An expose of corruption in the
faith-based initiative program
One of the main components of President Bush's compassionate conservatism
philosophy is his faith-based initiative program. It funnels federal tax dollars
to local religious groups to help them provide services to the poor, to addicted
persons and to others in need of support. While Bush was governor of Texas, he
became convinced that churches could do a better job of providing such services
than the government.
With the release of a major book and a detailed GAO study during the
summer/fall of 2006, the Faith-based Initiative program may be doomed.
Insider's book exposes corruption of Faith-based Initiative program:
According to AANEWS on 2006-OCT-17:
A disturbing report from the GAO and a scathing book penned by a former
faith-based office staffer may signal the end for the controversial effort to
fund religious charity with public money.
President Bush's federal faith-based initiative could be in trouble following
a critical government report and a new book hitting stores with charges that the
White House manipulated religious conservatives for political gain.
"Tempting Faith: An Insider Story of Political Seduction"
1 was penned
by [David] Kuo, who served as number-two man at the White House Office of
Faith-Based and Community Initiatives from 2001-2003. Kuo's
allegations have created a furor over Bush administration policy, and
paint a picture of the key White House officials including deputy
chief of staff Karl Rove, as condescending and cynical about
evangelical Christians. That attitude, however, did not prevent the
Bush election machine from staging large events to promote the
faith-based initiative in areas where important House and Senate races
were taking place leading into the 2002 elections.
According to Kuo, Christian leaders like televangelist Pat Robertson
were referred to as "nuts," "goofy" and "ridiculous," although their
political support was always courted.
"National Christian leaders received hugs and smiles in person and
then were dismissed behind their backs..." Kuo wrote. He added that
on orders from Ken Mehlman, at the time Bush's director of public
affairs, the White House faith-based office staged conferences in
areas where Republicans faced daunting re-election challenges.
"The office decided to hold roundtable events for threatened
incumbents with faith and community leaders, using the aura of our
White House power to get a diverse group of faith and community
leaders to a 'non-partisan' event discussing how best to help poor
people in their area," Kuo revealed.
The White House quickly denied Kuo's charges. Press secretary Tony
Snow first said that he had not seen the books, and then released a
written statement insisting that there had been no attempt to exploit
the faith-based initiative to score political points and help
Republican candidates. 2
It may be worth noting that the book was released on 2006-OCT-16, almost
exactly three weeks before the mid-term elections. This may have been a
coincidence. However, if those responsible for the book's timing wanted to
maximize its negative impact on the Republican party's chances in the election,
OCT-16 would probably be an optimum date to release the book.
Conrad Goeringer, Editor of AANEWS wrote an article " 'Tempting Faith' -- The
real case of denial about the religion tax in America." He writes:
David Kuo has written a book, "Tempting Faith: An Inside Story of
Political Seduction," that has grabbed headlines and fueled a firestorm
of controversy with its allegations about the federal faith-based
Kuo charges, for instance, that prominent White House officials like Karl
Rove, masquerading behind public support of the effort to distribute
hundreds of millions of dollars to religious groups in order to administer
religion-saturated social programs, mocked evangelical Christians behind
their backs, and suborned this initiative on behalf of "compassionate
conservatism" into a cynical campaign to win elections for Republicans.
Churches and evangelical leaders who supported GOP candidates, along with
political kleptomaniacs like Tom DeLay, benefited from this government
There were "conferences" organized by the White House Office for Faith-Based
and Community Initiatives in districts where Republicans desperately needed
the support of evangelical voters.
It was a blatant quid-pro-quo. Grants to operate lucrative social programs
and proselytize the neediest, most vulnerable elements in our society in the
process, seemed to appear in tandem with those ballot initiatives against
gay marriage, or where candidates for public office were screeching the most
about "family values" and bringing the country "back to God."
In all of the buzz about the Kuo book, however, there are some glaring
points no one seems willing to discuss. ...
[A] shortcoming in Mr. Kuo's book is the implicit message that the federal
faith-based initiative was potentially a sound and appropriate social
experiment that fell captive to bureaucratic dysfunction and lustful
political ambition. He and stalwart supporters of the program may argue
that with sufficient oversight and in the hands of a less-craven and power
hungry administration, the effort to deal with social ills by distributing
tax money to churches and other houses of worship is not only worthy but
We must disagree here. Even if the faith-based initiative somehow avoided
the problems cited by Mr. Kuo or enumerated in the recent Government
Accounting Office report on accountability and oversight within the program,
it remains a constitutionally flawed and unfair idea. A "better"
faith-based initiative, whatever the bureaucratic criteria may be, still
extorts money from millions of Americans who are Atheists, Freethinkers,
Humanists or some other type of nonbeliever. It takes money from those who
do not embrace religious creeds, and gives it to churches and other
faith-based groups. It crosses a constitutional line dividing the spheres
of church and state, ultimately promotes religious faith, and amounts to a
"religion tax" on our citizenry.
