|
But it is probably impossible to have any large group of adults reach a consensus on precisely who is a "Christian," and who is not. There are on the order of 1,500 denominations, para-church organizations, and other groups in the U.S. who consider themselves to be Christian. 1 Added to this are thousands of independent Christian congregations which are not affiliated with a denomination. One could assemble a random group of adults and ask each individual to sort the 1,000 groups into two piles: those which are "truly" Christian, and those that are not. In some cases, an individual will select their own faith group as the only truly Christian denomination, and define all of the other 999 as sub-Christian, quasi-Christian, or non-Christian. Other individuals might say that all 1,000 denominations are Christian. Most likely, a given individual will select most of the 1,000 groups as Christian, and reject the others. There is no possibility of reaching a common definition which would identify which groups are "truly" Christian.
Problems arising from exclusion and inclusion:This web site uses an inclusive definition of Christianity -- the same one that is used by public opinion polls and government census offices: Anyone who seriously, thoughtfully, sincerely, prayerfully considers themselves to be a Christian is considered a Christian for the purpose of our essays. The alternative is religious exclusion. This involves defining some individuals or their denominations as sub-Christian, quasi-Christian or non-Christian. This approach has led to serious conflicts. In some countries, such as Bosnia and Northern Ireland, discord has resulted in mass murder and even genocide. Recent religiously based conflicts throughout the world have shown that if the political and/or economic climate is highly stressed, some believers find that it can be only a series of small transitions to go from "You are different from us," to "You are not a real Christian," to "You are sub-human," to "You have no right to live." Fortunately, there is a great reservoir of tolerance in North America that has prevented intra-Christian and inter-religious friction from degenerating into widespread violence. However, three trends may cause the religious climate to change in the future:
We may be in for some tough times ahead.
Reaction of visitors at our web site to our inclusive definition:We receive many Emails which criticize the excessive inclusiveness of our web site. They complain that we accept too many denominations as "Christian." One person recently wrote that "Roman Catholicism is a Pagan religion, and is not part of Christianity." Another, stated that "Mormons are Gnostics, not Christians." Other readers have objected to the inclusion of The Family, Jehovah's Witnesses, the Unification Church, United Church, Unity Church, and many other faith groups as Christian denominations. At best, the E-mailers consider those groups to be sub-Christian, or quasi-Christian. At worse, they are considered destructive cults. These visitors are saying that they thoughtfully and sincerely believe that people whose beliefs are too different from theirs are not really Christians. This is not a rash decision on their part. Many are totally convinced of the accuracy of their position after many years of Bible study, perhaps drawing on the statements of the founders of their denomination, and other theologians. We are continually accused of purposefully spreading disinformation, and/or being ignorant and lacking in truth. We try to explain that we are simply using a different definition than they are use to. However, we are rarely successful.
Reference used:
Copyright © 2000 to 2007 by Ontario Consultants on Religious
Tolerance
|
|