Various Christian groups -- conservative Protestants, liberal Protestants
and Roman Catholics have reached different beliefs about when, if ever, the Bible
permits divorce and remarriage.
Each of the authors and webmasters who has written on these topics
appear to believe that their belief alone is the correct interpretation of
the Bible.
The main positions are:
Neither
divorce nor remarriage are allowed. (Conservative Protestant view)
Divorce is OK, but not remarriage. (Ditto)
Divorce is OK in cases of adultery or desertion; remarriage is OK.
(Ditto)
Divorce is OK for many reasons; remarriage is OK. (Ditto)
Divorce is impossible unless the marriage can be proven to have never existed --
described below. (Roman
Catholic)
Divorce is OK in cases of marriage breakdown; remarriage is OK. Religious
liberal and secular view.
This essay describes the fifth position: the Roman Catholic believes that the Bible
does not allow
divorce on any grounds. Valid marriages are indissoluble. However, if it can be proven that a valid marriage had never taken place,
then an annulment is obtained. Remarriage is often allowed after an annulment.
Overview:
The position of the Roman Catholic church on divorce and
remarriage can be summed up in a few sentences:
Divorce was allowed in Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) times.
But the permanence of marriage was restored by Jesus in the first century CE.
Marriage is a sacrament that is indissoluble. Once a valid marriage
has been consummated, It endures until
one spouse dies.
The church does not issue divorces or recognize divorces issued
by other institutions.
The church can issue an annulment. However, the couple must first
prove to a church tribunal that the marriage was invalid.
Sponsored link:
Key passages from the Hebrew Scriptures:
The Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) generally allowed divorce, with a
few notable exceptions. The following passages discussed to divorce and remarriage:
Deuteronomy 22:13-19 Divorce prohibited if the a husband accuses
the
wife of not being a virgin: "If any man take a wife, and go in
unto her, and hate her, And give occasions of speech against her, and
bring up an evil name upon her, and say, I took this woman, and when I
came to her, I found her not a maid: Then shall the father of the damsel,
and her mother, take and bring forth the tokens of the damsel's virginity
unto the elders of the city in the gate: And the damsel's father shall say
unto the elders, I gave my daughter unto this man to wife, and he hateth
her; And, lo, he hath given occasions of speech against her, saying, I
found not thy daughter a maid; and yet these are the tokens of my
daughter's virginity. And they shall spread the cloth before the elders of
the city. And the elders of that city shall take that man and chastise
him; And they shall amerce him in an hundred shekels of silver, and give
them unto the father of the damsel, because he hath brought up an evil
name upon a virgin of Israel: and she shall be his wife; he may not put
her away all his days." If a man accuses his wife of not being a
virgin when she married him, and she is able to prove that she was a
virgin, then he had to pay her father 100 shekels of silver, and was
prohibited from ever divorcing her. The passage continues, by saying that if
she cannot prove her virginity, that she was stoned to death.
Interestingly enough, this passage allows a husband to arrange the murder
of his wife in certain circumstances, and thus obtain a divorce through
her death.
Deuteronomy 22:28-29 Divorce not allowed for seducers of virgins: "If a man find a damsel that is a
virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and
they be found; Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's
father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath
humbled her, he may not put her away all his days." A man who engages
in sexual intercourse with an unmarried virgin, and subsequently marries her, would
never be
permitted to divorce her.
Deuteronomy 24:1-2 Permission to divorce, but only for ancient
times: "When a man hath taken a wife, and
married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes,
because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a
bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his
house. And when she is departed out of his house, she may go and be
another man's wife." This passage allowed a man to divorce his wife
(or wives). However, it did not allow a woman to divorce her husband.
It is unclear what the term "uncleanness" means. Presumably it does not
mean that she had committed adultery, because then she would have been
executed by stoning.
