Quantcast


Twitter icon


Facebook icon

About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD of this site
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
-Christian definition
 -Shared beliefs
 -Handling change
 -Bible topics
 -Bible inerrancy
 -Bible harmony
 -Interpret the Bible
 -Persons
 -Beliefs & creeds
 -Da Vinci code
 -Revelation, 666
 -Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment

Same-sex marriage

Homosexuality
Human rights
Gays in the military
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

Sponsored links

 

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

Same-sex marriages in Canada

Activities: 2006 July to November

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.

horizontal rule

Earlier developments are described in another essay

In this essay, "SSM" means "same-sex marriage." "MP" means Member of Parliament.

horizontal rule

Status of SSM in Canada:

Same-sex couples in Canada became able to marry anywhere in Canada, except for Prince Edward Island, on 2005-JUL-20 when Bill C-38 was proclaimed. PEI conformed later in the year. The first item that the leader of the Conservative Party discussed during the federal election campaign was his intention to initiate new Parliamentary legislation to ban SSM, while allowing existing same-sex marriages to continue. If the bill becomes law, then future same-sex couples would be offered some sort of civil union arrangement.

horizontal rule

2006-AUG-15: Catholic bishop condemns marriage equality:

Bishop Richard Smith of Pembroke ON delivered a speech to the annual national convention of the Catholic Women's League (CWL) held in Halifax, NS. He said that Parliament made a "terrible mistake" when they allowed same-sex couples to marry. He said that the Prime Minister's promise to reopen the SSM debate represents "a rare second chance" to revisit the issue and perhaps deny same-sex couples the right to marry once more. He urged the CWL members to become politically active on this topic. He believed that he could speak for all of the bishops in Canada when it came to the "incredibly important issue" of restricting marriage to opposite-sex couples.  1

horizontal rule

2006-AUG-21: Anti-gay Christian activists fail to unseat MP:

Charles McVety, president of the Canada Christian College in Toronto, and the Canada Family Action Coalition, and the Defend Marriage Coalition and had promised vowed to try to oust Turner and any other existing MPs who support same-sex marriage. He complained that Garth Turner, MP for Halton riding, had attacked his organizations in his weblog: "...spewing venom against ethnic and religious people, calling us the Taliban, flowers of evil and monochromatic militants." He suggested that Turner's "toxic rhetoric" has made it impossible for any Conservative party candidate to win in the riding.

MvVety attempt fizzled; Turner was acclaimed on AUG-21. Turner said that McVety's challenge was:

"too narrow-focused. They tried to come in with a religious agenda and an anti-gay position. I just don't think most people care that much or that they don't support that position. ... I think Charles McVety made a big tactical error by thinking he could storm into the riding and instantly garner support. People in the riding said, 'We don't need anyone to come in and tell us how to vote. We don't need anyone to tell us to throw our MP out.' I think there was some resentment that McVety was trying to stack the nomination meeting. People don't like that kind of politics." 2

horizontal rule

2006-SEP-08: Letter from the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Halifax:

Most Rev. Archbishop Terrence Predergast issued a pastoral message encouraging members of the Halifax Archdiocese and Yarmouth Diocese in Nova Scotia to contact their MP and ask them to re-open discussion of same-sex marriage. Referring to the 15 months since SSM was authorized in Canada, he said in part:

"....a few months isnít any time at all to measure the impact on society of a major cultural and sociological shift like this, not when marriages are measured in years, when children are formed over decades, and when families leave legacies over generations."

"Others pretend the matter has been settled and there is no need to return to a contentious debate. What about an election promise? Prime Minister Harperís position on marriage was one of the factors responsible for his election last year; he is to be commended for sticking to his guns on this crucial issue."

"Still others say that the die is cast, and that turning back the clock would be too hurtful to those who, in good faith, took advantage of the legislation over the past few months. Yet the historical and spiritual significance of marriage was never properly debated. The sociological experiment that has been introduced was never adequately studied. All this affects vastly greater numbers of Canadians in ways still uncertain."

He asked that the Catholics in his dioceses:

"Pray especially for our homosexual brothers and sisters. Reach out to them, recognizing that as cherished children of God we all need the support of each other, on a journey that is sometimes difficult and uncertain."

His letter implies that this support is not to include equal marriage protections for same-sex couples and their children. 3

Sponsored link:

2006-NOV-09: Coalition of religious conservatives holds press conference:

A press conference was held in Ottawa concerning marriage equality. Religious leaders -- all of whom were from the religious right -- urged the government to proceed with the motion to reopen debate and give SSM "a sober second thought."

bulletBruce Clemenger, president of the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada (EFC), called for a debate "... on the definition and nature of marriage."

bulletJanet Epp Buckingham, director of law and public policy for the EFC noted that the Supreme Court of Canada did not answer the fourth reference question which asked whether the Charter of Rights and Freedoms requires SSM to be available in Canada. She said:

"They didn't say the heterosexual [only] definition [of marriage] was unconstitutional. It is constitutionally permissible to change the definition but the court didn't rule as to whether that was a requirement. It said you can do it, but you don't have to do it."

