Denial of funding to the Boy Scouts of America (BSA): Year 2000 to now
Part 1: Denial of funding by United Way agencies

Sponsored link.

The United Way:
The United Way is a group of autonomous local agencies that organize
individual funding drives in their communities -- typically on a yearly basis.
Each United Way then funds individual local agencies with the money that they
have collected. This arrangement has a number of advantages:
 | It helps the individual agencies. Without United Way funding, each would
have to dissipate a great deal of their resources to organize a separate
funding drive.
|
 | It benefits the public who would otherwise be faced with many dozens of
requests for support each year.
|
 | It reduces overhead costs. One funding drive costs less to organize than
perhaps 80 individual drives in a community. Thus, a larger percentage of the donations end
up in the hands of the agencies. |
There is a growing movement within the United Way to deny funding to agencies
that discriminate in the provision of services, employment practices or board
membership selection on the basis of gender, race, religion, sexual orientation,
gender identity, and other grounds. An increasing number of United Way agencies have pulled their funding for
the Boy Scouts of America in their community because of the BSA's policies of
discrimination on the basis of religion and sexual orientation. These included the United Ways of:
 | CA: Santa Cruz Count, Bay Area, and Silicon Valley
|
 | CT: Greater New Haven
|
 | FL: Broward County, including the city of Ft. Lauderdale: They pulled
$130,000 in funding for 42,000 boys because the South Florida Boy
Scouts would not sign a non-discrimination policy. According to a
report in the Miami Herald in 2001-JUL, after dialoging with the United
Way and a local gay-positive group, the Scouts decided to:
 |
Abandon seeking of public funding,
|
 | Abandon recruitment in public schools,
|
 | Develop a training program for its leaders to help them deal more
sensitively with gay youth.
|
 |
Sue any group that uses the Boy Scout's name to further its
political agenda. According to Jeffrie Herrmann, executive director of
the South Florida Boy Scouts Council, some conservative Christian
groups were trying "to confuse the public by using our name to
gain support for their causes. We are not involved in these petition
drives." 1 |
An anonymous donor donated $200,000 so that the local Scouts could
continue their policies of discrimination intact.
|
 | MA: The United Way of Massachusetts Bay dialoged with the
Boston Minuteman [Boy Scouts] Council and reached agreement in
2001-JUL that the Council would adopt a policy of nondiscrimination on the
basis of sexual orientation. 1
|
 |
ME: Greater Portland.
|
 | NJ: Somerset County
|
 | MN:
 | In an attempt to forestall the cancellation of funding, the Four
Lakes Boy Scouts Council made available a new Scout patch called "Respect
for all." To qualify for the patch, scouts had to learn about
different family structures, including gay and lesbian families. They
also issued a resolution stating that they disagreed with the anti-gay
discrimination policy of the national BSA. However, the Council
continues to follow the national BSA policies.
|
 | In 2001-NOV, the Gamehaven and Gateway Boy Scouts Councils
reached an agreement with the United Way of the Greater Winona Area to
violate national BSA policy and to "not discriminate regarding
someone’s sexual orientation." 1 |
|
 | RI: Southeastern New England. |

Sponsored link:

By early 2002, a number of Boy Scout councils had taken action to defy
their national body's policy and lessen discrimination on the basis of sexual
orientation. Some have quietly signed pledges with their local United Way to
comply with the latter's non-discrimination policies. Others have drafted
their own non-discrimination policies.
Other councils, appear to have adopted a "don't ask - don't tell" policy, similar to that of the U.S. Armed Forces at the time:
 | On 2001-DEC-17, the Associated Press reported that
the Green
Mountain Boy Scouts Council in Vermont council had adopted a policy that "unlike national rules, permits gay
Scouts and Scout leaders." Green
Mountain Council Executive Director Jerry Lupien denied the report.
|
 | In 2001, Boy Scouts of America's Milwaukee County Council Boy
Scouts officials signed the United Way of Greater Milwaukee's
non-discrimination policy, but only after having first crossed out the
sexual orientation phrase. In 2002, they signed the full statement that covers:
"... any
program or agency that discriminates in the provision of services on the
basis of race, color, religion, national origin, handicap, sex, or sexual
orientation."
The Council had recently adopted the "don't
ask - don't tell" policy.
Michael Childers, Scout executive for the Council, said that they
have been able to harmonize the apparently conflicting rules of the BSA
and United Way because they do not ask members or leaders whether
they are homosexual. However, if they found out that a youth member or a
leader had a homosexual orientation, they would automatically eject him from
the organization. When asked whether that wouldn't violate the United Way
policy, he said:
"It's not like we're trying to discover it or make it
an issue."
Neil Albrecht, executive director of the Milwaukee
Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Transgender Community Center, mentioned that
Childer's said that the comments were "discouraging and disheartening."
Albrecht said:
"It should be alarming to the United Way. I would
question the sincerity [of signing the United Way policy]."
Gregg
Shields, national spokesman for the Boy Scouts of America, said:
"The
national policy is that the Boy Scouts of America have always stood for
and taught traditional American family values and an avowed homosexual is
not a role model for those values, and accordingly we don't extend
leadership to homosexuals. We don't force these values on anyone. We are a
volunteer organization."
He neglected to mention that the anti-gay
policy of discrimination extends beyond the BSA leadership to youth
members as well. 5 |


The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above
essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.
- Candi Cushman, "Who's
Selling Out the Scouts?," Citizen, at:
http://www.family.org/
- "Florida Boy Scouts under attack," Focus on the Family,
at: http://www.family.org/
- Daniel Costello, "Some backers pull Boy Scouts' funding after high
courts ruling on gay scouts," Wall Street Journal, 2000-AUG-24
- "Florida Boy Scouts under attack," Focus on the Family,
at: http://www.family.org/
- Jessica McBride, "Scouts use 'Don't ask, don't tell'; Approach allows
council to sign United Way anti-bias policy," Journal Sentinel Online
(Milwaukee, WI), at:
http://www.jsonline.com/
- Mark Sherman, "Boy Scouts face setback in Supreme Court,"
Associated Press, 2006-OCT-16, at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
- Zach Wahls, "Intel: Stop funding discrimination!," Change.org, at: http://www.change.org
- Camille Beredjick, "UPS quits funding Boy Scouts over anti-gay policy," GayWrites.org, 2012-NOV-13, at: http://gaywrites.org/
- "Merck Foundation Severs Boy Scouts Funding Over Anti-Gay Policy," Huffington Post, 2012-DEC-10, at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
- Rich Ferrato, "Merck Foundation suspends funding to Boy Scouts of America until ban on gay scouts and leaders ends," Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, 2012-DEC-10, at: http://www.glaad.org/


Copyright © 1999 to 2012 by Ontario Consultants on
Religious Tolerance.
Originally published on 1999-AUG-9
Latest updated: 2012-DEC-10
Author: B.A. Robinson

Sponsored link

|