"In none of these various testimonies to the fact of Christ is there
any slightest hint or idea that he was not a real historical person." Roderic
Dunkerley, "Beyond the Gospels."
"Historically, it is quite doubtful whether Christ ever existed at all, and if
He did we do not know anything about Him." Bertrand Russell,
"Why I am not a Christian."
Jesus' existence: the full range of views:
Almost everyone believes that Jesus walked the land of Palestine in the 1st
century CE. Many have never considered the alternative - that Jesus was a mythical being.
Most Christians would probably consider such an idea to be blasphemy:
A conservative Christian, who believes in the inerrancy
(freedom from error) of the Bible, and the
inspiration by God of its authors, might cite passages from the Bible as proof of his
existence. The gospels link Jesus' birth and crucifixion to historical
persons and events. They describe his sayings, conversations, prayers
and actions in great detail.
Many liberal Christians view Jesus as a great Jewish prophet and innovative, itinerant
teacher. Even though they do not necessarily consider him divine, few ever question his
existence.
Muslims also believe that Jesus was a great prophet. They do not believe that he died on
the cross, but they definitely accept that he was born of a virgin, lived in Palestine
in the early 1st century CE, and ascended to heaven without
having previously died.
Many Jewish theologians regard Jesus as an itinerant rabbi of the 1st
century CE who popularized many of the beliefs of the Pharisees and of
the liberal Jewish thought at the time.
However, there are some individuals who disagree that the biblical accounts
of Jesus are accurate:
Some claim that Jesus is simply a mythical
character, not a historical person.
Others claim that stories about a number of Jewish prophets
and teachers from that era were consolidated and attributed to one man: Jesus.
Still others believe that the myths and legends associated with
other religious leaders and founders were collected from Egypt, Persia,
India, etc. They were rewritten to refer to a person in first century CE
Palestine, who may or may not have existed.
Sponsored link:
Philosophers and others who have been skeptical of Jesus' existence:
The vast majority of historians and theologians have always believed in the reality of
Jesus' life. The skeptical view ..."has always been held by a small minority of
investigators, usually 'outsiders'." (i.e. non-theologians). 1It was a group of French philosophers during the French Revolution in the late 18th
century who first suggested that Jesus was a mythical character. 1Bruno
Bauer, a mid-19th century German theologian agreed. In part of his 4 volume set
"Critique of the Gospels and History of Their Origin," he claimed that
Jesus did not exist. 18A subsequent next major skeptic was the English
theologian John M. Robertson who wrote two books in the very early 20th
century. 12, 20More recent books on this topic date from 1957
to 1991 and were written by perhaps a half dozen authors. 21
G.A. Wells, a former professor of German at the University of London was one of
the most prominent. He wrote a series of five books on this topic, arguing that Paul and
other 1st century Christian leaders believed that Jesus had lived in their
distant past, perhaps in the 2nd or 3rd century
BCE.
Michael Martin discussed Jesus' existence in his 1991 book: "The case against Christianity," 18He is a professor of philosophy from Boston University who examined the major
beliefs of Christianity. He concluded that there was insufficient evidence to conclude
that Jesus existed. Earl Doherty, writing in the Humanist in Canada magazine
1 believes that early Christian leaders saw Jesus as the Son
of God who was a spiritual, not human being. He writes: "If Jesus was a 'social
reformer' whose teachings began the Christian movement, as today's liberal scholars now
style him, how can such a Jesus be utterly lacking in all the New Testament epistles,
while only a cosmic Christ is to be found?" He wrote a book: "The
Jesus Puzzle. Did Christianity Begin with a Mythical Christ?" 22 If Doherty's assessment is true,
then Christianity would have many points of similarity to other contemporary religions in
the Roman Empire - particularly Mithraism who also viewed their founder Mithra as
spiritual rather than as an actual historical human being.
Indicators of Jesus' existence or non-existence:
Documents written during his lifetime which mention Jesus: There are
none that date from the period 7 BCE to 33
CE.
