|
What motivates the CCM?:People in the CCM seem heavily dedicated to their work of raising public awareness of "cults". Every group within the CCM that we have studied believes that:
Sponsored link:
Quality control within the CCM:CCM literature varies greatly in quality, objectivity and balance. Some exhibit careful analysis and critique. Others appear to be poorly researched and filled with factual errors, and even hate. We have documented some really vicious hate sites directed against two groups: Wiccans and homosexuals. The Evangelical Ministries to New Religions (EMNR) is "a consortium of Christians in North America, seeking to help people distinguish authentic from in-authentic Christianity and strengthen evangelical Christian ministries to new religionists and cultists." 1 One of their goals is to "Maintain worthy theological, ethical, and missiological standards" among its members. They are run by an all-male board of directors who are counter cult movement leaders and founders, seminary professors and authors. They publish a Manual of Ethical and Doctrinal Standards which requires its members to adhere to a high level of personal integrity. With reference to their descriptions of other faith groups, they recommend the following:
By "non-Christian religions and systems" they would apparently include many groups which consider themselves to be Christian, such as Roman Catholicism, the Mormon Church, Jehovah's Witnesses, etc. Topics at their year 2002 conference include Astrology, Goth movement, Falun Gong, International Churches of Christ, Islam, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Neo-Nazism, Paganism, Postmodernism, Religious Pluralism, Scientology, Soka Gakkai, and Wicca. After visiting many of the CCM web sites, it is obvious that CCM groups rarely if go outside their group to have their essays critiqued. Most articles on on the Unitarian Universalist Association (UUA) contain major errors that a quick review by a few active Unitarian Universalists (UUs) could easily correct. Without outside help, it is almost impossible for an author to write an accurate, balanced, and clear essay about a religion that is not her/his own. The results can be quite comical. Using the UUA example again, many CCMs:
All of these are false statements. Because CCM groups do not generally have their writings reviewed by outside authorities, the quality of their material suffers, along with their credibility. Many CCM articles about Wicca and other Neopagan religions are quite ludicrous. They often contain material that can be traced back to the Witch burning times of the 15th to 18th centuries, and which bears no resemblance to Neopagan religions as they are practiced today.
What the CCM believes that "cults" teach:Counter-Cult groups frequently quote Biblical passages that warn of false prophets that will arise and confuse many. They believe that these warnings refer to present-day cults. Many religious liberals believe that at least some of these biblical references target Gnostic Christianity -- one of the main threats to Pauline Christianity in the early years of Christianity. Among the CCM's favorite biblical verses are:
The Darkness to Light web site contains an essay titled "The Characteristics of a Cult: Theological Characteristics." It states that a cult's teaching includes one or more of the following theological beliefs:
An essay "What makes a church or group non-Christian?," at the Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry specifies that a faith group is a cult if it denies any of the following:
Some "cults" are Christian groups, like the Mormons, who add an extra book or books to the Bible. At least one faith group, the Jehovah's Witnesses, has modified the text of the Bible to produce its own translation which agrees more closely with their theological beliefs. Others are accused of developing non-orthodox interpretations of Bible passages: they take passages out of context, pick and choose certain verses while ignoring others; mistranslate key words, etc.
Reference:
Copyright © 1997 to 2001 incl., 2003 and 2004 by Ontario
Consultants on Religious Tolerance |
|