"Hot" religious topics
All viewpoints on the death penalty.
Execution methods, ancient and modern
Cross, rifle, hangman's noose, electric chair, and lethal injection table.
The end result for each method is the same for all victims.
About this section:
This section of our website deals with the
execution of criminals found guilty of having committed very serious crimes.
used to be a universal practice in the world. However, in recent decades, almost all democracies in the world have abandoned
the death penalty. The U.S., Japan, and South Korea are the only exceptions. Of course, many dictatorships and theocracies in the world retain the death penalty as a terror weapon against their own people. Some countries execute people because they are Atheists, gay, or even abandon the state religion in favor of another faith or no organized religion at all.
In North America, as of 2015-MAY-29:
- 19 states in the U.S. and the country of Canada have abolished the death penalty.
- During 2015, the Legislature in Nebraska has voted to abolish the death penalty. Governor Pet Ricketts (R) has vetoed the bill. However, the Legislature overode the veto by a vote of 30 to 19. 30 votes was the minimum required to successfully override a veto. Surprisingly, there was considerable support from conservative lawgivers who objected to the expensive and bureaucratic process needed to execute people, and who felt that ending people's lives is not a proper function of government. Some legislators may have extended their pro-life beliefs concerning abortion access to also reject the concept of the state killing people.
- Previous to Nebraska's ban, Connecticut and Maryland were the most recent states to eliminate executions. Maryland is the only state south of the Mason-Dixon line to have done so. However, Connecticut's law only relates to people who commit very serious crimes in the future. There are still 11 inmates who were convicted of serious crimes in the past, are on death row, and who may be executed in the future.
- Californian adults voted in Proposition 34 -- a citizen initiative -- on election day in early 2012-NOV. Voters were able to choose between two options: to preserve capital punishment or to replace it with life imprisonment without any possibility of parole. The final vote was 52.8% in favor of the more expensive option -- retaining the death penalty -- and 47.2% for ending executions. If it had passed, it would have saved the state about $100 million a year.
Like other topics
elsewhere in this website, we try to explain objectively all viewpoints. Thus,
no matter what your beliefs are, you will certainly see material with which you
strongly disagree and other material with which you will agree. If you don't want to see your beilefs challenged you might want to leave this web site, and stick with other information sources that are biased either in a liberal or conservative direction and which matche your own views.
Topics covered in this section are:
- Facts about the death penalty:
- Status and developments of the death penalty in the
- Widening the range of the death penalty beyond murder:
- Arguments for and against the death penalty:
- Religious factors:
- What the Bible says about the death penalty
- Policies by various religious groups:
- Alternatives to the death penalty; church statements; polling data:
- Extraditing accused murderers to the U.S.
- Current news items: Links
on the death penalty to IPS news and the Death Penalty Information Center.
- Past developments:
- 1997, 1998, 1999,
- 2000, 2001, 2002,
- 2003, 2004, 2005,
- 2006, 2007, 2008,
- 2009 to early 2012 Late 2012 to the end of 2013
- 2015 in the U.S. and rest of the world: Part 1 Part 2 Part 3
- 2016: Part 1 Part 2
- Death penalty websites, essays, and books, promoting different viewpoints
You can safely buy the following books from Amazon.com's online bookstore
If you see a generic Amazon display below, please click on your browser's
An innovative T-shirt:
As of 2015-MAY, Amnesty International sells a remarkable unisex T-shirt that shows the U.S. states that still have the death penalty as red stars and those that don't as white stars. The star representing Texas appears to have trailing blood smear, apparently because of the enormous number of executions per capita in that state. The caption says "Abolish the Death Penalty." Amnesty International is working to ensure that more red stars will flip to white. They enclose a stencil with some fabric paint so that you can change red stars to white as additional states abolish capital punishment. See: http://shop.amnestyusa.org/ Amazon.com offers free shipping for Amazon Prime members.
Because this shirt will likely be a conversation-starter, AI has supplied three arguments against the death penalty:
- Two wrongs don't make a right.
- The death penalty system is too flawed to be fixed, and risks innocent lives.
- There are more constructive ways to address violent crime!
To which we would like to add: (Bias alert)
- It is more expensive to execute someone than to keep them in jail for life.
- If asked, most Americans will say that they favor life sentences without any possibility of parole, instead of execution.
- Whether you are executed or not depends greatly on how much money you have to spend in your defense, and your skin color.
- Stopping the death penalty:
- Is a pro-life position.
- Is aligned with the Golden Rule, which is for people to do onto others as they would wish others to do onto them in return. Christ commanded that his followers obey the Golden Rule.
- Keeps more prison guards employed.
- Helps create a culture in which human personhood is so highly valued that not even the state is allowed to kill people.
One great thing about this T-shirt is that you can proudly wear it if you are a supporter of the death penalty. All you have to do is to erase the word "Abolish."
Other T-shirts, both for and against the death penalty are available on the Cafe Press web site at: http://www.cafepress.com/ They also sell bumper stickers, cups, wall clocks, tote bags, hats, mugs, and buttons
Copyright © 1995 to 2016 by Ontario Consultants on
Originally published: 1995-JUN-8
Last updated 2016-NOV-17
Author: Bruce A Robinson