The Gospel of Q: This is believed by many theologians to be a
collection of sayings, "which included moral teachings, prophetic admonitions and
controversy stories, plus a few miracles and anecdotes." 1
These had been transmitted orally and are generally believed to have been first written
down by his followers circa 50 CE. Unfortunately, the gospel does not include any dates
for Jesus' life. If Jesus had been executed circa 30 CE, then many who saw and heard him
preach would still have been alive and could have verified that the gospel was accurate.
But a case can be made that the gospel was assembled out of sayings from the 1st or
2nd century BCE.
Epistles from the Christian Scriptures (New Testament):
Liberal theologians believe that some of these were written as late as 150 CE, up to 4
generations after Jesus' death, by authors who were not eye witnesses of his ministry.
Those writers could have based their letters on traditional sayings attributed to Jesus
which dated from an earlier era. An analysis by G.A. Wells showed to his satisfaction that
the authors definitely believed in the existence of Jesus, but did not cite any evidence
that he lived in the 1st century. 17 They
were vague about the location, timing and nature of his birth. Paul does not describe
Jesus as a miracle worker, healer or teacher. Paul blames Jesus' death on Satan and
demons, rather than the Roman government. (2 Timothy does blame Pilate
and "the Jews" for his death. It
thus ties the execution of Jesus to a person known to be alive in
the 1st century CE. However, this epistles was written long after
Paul's death, and may have picked up the concept from the synoptic gospels which had been
widely circulated by that time.)
Conservative Christians believe that all of the books which state that they were written
by Paul were actually authored by him prior to his death in the mid 60's CE. Although
there is no evidence that he was an eye witness to Jesus' ministry, Paul wrote that he
received personal revelations directly from Jesus, presumably in the form of visions. Paul
mentioned that a fellow Christian, James, the brother of Jesus, headed up the Jerusalem
Church. That would be a strong indicator that Jesus had lived in the early 1st
century CE.
The canonical Gospels:
Liberal and mainline theologians generally believe that Mark was the first gospel
written, and that it was composed about 70 CE. Matthew and Luke were authored up to 15
years later. John was written after Luke. None of the authors identities are known. If
these dates are correct, then it is unlikely that any of the authors were eyewitnesses to
Jesus' ministry. In spite of their claims, they were relying on secondary or tertiary
sources, and accumulated church tradition.
Conservative theologians date the gospels much earlier. The Scofield Bible asserts that
Matthew was written by a tax collector by that name who was mentioned in Matthew 10:13.
Dr. Scofield accepted what he referred to as the traditional date of 37 CE. If the
authorship and date are correct, then the gospel represents convincing support that the
author was a disciple of Jesus and an eyewitness to his 1st century CE
ministry.
The Christian Scriptures (New Testament) overall:
Many liberal theologians view the Christian Scriptures as being
composed of some accurate material said and done by Jesus, mixed
in with a many descriptions of Jesus' sayings and acts that never
happened. The latter came from a variety of sources:
Religious propaganda directed at enemies of the author's
religious group. (Anti-Judaic passages in John which imply
that "The Jews" are responsible for Jesus' execution
is one example.)
Events that never happened, but were added to satisfy
prophecy from the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament). (The
identification of Bethlehem as the birth place of Jesus is one
example.)
Other acts and sayings that were either distorted versions
of Jesus life, or which were created out of nothing. These
were added in order to bolster the traditions that had arisen
within the author's faith group. (Jesus instructing his
apostles to baptize in the name of the Trinity is one
example.)
Material copied from other religions in the Mediterranean
area in order to make Jesus' claim to be the God-man. (e.g.
the virgin birth, resurrection, status of Jesus as savior are
some examples.)
Stories of miracles that never happened but were added to
bolster the importance of Jesus. (e.g. raising the dead, or
healing people of leprosy, blindness, hemorrhaging, indwelling
demonic spirits, etc. are some examples).
