions also teach an Ethic of Reciprocity. This is the Golden Rule in Christianity. They teach the importance of treating others as you would be wished to be treated in return. One implication of such an ethic is that others should be granted religious freedom -- they should be allowed to freely follow their own, different, spiritual paths as a fundamental human right without experiencing oppression, discrimination and attacks. 

If religious groups were to lay greater stress on the Ethic of Reciprocity contained within their religious texts, then religious prejudice should decrease markedly. Churches could include such secular documents as the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the American Bill of Rights, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, etc. in their tolerance classes. Without such a pro-active program, some of their followers may fall back on some of the intolerant passages in their own religious texts for guidance.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link:

horizontal rule

Do these poll results indicate religious bigotry and intolerance?

Religious prejudice is not as simple as racism, sexism, homophobia or xenophobia. Other factors are involved when we consider religion:

bullet Many born-again Christians believe that the normal destination for people after death are the torture pits of Hell; only the small minority of humans who are born-again will attain heaven. Any faith group that does not motivate people to repent of their sins and trust Jesus as Lord and Savior -- i.e. to be "saved" -- would, in their view, have a negative impact on its members, and thus on society as a whole. So, empathic concern for followers of other religions may contribute greatly to the low opinion that born-again Christians have of other faiths. Christian churchgoers' dim view of other religions may be largely based on their belief about salvation, and concern for the fate of those who are not born-again, rather than simple religious intolerance.

bullet On this web site, we define religious intolerance as taking a negative action against a person or group who follows a different faith. Actions might take many forms: discrimination, ridicule, oppression, advocating restrictions on human rights, economic attack, physical attack, etc. In some areas of the world, it involves imprisonment, execution, torture, and mass murder -- occasionally genocide. Without such action, then it is our opinion that no religious intolerance has occurred. A negative view of another religion is not religious intolerance. It merely has the potential to develop into intolerance at some time in the future. Although prejudice is high against some minority religions in North America, there is relatively little overt action which has been taken. Three major exceptions are:

bulletVandalism and threats against Jewish synagogues and cemeteries by anti-semites and neo-Nazis.

bulletVandalism and threats against Islamic mosques.

bullet The promotion of discrimination against Wiccans and other Neo pagans by political leaders in the U.S. This rapidly declined during the late 20th century.

horizontal rule

Related essays:

bulletHow Christians view other religions

bulletHow Roman Catholics view other denominations and religions

horizontal rule

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1. Stained glass window, ID 97286512, a public domain photo downloaded from Dreamstime.co
  2. "Poll finds improved view of U.S. Muslims," Associated Press, 2001-DEC-07, at: http://www2.ljworld.com/
  3. Julie Zauzmer, "Poll: Christians are more than twice as likely to blame a person’s poverty on lack of effort," Denver Post, 2017-AUG-03, at: http://www.denverpost.com/
  4. "Changing U.S. Religious Landscape" (Chart), Pew Forum, 2015-MAY-12, at: http://www.pewforum.org/

Site navigation:

 Home page > Christianity > Christian history, belief... > Polls > here

 Home page > Religious info. > Basic info. > Polls > here

 Home page > Religious hatred > here

 Home page > Religious info. > Basic info. > Polls > here

horizontal rule

Copyright 1999 to 2017 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally written: 1999-DEC-8
Latest update: 2017-AUG-07
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)

Sponsored link


horizontal rule

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?


Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.