Twitter icon

Facebook icon

About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD of this site
Vital notes

World religions
Christian def'n
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret the Bible
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Confusing terms
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Death penalty

Same-sex marriage

Human rights
Gays in the military
Sex & gender
Stem cells
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news



Religious Tolerance logo

The religious freedom to discriminate against
transgender persons and many others in North Carolina:

Part 11

2016-DEC to 2017-APR:
Charlotte ordinance repealed.
State law HB2 also repealed.


An unknown transgender woman.
She was identified as a male at birth.

horizontal rule

This topic is continued here from the previous essay

horizontal rule

Sponsored link

horizontal rule

On 2016-DEC-21, Charlotte City Council held another meeting and repealed the entire city ordinance, at least for a while.

However, some Republican state lawmakers defended the HB2 state law and resisted its repeal:

  • State Senator Buck Newton called the city anti-discrimination ordinance a "lunatic ordinance" enacted by "the lunatic Left." 2

  • On DEC-21, Lt. Gov. Dan Forest issued a statement saying:

    "No economic, political or ideological pressure can convince me that what is wrong is right. It will always be wrong for men to have access to women's showers and bathrooms." 2

Webmaster's comment [bias alert]:

It all comes down to how one defines gender: how does one differentiate between males and females?

Dan Forest clearly defines people's gender by their birth-identified gender and not their current gender identity and/or expression. Expressing it in physical terms, Forest defines gender on the basis of a person's genitals, not by the functioning of internal structures in their brain which, among transgender persons, typically have the design of the opposite gender. Thus, he would describe the woman pictured above to be a man. One can imagine the explosive reaction if she walked in a male washroom. Strangely, this type of reaction is rarely mentioned in the conservative political and religious media.

Some Republican lawmakers wrote amendments to the bill that had been written to repeal HB2. The new version would forbid cities from enacting or amending an ordinance that regulated access to public showers or restrooms for an interval of six months. The agreement collapsed at this point. The state Senate voted to reject the amendments. The state House adjourned without a vote.

Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger said that Governor-elect:

"Roy Cooper and Senate Democrats killed the repeal. Their action (in not agreeing to the amendment) proves they only wanted a repeal in order to force radical social engineering and shared bathrooms across North Carolina, at the expense of our state’s families, our reputation and our economy." 2

By the end of 2016, a major part of the City of Charlotte's ordinance was still in effect. The state law HB 2 was active in its original form. The City of Durham was considering passing an ordinance similar to Charlotte's if HB2 was repealed. 2

Transgender individuals in the "Tar Heel state" had to choose among three unacceptable options:

  • Use the washroom associated with their birth-identified gender and risk starting a disturbance in which they might be assaulted, or

  • Violating state law HB2 and use the washroom that corresponds to their gender identity where she or he would probably blend in without any disturbance, or

  • Search for a nearby single stall or family washroom, which may not exist.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link:

horizontal rule

Week of 2017-MAR-26: HB 2 is suddenly repealed due to pressure from the NCAA:

According to Wikipedia:

"The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) ... regulates athletes of 1,281 institutions, conferences, organizations, and individuals. It also organizes the athletic programs of many colleges and universities in the United States and Canada, and helps more than 450,000 college student-athletes who compete annually in college sports."

Back during 2016-SEP, the NCAA had announced that it was pulling all seven championship events out of North Carolina that had been planned for the 2016-2017 academic year. They objected to state law HB 2 because it discriminates against transgender persons. 3

This week, the NCAA warned that they may decide to continue to relocate planned championship sporting events away from the state through to the year 2022 because the HB 2 law was still in place. One such event is the Division I men's basketball tournament, which generates most of the NCAA revenue; it is distributed back into funds for various organizations and institutions in North Carolina and other states.

Basketball, in particular, is of phenomenal interest to residents in North Carolina. A Google search for <north carolina tar heels men's basketball> returned over 3 million hits!

This NCAA threat apparently broke the legislative logjam. In a flurry of activity, Governor Roy Cooper (D) met with Republican leaders during the early days of the week of 2017-MAR-26, and worked out the wording of a compromise bill, HB 142. It would repeal HB 2 immediately, create a moratorium on local nondiscrimination ordinances in North Carolina cities through to the year 2020, and leave the future regulation of washrooms up to state lawmakers. On the morning of MAR-30, the compromise bill was presented to the Senate and passed 32 to 16. That afternoon, it was presented to Representatives in the House.