Probably some other components that the author has missed.
Some liberal theologians might believe that there is little or
no accurate information about Jesus that has survived to the
present time. As Bertrand Russell wrote in "Why I am not a Christian.":
"Historically, it is quite doubtful whether Christ ever existed at all, and if
He did we do not know anything about Him."
The Gnostics: The early Christian movement was composed of Gnostic
Christians,
Jewish Christians, and Pauline Christians. Gnostics in particular maintained that God could never take human
form. Some denied Jesus' existence as a historical person.
Flavius Josephus: He was a Jewish historian who was born in 37 CE. In
his book, Antiquities of the Jews, he described Jesus' as a wise man who was
crucified by Pilate.
Most historians believe that the paragraph in which he describes Jesus is partly or
completely a forgery that was inserted into the text by an unknown Christian. The passage
"appears out of context, thereby breaking the flow of the narrative." 18
Josh McDowell, Don Stewart and other conservative Christians accept the
entire passage as
legitimate. 8
There exists no consensus on a second passage in Antiquities which refers to
Jesus' brother James, having being tried and stoned to death. Some consider it legitimate;
others assess it to be a forgery.
Cornelius Tacitus: He was a Roman historian who lived from 55 to 120 CE
and wrote a book Annals, circa 112 CE. McDowell and Stewart accept his
writings as a strong indicator of Jesus' existence in the early 1st century CE.8
However, the information could have been derived from Christian material circulating
in the early 2nd century.
Suetonius: He was the author of The Lives of the Caesars circa
120 CE. He wrote to "Since the Jews constantly made disturbances at the
instigation of Chrestus, [Emperor Claudius in 49 CE] expelled them from Rome."
This passage is often used to support the historicity of Jesus, assuming that Jesus' title
was misspelled. But Chrestus was in fact a common Greek name. It is likely that
the reference is to a Jewish agitator in Rome by that name.
Other ancient Roman historians: There were about 40 historians who
wrote during the first two centuries. 5 With the exception of
the above, none stated that Jesus existed in the 1st century.
Jewish literature: The Talmud states that Jesus lived in the 2nd
century BCE. However, this passage itself dates from the early 2nd century CE. The authors were
probably basing their writings on a reaction to some of the dozens of Christian gospels
circulating by that time.
Pope Leo X (1513-1521): Some
believe that he considered Jesus to be a mere legend.
Barbara Walker in her Woman's Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets, Page 471,
quotes him as as having said "What
profit has not that fable of Christ brought us!"
Rev. Taylor, in The Diegesis, Page 35, has a slightly different quote
"It was
well known how profitable this fable of Christ has been to us."
The Catholic Encyclopedia refers to a widely circulated
remark: "How much we and our family have profited by the legend
of Christ, is sufficiently evident to all ages."
The first two quotes appear fictional, and unrelated to any actual statement
by Pope Leo X. They have the flavor of folktales. One reason is than
they have appeared in so many different wordings. Their origin appears
to be in a fictional work by John Bale. The Catholic Encyclopedia
refers to him as an: "...apostate English Carmelite, the first to
give currency to these words in the time of Queen Elizabeth" (1533 -
1603). 23 Even if Leo X said
something like one of these "quotes" the meaning is not clear. He may
have been referring to legends and fables arising about the life of
Jesus which accumulated after his death.
Present-day theologians: The assertion that Jesus is not a historical
figure or that he did not live in the early 1st century CE is held by a small number of
academics.
In interests of full disclosure....:
The personal hunch of B.A. Robinson, this website's main author, is that
there were many Jewish teachers wandering in Galilee during the interval 20 to
30 CE. At least one may have been called Yeshua (Hebrew for
Joshua). One developed a devoted following of fellow Jews, committed aggravated
assault in the Jerusalem temple, and was arrested by the occupying Roman Army.
He was crucified as an insurrectionist as one of
perhaps ten thousand other Jews who suffered the same fate during the first
century CE.
