Sponsored links
|
Summary of recent activity:Same-sex marriages (SSMs) became available in California from 2008-MAY unil election day in 2008-NOV. On the latter date, Proposition 8 was narrowly passed by a public vote. It prohibits future SSMs in California. However, those SSMs solemnized between MAY and election day of 2008 remain valid. This event is one more example for same-sex couples who want to get married. If marriage equality is achieved in your state, you might want to get married with all possible speed. There is absolutely no guarantee that this right will still be available next year, next month, or even on the next day. The constitutionaliy of Prop. 8 is being challenged in the federal court system. Federal District Judge Vaughn Walker ruled that Proposition 8 is clearly unconstitutional on a number of grounds. The proponents of Prop. 8 are now attempting to appeal Judge Walker's ruling in the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The first day of hearings was Monday, 2010-DEC-06. An attempt to vacate Judge Walker's ruling because he is gay was rejected. The California Supreme Court heard arguments on whether the official proponents of Prop. 8 -- ProtectMarriage.com -- have the legal standing to attempt to defend it. The court decided that they did. This was a critical decision because the Governor and Attorney General of California who clearly have legal standing have refused to defend Prop. 8's constitutionality. David Boies is co-counsel in the federal case that challenges the constitutionality of Proposition 8. During 2011-OCT, he predicted that his case and one of the 12 or so lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of DOMA would probably arrive at the U.S. Supreme Court for consideration during its 2012-OCT term. He said: "I think that’s probably when both cases get there and I suspect they’ll consolidate them for argument." 1 The DOMA law overturned more than two centuries of tradition by stating that the federal government would not recognize marriages legally solemnized in states and registered there if the spouses were of the same gender. Latest developments:
The following topics are covered in this section:The recognition of same-sex relationships (or lack thereof) by the government, courts and the public:
Path 1: 1999 to 2007: Unsuccessful attempts towards marriage equality through the Legislature:
Path 2: 2004 to 2008: Temporarily successful attempt towards marriage equality through the courts:
|
| Amendments to ban same-sex marriage by VoteYesMarriage.com and Protect Marriage.com |
|
| Prop. 8 approved for 2008-NOV vote |
|
| Attempts to stall & rewrite Prop. 8 |
|
| What did the polls predict? |
|
| Events culminating in the vote on Prop 8 |
|
| If Prop 8 is accepted by the courts, what will be
its effect? |
|
| The immediate aftermath of Prop 8 |
|
| Legal action following the passage of Prop. 8 |
|
| The future of Prop. 8 |
|
| Amici briefs in favor of marriage equality &
in opposition to Prop. 8 |
|
| Amici briefs in opposition to marriage
equality & in support of Prop. 8 |
|
| 2009 to now: activity attempting to have Prop. 8 declared unconstitutional: |
![]()
| 2010-APR: CA Senate Bill 906 |
The following information source was used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlink is not necessarily still active today.
Home page > "Hot" topics > Homosexuality > Couples > SSM > here |
![]()
Copyright © 2001 to 2010 by Ontario Consultants on Religious
Tolerance
Latest update: 2011-DEC-13
Author: B.A. Robinson
![]()
|
|
|
Sponsored link: