Quantcast


Twitter icon


Facebook icon

About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD of this site
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
Christian def'n
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret the Bible
 Persons
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
 Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment

Same-sex marriage

Homosexuality
Human rights
Gays in the military
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

Sponsored links

 

 

 

 

 

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.


Same-sex marriages (SSM) and LGBT rights In Arizona.

Menu

2003 to 2014-OCT:
The path to same-sex marriage in Arizona.

horizontal rule

Throughout this web site, the acronym "LGBT" refers to
Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals, and Transgender persons.

horizontal rule

Overview: The 11 year path to attaining same-sex marriage in Arizona:

The journey began with a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Lawrence v. Texas. The basic question behind the lawsuit was whether a state could create a law that criminalizes behavior merely because it was considered immoral by much of the public. The Court decided by the narrowest of margins (5 to 4) that it could not.

In 2003, the court issued its ruling. It overturned a law in Texas that criminalized sexual behaviors by adult, consensual, same-sex couples in private that were not criminal if the same activity was performed by adult, consensual, opposite-sex couples in private. This court ruling decriminalized such behaviors by same-sex couples throughout the entire U.S.

As predicted by Justice Antonin Scalia at the time, this decision would pave the way to legalizing same-sex marriage.

During 2003, a gay couple launched a lawsuit at the Arizona Court of Appeals in an attempt to attain marriage equality in the state. They lost.

During early 2014, two separate groups of same-sex couples filed a pair of lawsuits in Arizona's federal District Court: Connolly v. Jeans and Majors v. Horne. They sought permission for same-sex couples to marry in the state, and for Arizona to be forced to recognize same-sex marriages solemnized out-of-state.

On 2014-OCT-07, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals which has jurisdiction over Arizona and eight other states in the U.S. West ruled in favor of marriage equality for Nevada and Idaho. This made the principle of marriage equality binding throughout the Circuit Court's nine states.

Finally, on Friday, 2014-OCT-17, federal District Court Judge John Sedwick released his ruling in the cases Connolly v. Jeans and Majors v. Horne. As with so many other federal and state court decisions, Judge Sedwick affirmed marriage equality. His ruling was based on the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. He did not issue a stay in his ruling. The Attorney General decided to not appeal the court''s decision. Same-sex couples started to marry almost immediately.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.

horizontal rule

Topics contained in this section:

  • Part 1: 2003: The Lawrence v. Texas decision by the U.S. Supreme Court.  2003: The first lawsuit in Arizona fails to achieve marriage equality.

  • Part 2: 2012 to 2014-OCT: Opinion polls. Two lawsuits filed in District Court. Ruling affirms same-sex marriage. Various reactions.

  • Part 3: Part 3: 2014-OCT: More reactions to same-sex marriage. Arizona becomes the 31st state with marriage equality.

horizontal rule
Site navigation:

Home > Religious info. > Basic > Marriage > SSM > SSM menu > here

Home > "Hot" topics > Homosexuality > SSM > SSM menu > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2003 to 2014 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Latest update: 2014-OCT-21
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or return to the Same-sex Marriage menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Hot, controversial topics

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?


Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

 
Sponsored links