The faith-based initiative should be dismantled not because it is
organizationally flawed, or lacks sufficient guidelines, or requires further
tinkering, but because it is unconstitutional and ethically wrong. It does
not matter that more churches, mosques or temples have yet to endorse it or
participate. Government has no business subsidizing religious groups in
such a fashion, even under the guise of "compassionate conservatism." If
the notion of "religious liberty" and the principle of freedom from
religious coercion mean anything, it must be a declaration that no man or
woman may be compelled by the state to believe in a particular creed, join a
certain congregation, or support a religious organization (and religious
belief in general) through taxation.
Mr. Kuo's book and the other revelations about the faith-based initiative
are welcome reminders that religion and politics can be an unstable and
socially deleterious alliance. It should surprise no one that the Bush
social experiment ultimately succumbed to political ambition and the hunt
for votes. Indeed, it was clear from the moment that President Bush
conjured the faith-based scheme into existence -- it has never been granted
approval from Congress -- using his power of Executive Orders, that the
coterie of priests, pastors, mullahs and other religious leaders supporting
him were hard pressed to trade the votes of their congregations for more of
the public coin. It was vote begging and vote buying, pure and simple. ...
Despite his cynicism, Karl Rove knows that there are about 4 million
evangelical votes that he has his fellow political strategists need in order
to keep their party in office. Indeed, the new-found enthusiasm of many
Democrats like Mr. Barak Obama who want to jump in to the risky business of
wooing evangelical and other religious voters, is testament to the power of
blind faith at the ballot box. Robertson, Falwell, Dobson, D. James Kennedy
all wield considerable power within the Republican Party and on Capitol
Hill, and that influence cannot and should not be ignored.
That fact, too, is yet another reason to dismantle the faith-based
initiative at the federal, state and local level. Atheists and other
nonreligious American will never have a fair playing field to support public
policies that affirm the separation of church and state if we are being
taxed to fund theocratic social programs, organizations and values. Mr. Kuo
exposes much of what is wrong when government subsidizes religion with
public money. It is up to us to successfully argue the rest of the case
against the "religion tax" in America. 3
Critical GAO report cites problems with performance, and accountability:
According to AANEWS on 2006-OCT-17:
The allegations in "Tempting Faith," however, are not the first
criticisms about how the Bush initiative is operating.
In June, 2006, the General Accounting Office (GAO), which serves as
the investigative watch-dog agency for Congress, issued a stinging
report looking into monitoring and accountability issues in the
federal faith-based initiative. It challenged many of the claims made
by supporters of the program -- that churches and other houses of
worship can deliver social services "faster, better and cheaper"
than secular counterparts, and still remain within legal boundaries.
The report found widespread evidence that the government has yet to
establish a consistent and thorough process to monitor grant
recipients and gauge the effectiveness of their programs. In
addition, GAO investigators discovered that a shocking number of
agencies benefiting from the largesse of faith-based grants were, in
fact, mixing religion with their social programs.
Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA), who along with Rep. George Miller
(D-CA) asked the GAO to look into the White House program, said
"The Bush administration has failed to develop standards to verify
that faith-based organizations aren't using federal funds to pay for
inherently religious activity or to provide services on the basis of
The report, for instance, cited the example where four
FBOs (Faith-Based Organizations)"
"that provided voluntary religious
activities did not separate in terms of time or location some
religious activities from federally funded program services."
Researchers also noted that there was:
"Little information ...
available to assess progress toward another long-term goal of
improving participant outcomes because outcome-based evaluations for
many pilot programs have not begun..."
Ellen Johnson, President of American Atheists said that both the GAO
report and the revelations in Mr. Kuo's book confirm fears that have
been leveled by critics of the Bush faith-based initiative. She said:
"It shouldn't surprise anyone that with all of this money being made
available and little fiscal oversight, the faith-based initiative is
out of control. We're paying the price now for a
government program that started off as a questionable and
unconstitutional experiment, and has ended up being a tool for
partisan politics." 2