Quantcast


Twitter icon


Facebook icon

About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD of this site
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
Christian def'n
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret the Bible
 Persons
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
 Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment

Same-sex marriage

Homosexuality
Human rights
Gays in the military
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

Sponsored links

 

 

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

Attempts to declare the Federal "Defense of
marriage act" (DOMA) unconstitutional via the courts

Menu

2009 to now: "Gill et al. v. Office of Personnel
Management et al
." and Massachusetts v.
Department of Health and Human Services
.

Sponsored link.


horizontal rule

In this web site:
"DOMA" means the Defense of Marriage Acts; "SSM" means same-sex marriage;
and "LGBT" means lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender individuals and transsexuals.

horizontal rule

Overview of the two Massachusetts DOMA cases:

  • In 2009: The Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD) -- a national gay-equality group -- initiated a lawsuit attempting to have the federal DOMA act declared unconstitutional. It was filed in Federal District Court in Boston MA and called: "Gill et al. v. Office of Personnel Management et al."

    A second and very similar case case was launched by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, called: Massachusetts v. Department of Health and Human Services. Because of the similarity of the two cases, U.S. District Court Judge Joseph L. Tauro heard and ruled on both cases together.

Lawyer David Boies, who is very active in SSM cases, compared court challenges to the constitutionality of DOMA with the attempts by Democratic legislators to repeal DOMA directly. He called them:

"... two paths to the same point. ... The DOMA litigation has an additional advantage in the sense that historically marriage has always been a state issue. While I think they’re both the same issue, the DOMA [lawsuits approach is] ... in some sense even a stronger case because it has both the equal protection and due process [constitutional] arguments and the states’ rights arguments." 1

  • In 2010: District Court Judge Tauro ruled that the federal DOMA law is clearly unconstitutional. The case was appealed to the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals which upheld the lower court's ruling.

  • In 2012: The case was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

  • On 2012-DEC-07, the Justices of the Supreme Court decided to not accept the Gill appeal. Instead, they have accepted the very similar Windsor v. U.S. case. Amicus Curia briefs were accepted up until 2013-FEB-28. Oral arguments will be heard on 2013-MAR-27. The court's ruling is expected in late 2013-JUN.

horizontal rule

Topics covered in this section:

horizontal line

References used:

The following information source was used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlink is not necessarily still active today.

  1. Julie Bolcer, "Cuomo calls for end of DOMA," Advocate.com, 2011-OCT-28, at: http://www.advocate.com/

horizontal line

Site navigation:

Home > Religious info. > Basic > Marriage > SSM > SSM menu > DOMA > via courts > here

Home > "Hot" topics > Homosexuality > SSM > SSM menu > DOMA > via courts > here

Copyright © 2009 to 2013 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally written: 2009-MAR
Latest update: 2013-MAR-04
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

Go to the previous page, or to the "Challenging DOMA via courts" menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?


Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

 

Sponsored links: