Twitter icon


Facebook icon

ABOUT THIS SITE
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
Christian def'n
Climate Change
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret the Bible
 Persons
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
 Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment/climate

Same-sex marriage

Homosexuality
Human rights
Gays in the military
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

 

 

Religious Tolerance logo

An essay donated by Gabriel Gherasim

The Final Solution, or Am I worth living?

Cover of Time Magazine, 2012-JUN-11

Cover of Time Magazine, 2012-JUN-11

horizontal rule

A video from 2017 has been put in circulation by the Dutch society, in which an individual with Down syndrome is being lectured on how much he costs society: "You cost ten times more than a regular individual, up there with people in nursing homes." Furthermore, the individual with the Down syndrome is being treated with sarcasm: "You are a very valuable individual, aren’t you?" This recrimination is done with the implicit goal of encouraging legislation to terminate such assistance to individuals with Down syndrome: See: https://www.youtube.com/

In a powerful testimony in regards to the same attitudes being circulated by some US Congress members in 2017, a guest speaker with Down syndrome argues against such eugenics techniques, as it may in fact be the beginning of an ever enlarging circle of exclusions for medical care, for individuals with disabilities: See: https://www.youtube.com/

(In less than two months, this video received over a half million views and almost five thousand comments!)

The argument that "selective denial of valid medical care" (valid from the perspective of the doctors treating the patients), could and should never happen in a civilized society is at the crux of this argument. The issues are problematic when insurances and governments decide to refuse (or postpone until it’s too late) medical care, in order to save money.

Articles such as Time’s front cover story: How to Die (2012-JUN-11) and Newsweek front cover story: The Case for Killing Granny (2009-SEP-21), have brought these issues into public discussion already this century.

And Bill Gates openly discusses during 2010-SEP-10 how: "wouldn’t be better not to lay off those 3 teachers and refuse medical treatment to one patient for three months? But that’s called the Death Panel and you are not supposed to have that discussion." See: https://www.youtube.com/

Yes indeed Mr. Gates and why is that?

Whether it be a fetus diagnosed with the Down Syndrome and being aborted against the wish of the mother because of insurance and/or governmental decisions, or grandma who is being denied against her wish by the same culprits, medical treatment which would have prolonged her life for three more months, a person is worth living and it behooves to her to choose herself the extent of using available medical treatment.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link:

horizontal rule

We have not reached 2017-DEC because we applauded and supported to victories Nazi and Communist socialist states, which invariably preached a "final solution" in regards to their citizens with disabilities, whom they saw as "burdens." Quite the opposite.

The amount of the GDP expenditures being juxtaposed to one service versus the other, is a simplistic and inefficient approach to resolving budgetary matters. Instead of focusing to turning to the government to limit and deny medical care, we should make the government accountable of eliminating the endemic fraudulent practices of said insurances, which alone would compensate for any if not all of the expenses sought by individuals for their own care from the person centered approach.

Any efforts to regress to eugenics (or selective breeding and/or the subsequent elimination of the‘unfit’), is going to result in turning us back into a predatory savage society.

How you may have arrived here:

Home> Morality > Health Care here

 Home > Important essays here

Home pageVisitors' essays > here

Home pageWebsite featuresVisitors' essays > here

horizontal rule

Originally posted on: 2017-DEC-22
line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

Go to the previous page, or go to the healthcare menu, or visitors' essays menu, or choose:

 

 

 

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Hot, controversial topics

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?


Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

 
Sponsored links