It appears that nobody in the House was particularly pleased with the wording of the repeal bill:

  • Richard Vausset, writing for the New York Times, reported that:

    "... Rep. Deb Butler [D], one of the state's few openly gay members of the legislature, said that the compromise would not ameliorate 'the stigma and suffering' associated with HB 2. [She said] 'We would rather suffer HB2 than to have this body, one more time, deny us the full and unfettered protection of the law'." 4

  • Cathryn Oakley, senior legislative counsel for the Human Rights Campaign -- a leading national pro-equality LGBT agency -- said that the compromise bill would leave lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people with no statewide anti-discrimination ordinance and no ability to seek such protection from [their] local government for a number of years. She said:

    "What that means for the LGBT community is that we continue to be boxed out of nondiscrimination protections."

  • The conservative non-profit group "NC Values Coalition" asked their membership to contact their Representatives and Senators and ask them to retain HB 2 intact because then men would continue to not be allowed:

    "... into women's and little girl's bathrooms and showers."

After "fiery denunciations" by both conservative and liberal members of the House, the compromise bill HB 142 was passed 70 to 48.

The governor explained the bill to the public in a video:


horizontal rule

Vermont Mayor Miro Weinberger issues a travel ban to North Carolina for city employees:

Mayor of Burlingon -- Vermont's largest city -- has issued a travel ban that prohibits city employees from traveling to North Carolina on official business. He said:

"North Carolina’s new law does nothing to protect transgender individuals and creates a unique prohibition against municipalities taking any action to reduce discrimination. Burlington will stand with the many other cities from around the country that will continue to boycott North Carolina until the state ends this discriminatory practice." 6

Justin Haskins, writing for The Blaze, explained the current status of washroom usage by transgender persons in Norh Carolina:

"Currently, there are no state laws that grant or forbid transgender people from using the restroom of their choice. This effectively means local businesses could allow or forbid transgender people from using bathrooms not in line with their biological gender. Transgender people who choose to ignore the dictates of a business owner that requires customers to use restrooms based on biological sex could potentially be prosecuted for trespassing." 6

California, Washington State, and Chicago, IL have had travel bans for their employees which will be continuing in force. Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel issued a statement, saying:

"As a welcoming city for all, we are clear on our values of tolerance and inclusion, and we won’t stand by idly when discriminatory policies threaten the rights of any single group or community. Until North Carolina acknowledges the rights of the LGBTQ community and treats all individuals fairly, the City of Chicago will be taking our business elsewhere, and we encourage others to do the same." 6

horizontal rule

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1. Downloaded from the transgender menu of
  2. Fr. Mark Hodges, "North Carolina LGBT activists fail in latest bid to repeal bathroom privacy bill," Life Site News, 2016-DEC-22, at:
  3. "National Collegiate Athletic Association," Wikipedia, as on 2017-APR-08, at:
  4. "North Carolina governor signs law replacing 'bathroom bill'," The Star, print copy, 2017-MAR-30
  5. "North Carolina governor signs law replacing 'bathroom bill'," The Star, 2017-MAR-30, at:
  6. Justin Haskins, "Vermont mayor issues controversial travel ban to ‘protect’ transgender people," Th Blaze, 2017-APR-16, at:

horizontal rule

How you may have arrived here:

Home > Religious freedom > Freedom to Discriminate > North Carolina > here

Home > Important essays > Religious freedom > Freedom to Discriminate> North Carolina > here

Home > Religious information > Religious freedom > Freedom to Discriminate> North Carolina > here

Home > Human rights > Religious freedom > Freedom to Discriminate> North Carolina > here

 Home > Transgender > North Carolina > here

 Home > "Hot" topics > Transgender > North Carolina > here

 Home > Christianity > Christian history, belief... > Beliefs > Transgender > North Carolina > here

Home > Christianity > History, practices... > Christian practices > Transgender > North Carolina > here

Home > Religious Information > Basic data > Transgender > North Carolina > here

Home > Human rights > Transgender > North Carolina > here

Home > Morality and ethics > Transgender > North Carolina > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2016 & 2017by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Original posting: 2016-DEC-23
Latest update : 2017-APR-17.
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

Go to the previous page, or the 2016: Freedom to discriminate laws in North Carolina, or choose:


Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Hot, controversial topics

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

Sponsored links