The U.S.
Supreme Court, in a close 5 - 4 decision, overturned an earlier New Jersey
Supreme Court ruling that had found that the Boy Scouts were a public accommodation.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the BSA is a
private organization and thus may set its own moral code. Forcing it to accept gays would violate its constitutional right to
freedom of association.
Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote for
the majority. He said in part: "The Boy Scouts asserts that
homosexual conduct is inconsistent with the values it seeks to instill.
[Requiring the Scouts to accept homosexual scoutmasters] would
significantly burden the organization's right to oppose or disfavor
homosexual conduct." He did acknowledge that homosexuality
had gained greater social acceptance. However, he wrote that "This
is scarcely an argument for denying First Amendment protection to
those who refuse to accept these views. The First Amendment protects
expression, be it of the popular variety or not."
Thus the BSA can now legally
discriminate on the basis of gender, age, sexual orientation, religious
belief or any other basis. They do not have to follow local, state or federal anti-discrimination
laws. One interesting implication of the court ruling is that the BSA will now
have much more difficulty when they try to gain access to schools or
government facilities, or when they try to tap into government
resources. In the past, they had held scout jamborees on army bases;
this may not be possible in the future.
The court decision only applies to gay scout
leaders, "...and does not directly confront the question of
whether the Scouts may ban gays from general membership..." 1
Conservative religious groups applauded the decision; civil
rights groups were appalled. Two immediate reactions to the court
decision were:
Jan LaRue, spokesperson for the Family Research Council,
wrote: "It is not the role of government to decide who
should share a pup tent with the Scouts, who is fit to be a
Scoutmaster, and what message the Scouts should deliver about
homosexuality."
Ralph G. Neas, spokesperson for People For the American Way
Foundation wrote: "The court’s decision permits the Boy
Scouts to hide their discrimination behind the First Amendment and
rejects the right of New Jersey to create a just society for its
citizens. The Court has allowed freedom of association to become a
tool by which groups unfairly exclude a group of Americans."