A discussion of academic freedom
with respect to intelligent design
Sponsored link.
Quotations:
Katherine T. Phan: "In Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, Stein –
who has also worked as a lawyer, an economist, an author and social
commentator – embarks on a journey across the globe to answer the long
disputed question 'Were we designed or are we simply the end result of an
ancient mud puddle struck by lightning'?"
1
Ben Stein: "EXPELLED:
No Intelligence Allowed is a controversial, soon-to-be-released
documentary that chronicles my confrontation with the widespread suppression
and entrenched discrimination that is spreading in our institutions,
laboratories and most importantly, in our classrooms, and that is doing
irreparable harm to some of the world’s top scientists, educators, and
thinkers." 2
Roy Speckhardt: "If one needs to
believe in a god to be moral, why are we seeing yet another case of
dishonesty by the devout? Why were leading scientists deceived as to the
intentions of a religious group of filmmakers? It’s immaterial that nobody
may have asked about the film’s premise. It was the duty of the filmmakers
to provide it, unasked. We godless humanists know
this; why didn’t the filmmakers? Moreover, the very scientists whom
creationists decry don’t make films under such false pretenses."
3 (Speckhardtis the executive director of the American
Humanist Association.)
The plot:
Ben Stein is well known for his role in the movie "Ferris Bueller's Day
Off," his TV program "Win Ben Stein's Money," and many other
projects. According to the New York Times:
"He said he also believed the theory of evolution leads to racism and
ultimately genocide, an idea common among
creationist thinkers. If it were up to him, he
said, the film would be called 'From Darwin to Hitler'.'' 4
He traveled the world interviewing top scientists, educators and
philosophers concerning what he feels is a lack of intellectual freedom
concerning beliefs about origins of the species. He believes that:
"... educators and
scientists are being ridiculed, denied tenure and even fired - for the 'crime'
of merely believing that their might be evidence of 'design' in nature, and that
perhaps life is not just the result of accidental, random chance." 4
That is, they
are not allowed to promote Intelligent Design as a alternative to the Theory of
Evolution.
The New York Times states:
"The film is described in its online trailer as 'a startling revelation
that freedom of thought and freedom of inquiry have been expelled from
publicly-funded high schools, universities and research institutions.'
According to its Web site, the film asserts that people in academia who see
evidence of a supernatural intelligence in biological processes have
unfairly lost their jobs, been denied tenure or suffered other penalties as
part of a scientific conspiracy to keep God out of the nation's laboratories
and classrooms." 4
The movie is opening during 2008-APR in select
theatres across the U.S.
Allegations of deception:
According to the New York Times, Rampart Films invited the
evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins and other leading scientists to be
interviewed for their documentary film to be called "Crossroads." The movie was
to examine the intersection of science and religion. After the interviews, the
scientists found themselves in another movie (Expelled: No intelligence
allowed) by a different producer (Premise Media).
Dawkins said:
"At no time was I given the slightest clue that these people were a
creationist front."
Eugenie C. Scott, head of the National Center for Science Education
said:
''I have certainly been taped by people and appeared in productions where
people's views are different than mine, and that's fine...'I just expect
people to be honest with me, and they weren't.'' 4
The New York Times states:
"Mr. Stein, a freelance columnist who writes Everybody's Business
for The New York Times, conducts the film's on-camera interviews. The
interviews were lined up for him by others, and he denied misleading anyone.
'I don't remember a single person asking me what the movie was about,' he
said in a telephone interview."
"Walt Ruloff, a producer and partner in Premise Media, also denied that
there was any deception. Mr. Ruloff said in a telephone interview that
Rampant Films was a Premise subsidiary, and that the movie's
title was changed on the advice of marketing experts, something he said was
routine in filmmaking." 4