| About this site |
| About us |
| Our beliefs |
| Your first visit? |
| Contact us |
| External links |
| Good books |
| Visitor essays |
| Our forum |
| New essays |
| Other site features |
| Buy a CD |
| Vital notes |
| Non-theistic... |
| Atheism |
| Agnosticism |
| Humanism |
| Other |
| Spiritual/ethics |
| Spirituality |
| Morality/ethics |
| Absolute truth |
| Peace/conflict |
| Attaining peace |
| Religious tolerance |
| Religious hatred |
| Religious conflict |
| Religious violence |
| Laws and news |
| Religious laws |
| Religious news |
|
|
 | In the field of biology, many social and religious conservatives are committed to creation science that is derived from a literal interpretation of Genesis. Many liberals fully accept the theory of evolution: that species evolved from primitive to complex forms of life, culminating in humans |
| In the field of jurisprudence, most social conservatives interpret constitutions as enduring documents. They are called strict constructionists or originalists. They view the documents in the context of the lives and beliefs of the original authors. Many liberals view constitutions as living documents, whose meaning evolves as the culture changes. |
| In the field of religion, Christian conservatives tend to consider the Bible as the inerrant Word of God, written by authors who were inspired by God. It is generally to be interpreted literally. Most liberal Christians look upon the Bible as a historical document many of whose writers were limited by having lived in a tribal culture during a pre-scientific era. Liberals see a need to continually reinterpret the Bible in the light of recent scientific discoveries in human sexuality. |
These two options -- seeking stability or seeking change -- are seen in the ways with which Christians and their denominations establish their religious beliefs and policies. Most use some combination of the following eight criteria:
| Specific references in the Bible as they interpret their meaning |
| General biblical statements and themes |
| Actions of leaders in the Bible |
| Church traditions |
| Continuing revelation |
| Scientific findings |
| Personal experience. |
| Cultural influences. |
A major difference between those Christians who take a static or a dynamic view of doctrine is seen in the weighting given to each of these criteria. For example:
| Conservative Christians tend to cite specific passages from the Bible, like the six "clobber" passages that they feel are related to homosexuality. Liberals often discuss general statements and themes, like love and justice. |
| Conservatives tend to give greater weight to church tradition, while liberals stress scientific findings and personal experience. |
| Conservative Christians stress a foundational doctrine from the Protestant Reformation: "sola Scriptura" -- that the Bible is the only source of doctrine. Liberals tend to weigh information from many sources. |
| Culture often has a major impact on doctrine, although its influence is often not fully recognized. |
And so, we find a conflict over morality and doctrine between:
| Conservatives who particularly value stability as implied in Jude 1:3: "... ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints" and |
| Religious liberals who believe that the Church's statements on morality and doctrine must be continually updated as information becomes available from extra-biblical sources, and from new interpretations of biblical passages. |
In the past, the Anglican Communion has faced many crises over morality and doctrine. The debate over the abolition of human slavery almost split the church during the 18th century. In the 20th century, the Communion was able to reverse its course over the use of contraceptives. However, there is a lack of consensus on sexually related matters among the provinces:
| The role of women in the Communion: Historically, the Anglican Communion has been a sexist institution, refusing to ordain women. The concept of a partly female priesthood caused a major crisis in the 1978 Lambeth Conference. It was only In 1998, when the General Assembly of the Nippon Sei Ko Kai (Anglican Church in Japan) voted to accept female priests, that the majority of the 38 provinces in the Anglican Communion considered women candidates for ordination. A large minority of provinces still deny qualified women as priests, as do a few dioceses in the Episcopal Church, USA. A handful of provinces have consecrated women as bishops; most still refuse. Until the Right Reverend Katharine Jefferts Schori was made primate-elect of the Episcopal Church, USA in 2006-JUN, all primates had been male. The count is now 37 males and one female. The Anglican Communion has been able to survive the shift from a sexist to non-sexist institution. Clearly, women still have a long distance to go to reach equality with men. |
| The role of homosexuals in the communion: Historically, the Anglican Communion has also been a homophobic institution, refusing to consider homosexuals as equals. The provinces in North America -- the Episcopal Church, USA and the Anglican Church of Canada -- have lowered many of the barriers to equal treatment of gays and lesbians. Some dioceses bless loving, committed, same-sex relationships. Gene Robinson, a homosexual in a committed relationship, was elected bishop of New Hampshire and had his election confirmed by the General Convention. This has led to a crisis in the worldwide Anglican Communion and in the two North American provinces. |
The crisis over homosexuality reached a critical stage in 2006. By early 2007, symptoms of a formal schism in the Communion had surfaced.
Essays on the schism within the Anglican Communion:
| 2006-May to August |
| 2006- September to December |
| 2007- January to August |
| 2007-September to December |
|
Home > Christianity > Mainline Christian conflicts > Episcopal > Homosexuality > here |
|
Home > Conflict > Homosexuality > Churches > Episcopal > Homosexuality > here |
|
Home>Conflicts>Homosexuality>Rel. groups>Chr. groups>Anglican> Homosexuality>here |
Copyright © 2007 by Ontario Consultants on
Religious Tolerance
Original posting: 2007-FEB-26
Latest update: 2007-OCT-12
Author: B.A. Robinson
|
|