The beliefs of two or three of these Galilean teachers were subsequently
amalgamated and recorded in the early gospels that explained the life of a
single individual: Yeshua of Nazareth as a single individual:
One was an itinerant Greek cynic philosopher who lived a life of poverty
and challenged the public on philosophic, ethical and religious matters. The
closest example to a cynic philosopher today would be a combination of
stand-up comic and political cartoonist.
A second was a apocalyptic teacher who preached about the imminent end
of the world in his immediate future -- much like John the Baptizer.
There might even have been a third teacher who was a follower of Hillel.
The latter was a 1st century CE Jewish liberal theologian and one-time
president of the Sanhedrin.
There is`some evidence of this merger. The Gospel of Q,
appears to be the oldest surviving gospel. It was written in sections over time.
The first section describes the sayings of a Greek cynic philosopher; the second
section describes sayings of an apocalyptic teacher. Meanwhile, many of Yeshua's
teachings, as found in the synoptic Gospels, closely match those of Hillel
except on matters of divorce where Hillel was more liberal. Between 30 CE and
100 CE, when the Gospel of Q, the three synoptic canonic Gospels, and the Gospel
of Thomas were first written, the teachings of these multiple teachers were
merged and attributed to a single individual: Yeshua of Nazareth. The rest is
history.
I stress that these are my personal hunches. They are shared by few if any
theologians.
Possible source of material about Jesus' life:
Robert M Price 4 writes:
"In broad outline and in
detail, the life of Jesus as portrayed in the gospels corresponds to the worldwide Mythic
Hero Archetype in which a divine hero's birth is supernaturally predicted and conceived,
the infant hero escapes attempts to kill him, demonstrates his precocious wisdom already
as a child, receives a divine commission, defeats demons, wins acclaim, is hailed as king,
then betrayed, losing popular favor, executed, often on a hilltop, and is vindicated and
taken up to heaven."
He asserts that there are a number of historical and
mythical figures whose life stories contain these elements, including Jesus. But just as
we do not regard Hercules as a historical figure, a case can be made that Jesus was also a
mythical character.
Some theologians and historians believe that many of the details of Jesus' life were
"borrowed" from a competing, contemporary religion, Mithraism.
Mithra was a fictional character who was worshipped as a Good Shepherd, the
Way, the Truth and the Light, the Redeemer, the Savior, and the Messiah. A
religion in his name was founded in the 6th century BCE. 5Mithraism
one of the most popular of religions in the Roman Empire, particularly among its soldiers
and civil servants. It was Christianity's leading rival. 19 Mithra was
also believed to have been born of a virgin. Like Jesus, their births were
celebrated yearly on DEC-25. Mithra was also visited by
shepherds and by Magi. He traveled through the countryside, taught, and performed miracles
with his 12 disciples. He cast out devils, returned sight to
the blind, healed the lame, etc. Symbols associated with Mithra were a Lion and a Lamb. He
held a last supper, was killed, buried in a rock tomb. He rose again after three days
later, at the time of the spring equinox, circa MAR-21. He later ascended into heaven.
Mithraism celebrated the anniversary of his resurrection, similar to the Christian Easter.
They held services on Sunday. Rituals included a Eucharist and six other sacraments that
corresponded to the rituals of the Catholic church. Some individuals who are skeptical about stories
of Jesus' life suspect that Christianity may have appropriated many details of Mithraism
in order to make their religion more acceptable to Pagans. St. Augustine even stated that
the priests of Mithra worshipped the same God as he did. 19Other
early Christians believed that Satan invented Mithraism and that he made Mithra's life and
the practices of the religion identical to what Christianity would become centuries later.
They felt that Satan's purpose was to confuse believers.
References used:
The first draft of this essay was written in 1998 using the books and web
sites listed below. Unfortunately, most of the latter are no longer online.
Earl Doherty, "The Jesus Puzzle: Was there no historical Jesus?"
Journal of Higher Criticism at:
http://pages.ca.inter.net/