Dr. Jack Drescher, a medical doctor who works extensively with gays, commented:
"My own clinical experience with gay men
who failed to change in reparative therapy is that they suffered damage to their
self-esteem, experienced resultant anxiety and depression, and often felt a deep
mistrust of mental health professionals. This mistrust and shame may explain why
no good follow-up studies of these individuals exist." 3
A representative of the Honolulu, HI Gay and Lesbian Education and Advocacy
Foundation (at HawaiiGay1@aol.com ) wrote that
over a 25 year period, hundreds of their members had tried reparative therapy groups. He
commented: "I can honestly say, I have never seen one of them claiming they were
cured or felt better until they began to accept their goodness as a Gay person."
Mel White, a prominent Evangelical Christian, unsuccessfully attempted to change
his homosexual orientation over a period of decades. His book describes his experiences. 4
Investigative report of ex-gays: In 1995, reporter Justin Chin joined an ex-gay program which is affiliated
with Exodus Ministries in California. His study was funded by the Fund for
Investigative Journalism and was published in The Progressive. 5He
found that:
"Ex-gays are sexually celibate but homosexuality is still
central to them: Everything in their lives revolves around homosexuality and
avoiding it. Listening to Exodus conference junkies and ex-program members
speak, it is easy to see how this subculture is maintained. Ultimately, the
difference between gays and ex-gays is like the difference between cheese and
cheddar. The ex-gays try to drown their homosexuality in Bible verses, marriage,
family, and their own new subcultural niche, but their homosexuality remains."
The author of this essay attempted to survey each of the 36 websites of the GayChangeWebRing. 6 These are mainly Internet sites
created by individuals or small Christian transformational ministries. From the sites' content,
all appear to be conservative Christian in outlook. Five
returned the dreaded "404" error message meaning that they were no longer online. One was a discontinued site. Two did not publish their Email address. On 2000-MAY-20, we sent a
survey by Email to each of the 28 accessible websites.
The core of the survey letter asked:
"Considering all of the persons who have entered your program and who
have made a sincere effort to change, please estimate what percentage of
individuals fall into each of the following categories:
Entered the program with a homosexual orientation and left with a
heterosexual orientation.
Entered the program with a homosexual orientation and left with a
homosexual orientation, but committed to celibacy.
Entered the program with a homosexual orientation and left with a
homosexual orientation, and open to future gay/lesbian sexual relationships.
Entered the program with a bisexual orientation and left with a
heterosexual orientation.
Entered the program with a bisexual orientation and left with a bisexual
orientation, but committed to pursuing only relationships with the opposite
gender.
Entered the program with a bisexual orientation and left with a bisexual
orientation, but open to gay/lesbian or heterosexual sexual behavior.
Don't know.
Other (please define):
We received 7 replies:
Four stated that they had no results to report. Some of their reasons
were:
They dealt with gays and lesbians only by Email or phone.
They met with clients for only a short time.
They kept no records.
They dealt with clients anonymously.
One group reported three successes over 7 or more years:
Two clients entered therapy with a homosexual orientation, and
left with a homosexual orientation. Both have decided to remain
celibate.
One entered therapy with a bisexual orientation, and left with a
bisexual orientation, has made a commitment to a person of the
opposite sex and is now open to marrying them.
One group refused to reveal their results because they felt that our website is biased.
Our survey produced very little meaningful data. The few results that we were able to extract support
the concept that RT does not change a person's sexual orientation, but can
occasionally change an individual's behavior, largely by choosing celibacy.
Although tens of thousands of individuals are (or have been) involved in
these forms of experimental therapy, very few studies have been made of its safety or
effectiveness. Those that have been made are very seriously flawed.
An meaningful study could be conducted along the following lines:
Tro to organize a research group containing scientists who have no preconceived beliefs
about the nature of sexual orientation. Since this is probably impossible, then the group
should at least include balanced numbers of therapists who hold various opposing views on
the safety and effectiveness of these therapies.
Design a study to:
Determine the sexual orientation of a large number of clients entering reparative therapy.
Document their sexual self-identification, fantasies, feelings of
attraction, past sexual activities, reasons for
seeking conversion, etc.
Study them periodically during the progress of therapy.
Repeat the evaluation as they leave therapy.
Follow them for at least 5 years after therapy. Periodically assess
their sexual orientation by evaluating their sexual
self-identification, fantasies, feelings and behaviors.
Determine how many persons with homosexual orientation before therapy were able to
change their orientation to heterosexual or bisexual during therapy and maintain this for many years
after therapy.
Publish the results in a peer-reviewed journal.
Have the study independently replicated by one or more additional groups.
The cost of such a study would be miniscule when compared to the expense of
blindly continuing reparative therapy at its present level.
This type of study
has never been conducted. The National Association for Research and Therapy of
Homosexuality (NARTH) has called for a review similar to this, to be designed jointly
by themselves and the American Psychological Association. Unfortunately,
the APA refused to cooperate. Such a study has little
chance of being performed in today's religious and social climate.