The passage does not approve of divorce. It merely accepts it as a
practice that had been imported by the ancient Hebrews from adjacent Pagan
cultures, where it was a universal custom. Author J. Carl Laney speculates
that if God had generally prohibited divorce, that the ancient Hebrews
would not have honored the law. So, God "chose to progressively reveal his
displeasure with divorce and direct his people back to his standard." 1,2
Deuteronomy 24:3-4 Divorced & remarried woman cannot remarry her
first husband: "And if the latter husband hate her, and
write her a bill of divorcement, and giveth it in her hand, and sendeth
her out of his house; or if the latter husband die, which took her to be
his wife; Her former husband, which sent her away, may not take her again
to be his wife, after that she is defiled; for that is abomination before
the LORD: and thou shalt not cause the land to sin, which the LORD thy God
giveth thee for an inheritance." This covers a case where a woman was divorced by her
husband, remarries, and is subsequently
either divorced again or widowed. She may not remarry her first husband. To
do so
was viewed as a gross sin that violated the land itself.
Ezra 9:1-2: Religious intolerance -- requiring couples in
mixed-marriages to separate: "...The people of Israel, and the
priests, and the Levites, have not separated themselves from the people of
the lands, doing according to their abominations, even of the Canaanites,
the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Jebusites, the Ammonites, the Moabites,
the Egyptians, and the Amorites.
2 For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their
sons: so that the holy seed have mingled themselves with the people of
those lands: yea, the hand of the princes and rulers hath been chief in
this trespass." Ezra was a scribe who had led a small group of Jews
from exile in Babylon back to Jerusalem. He found that many Jews had
entered into inter-faith marriages with women from nearby Pagan countries.
He felt that the Jews would quickly lose their national identity and start
to worship other Gods. The Mosaic Law prohibited such marriages. He decided that
those Hebrews must "put away" their wives. The Hebrew text in this place
uses the word "yasa" (to cause to go out) rather than the normal term "salah
(to send away, to dismiss, to divorce). Similarly, in Ezra 10:11, he uses
the word "badal" (to separate oneself from). It is probable that the
scribe was recommending marital separation, not divorce. The end result is
not clear. The separated individuals may have gone on to marry other
spouses. Alternatively, they may have allowed their wives time to abandon the
religion of their family of origin, adopt Judaism, and be reunited with
their estranged husbands. Deuteronomy 21:10-14 allows such a practice for
the case of foreign women who have been kidnapped and confined in captivity as a
result of war.
Malachi 2:10: Religious intolerance -- requiring couples in
mixed-marriages to separate: "Judah hath dealt treacherously, and
an abomination is committed in Israel and in Jerusalem; for Judah hath
profaned the holiness of the LORD which he loved, and hath married the
daughter of a strange god." Malachi is faced with the same problem as
Ezra, described above. Jewish males were marrying foreign women who
followed different religions. "Daughter of a strange god" refers to
a foreign woman who worshiped a Pagan deity or deities in place of Yahweh.
In Verse 12, he predicted that God would "cut off" (that is,
murder) any man who remained in a mixed marriage. Again, these marriages
may have been considered illicit. Also, the husbands may have simply
separated from their wives, and not divorced them.
Malachi 2:14: Divorce is treacherous behavior: "... the LORD hath been witness between thee
and the wife of thy youth, against whom thou hast dealt treacherously: yet
is she thy companion, and the wife of thy covenant." Malachi is
condemning Hebrew men for abandoning their wives after many years of
marriage and marrying a different woman. Here, marriage is
referred to as a covenant between God, the husband and wife. One property
of a covenant is that it is permanent. The contract between God and the
ancient Hebrews at Sinai is one example of a covenant. See Numbers 30:2,
Ecclesiastes 5:4-6, and Psalm 15:4.
Malachi 2:16: God hates divorce: "For the LORD, the God of
Israel, saith that he hateth putting away..." God hates a man "putting
away" his wife. The Hebrew word in this passage is "salah," a
word that often refers to divorce.
Key passages from the Christian Scriptures:
Although God hates divorce (Malachi 2:16), he allowed it in ancient times with few restrictions. Jesus restored the prohibition
against divorce that had been in place before the Mosaic Law was delivered.
The Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) includes the following important passages
relating to divorce and remarriage:
Matthew 5:31-32: No divorce, except for fornication: "It
hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a
writing of divorcement. But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away
his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit
adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth
adultery." See Matthew 19:9 below.
