|
The Globe and Mail reported on 1998-JUN-25 that some of the banks of Canada have reneged on a promise to the Government of Canada (and thus to the people of Canada) to hire more employees with disabilities. 1 In 1988, a coalition of disability groups filed complaints with the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) against all 5 chartered banks, and four other federally regulated financial companies. The Bank of Montreal and Royal Bank of Canada were congratulated at that time for agreeing to negotiate settlements. The Bank of Montreal promised to increase the percentage of people with disabilities to 10.2% of the total hired by 1998. The Royal Bank agreed to a 12.5% target. They both agreed to aim for a workforce where 6.5% of the employees had a disability. This is "the same fraction of the working population identified in the 1961 Census as being disabled but ready and able to hold down a job." 10 years have passed. These two banks appear to have missed their commitments. Their hiring rates of disabled people have nose-dived. Bank of Montreal
Royal Bank of Canada
* Expressed as a percentage of total new hirings. The CHRC has asked the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) to investigate the matter. Under a previously unused part of the Canadian human rights law, a breach of a settlement can be prosecuted in Federal Court. Gerald Savard, director general of the CHRC's antidiscrimination programs branch commented: "At the end of the day, we're seeing a situation where they are going backward in terms of the hiring rates they have for people with disabilities, as opposed to moving forward...The commission is now in a situation where it has to pursue its enforcement options under the statute. And the banks are on on notice that activity is now in the process of being activated..." David Baker, is a representative of the Disabled People for Employment Equity Human Rights Group - the organization that brought the original charges. He said: "Common sense would indicate the banks should have been leading in terms of their capacity to accommodate people with disabilities." The banks claim that they have made major efforts in the past to search out and hire people with disabilities. Also, they stated that many of their employees refuse to declare themselves disabled. So their actual levels are higher that the figures show. Meanwhile, every large city in the country has an office of the Ministry of Community and Social Services (or an equivalent ministry). Each office has many employees, each with caseloads of hundreds of persons with disability. Some of these people have talents and abilities which are going to waste. Unfortunately, the maximum fine for reneging on an agreement is $50,000. This is a miniscule fine in comparison to the profits that these banks make each year - over 1 billion dollars each.
Sponsored link:
A Catch-22 Situation:The percentage of persons with disability is lower in the banks than in the general population. However, the methodology imposed by federal government legislation under-reports their number. The only employees who are counted must volunteer that they:
Thus, a person with a disability who is fairly treated by her/his employer might not feel "disadvantaged in employment." They might well answer "no" to the second question and thus not be counted as having a disability. So, as an employer becomes more enlightened and fair to its employees, the lower will be their reported number of persons with disabilities.
You might consider:
Recent Developments:
References:
|
|