She suggests that Parliament could pass new legislation that would deny same-sex couples the right to marry, but offer them civil union status with similar benefits and obligations. This would be the separate but "sort of" equal arrangement seen in the U.S. states  Connecticut, and Vermont at one time. However, the "separate but equal" system proved to be very separate and not at all equal. They eventually authorized same-sex marriage.

bulletCharles McVety, head of the Canada Family Action Coalition and president of the fundamentalist Canada Christian College has asked the government to conduct a study of SSM and its effects on society.

bulletJoseph Ben-Ami, executive director of the Institute for Canadian Values, a conservative religious think-tank, said

"We had [only] about two weeks or thereabouts of what can only be called sham hearings last year on what is arguably the most important piece of social policy legislation we've passed in this country in a generation. We also think it's good government practice to review policy after a reasonable amount of time to ensure it's not having unintended consequences." 4

As of mid-2011, same-sex marriage had been legal in Massachusetts for over seven years -- the longest of any U.S. State. Massachusetts remains the state with the lowest divorce rate in the U.S. So, it would appear that same-sex marriage is not adversely affecting the institution of marriage.

horizontal rule

2006-NOV-12: Survey by the Toronto Star newspaper:

The Toronto Star newspaper conducted a poll of members of parliament by Emails and follow-up phone calls concerning the reconsideration of SSM. They found that of the 246 MPs who responded:

bullet141 said they would vote against reopening the debate
bullet58 said they would vote to reconsider SSM
bullet47 declined to respond.

Laurie Arron, national co-ordinator for Canadians for Equal Marriage -- a gay positive group -- said:

"Because you don't know who's going to be in the House at the time of the vote, we're more interested in spreads, and we have a 35-vote spread. For us to lose this vote is inconceivable at this point.

MP Bryon Wilfert (Liberal, Richmond Hill, ON) voted against marriage equality in 2006. He said:

"It's disingenuous of this Prime Minister to suggest a free vote that will lead to an overturning of the legislation, especially considering the fact that the Supreme Court has ruled on this, and it's pretty much been ruled on [by courts] in every province and territory. ... No vote in the House of Commons will lead to a change. So this is an attempt to placate traditional voters and say 'It didn't pass the House'. ... [Since SSM became available] The world hasn't collapsed. It's the law of the land and I think we waste far too much time consumed with an issue the courts have already ruled on when we should be talking about more important issues, such as the environment."

MP Ramond Simard (Liberal, Manitoba) also voted against SSM in 2005. He said:

"It was a terribly tough debate -- heart wrenching. I can't see us bringing it back. I think several of our members feel the same way."

Brenda Chamberlain (Liberal, Guelph, ON) also voted against SSM. She said that the motion to reopen debate is a red herring:

"It's fundamentally dishonest. If Mr. Harper wants to repeal the marriages that have already gone through, then put that on the table. If he wants to change the law, put that on the table.

Some MPs believe that the Prime Minister's motion is a political ploy so that he can blame the Liberal MPs when it fails. Meanwhile he will be able to say to his religious conservative support base that he really tried. Some suggest that Prime Minister Harper is hoping that the motion will fail so that he will not have to experience the legal quagmire in the event that the SSM law is changed. 4

horizontal rule

2006-NOV-22: SSM to be revisited soon:

Canada's Justice Minister, Vic Toews, announced that a motion will be brought before Parliament sometime before DEC-15 -- start of the Christmas break. It will decide whether to revisit the same-sex marriage legislation. MPs will be asked whether they want to debate terminating marriage equality in Canada.

horizontal rule

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1. "Bishop says Parliament made 'terrible mistake' in approving same-sex marriage," Catholic News Agency, 2006-AUG-24, at: http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/
  2. " 'Religious agenda' fails to toss Turner. No challenger in Halton riding. Tory MP to be acclaimed," Toronto Star, 2006-AUG-22, at: http://www.thestar.com/
  3. Terrence Prendergast, "A pastoral message to the faithful," Archdiocese of Halifax, 2006-SEP-06, at: http://www.catholichalifax.org/
  4. Andrew Chung, "Revisiting same-sex marriage," Toronto Star, 2006-NOV-12, Page A13.
  5. "Tories plan December vote on same-sex marriage," CBC  News, 2006-NOV-28, at: http://www.cbc.ca/
  6. "Re-opening debate scheduled to start Wed, DEC-6. Will Stephen Harper admit the issue is settled?," Canadians for Equal Marriage, 2006-NOV-28?, at: http://www.equal-marriage.ca/

horizontal rule

Site navigation:

 Home page > Homosexuality > Same-sex marriage > Canada > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2005 t0 2011 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance.
Essay first posted on 2006-NOV-12
Latest update: 2011-AUG-14
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)

Sponsored link


horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or go to the Canadian same-sex marriage menu, or choose:

horizontal rule

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?


Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sponsored links