Matthew 19:4-9: No divorce allowed: "...Have ye not read, that he which made
them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause
shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and
they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one
flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of
divorcement, and to put her away? He saith unto them, Moses because of the
hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the
beginning it was not so. The Pharisees were challenging Jesus'
beliefs about divorce. They asked him to interpret the passage in Deuteronomy 24:1-2which allowed a husband to divorce his wife if he "found some
uncleanness in her." Here, Jesus states that at the time of
the world's creation, divorce was not allowed. However, God permitted the Hebrews in
Moses' time (and later) to divorce their wives, perhaps because they could
not have accepted a prohibition on divorce at that time.
Jesus restored the prohibition against divorce with the statement:
"What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder."
Matthew 19:9: Separation, allowed, but not divorce: "And
I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for
fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso
marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery. This verse has
raised the question whether "the putting-away of the wife and the
dissolution of the marriage bond were not allowed on account of adultery."
3 If this were an accurate interpretation of Verse 9,
(or of Matthew 5:31-32)then these passages would be in
contradiction with other statements by Paul, and by the authors of Mark
and Luke. The consensus of Catholic theologians is that such an analysis
would violate "the infallibility of the Apostolic teaching and the
inerrancy of Sacred Scripture." 3 Thus, an
alternative
interpretation is required. The consensus is that this verse is referring to
a marital separation, not a divorce. That is, the marriage bond remains in
place. Although the husband and wife live separately, they are not free to
remarry.
Mark 10:2-12: No divorce allowed: "And the
Pharisees came to him, and asked him, Is it lawful for a man to put away
his wife? tempting him. And he answered and said unto them, What did Moses
command you? And they said, Moses suffered to write a bill of divorcement,
and to put her away. And Jesus answered and said unto them, For the
hardness of your heart he wrote you this precept. But from the beginning
of the creation God made them male and female. For this cause shall a man
leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; And they twain shall
be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh. What
therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. And in the
house his disciples asked him again of the same matter. And he saith unto
them, Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth
adultery against her. And if a woman shall put away her husband, and be
married to another, she committeth adultery." This passage refers
to the same incident as was described in Matthew 19. Jesus states that divorce is not permitted under any
circumstances. In this passage, Jesus also condemns remarriage.
Luke 16:18: No divorce, on any grounds: "Whosoever putteth
away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever
marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery."
This appears to be a third version of the same incident with the
Pharisees. Here, Jesus does not specifically condemn marital separation or divorce. But he forbids remarriage.
1 Corinthians 7:10-12: No divorce, on any grounds: "And unto
the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart
from her husband: But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried, or be
reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife.
Paul wrote this passage in response to questions raised by the church at
Corinth about divorce and remarriage. He says that God does not allow
divorce. If a couple divorces against the will of God, then their only
options are to remain single, or to reconcile and restore their marriage.
1 Corinthians 7:10-15: "But to the rest speak I, not the
Lord: If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to
dwell with him, let him not put her away. And the woman which hath an
husband that believeth not, and if he be pleased to dwell with her, let
her not leave him. For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife,
and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband: else were your
children unclean; but now are they holy. But if the unbelieving depart,
let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases:
but God hath called us to peace." This is a continuation of the above
passage. It covers the situation where a believer is married to a
non-Christian, and the non-Christian insists on a divorce. Some
theologians interpret this as Paul exercising his "pastoral privilege"
by changing the teachings of Jesus to allow divorce in this one case.
However, it is unlikely that this is his intent because it would negate
what Paul has just written in verses 10 to 12. It is more likely that Paul
means that if the unbelieving spouse demands a divorce, that the Christian
is not required to resort to legal means to preserve the marriage; he or
she is to leave the unbeliever at peace, by not contesting the divorce.
However, he is not free to remarry, since the original marriage is still
binding.
Roman Catholic Divorce Issues, at:
http://www.divorceinfo.com/catholic.htm This essay includes many
links to essays on divorce, annulment and remarriage in the Catholic church on
other web sites.