Quantcast


Twitter icon


Facebook icon

About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD of this site
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
Christian def'n
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret the Bible
 Persons
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
 Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment

Same-sex marriage

Homosexuality
Human rights
Gays in the military
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

Sponsored links

 

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

Same-sex marriage (SSM) in New Mexico:

Menu

2004: Temporary sale of marriage licenses.
2011: Polls. Unsuccessful legislative activity.
2013: Court actions to legalize same-sex marriages.
Marriage equality arrives 1 county at a time.
New Mexico Supreme Court to decide SSM case.
New advocacy group formed. 3 professional groups
support marriage equality.
star symbolDEC-19: New Mexico Supreme Court
unanimously rules in favor of marriage equality.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.

horizontal rule

Quotations:

bullet

"If marriage means everything, it means absolutely nothing." Dr. James C. Dobson, of Focus on the Family.


bullet "A loving man and woman in a committed relationship can marry. Dogs, no matter what their relationship, are not allowed to marry. How should society treat gays and lesbians in committed relationships? As dogs or as humans?" A posting to an Internet mailing list; used by permission of the author.

horizontal rule

Background:

Prior to 2004, loving, committed same-sex couples in New Mexico were recognized only as roommates. They and their children had no real status as a family under state law. They were not allowed to marry or enter a civil union or enter a domestic partnership. They were considered "legal strangers" to each other. In 2004, one county clerk started to distribute marriage licenses to same-sex couples. However, in a matter of hours, the Attorney General issued an opinion that the licenses were not valid and that any couples who married would be forcibly divorced by the state.

Between 2004 and early 2013, the Legislature attempted to create civil unions through legislation. That failed. They tried to authorize a plebiscite to be held on election day in early 2014-NOV. If passed by the voters, it would amend the state Constitution to allow same-sex marriages. That also failed. Finally they tried to authorize a plebiscite on that day to amend the Constitution to ban same-sex marriage. That also failed.

The big breakthrough happened on 2013-JUN-26 when the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) handed down its ruling in Windsor v. United States. This found that the main section of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was unconstitutional. As originally written, It had prevented the federal government from recognizing any marriages by same-sex couples that had been legally solemnized in any state. This required the government to withhold the 1,138 federal protections and benefits from same-sex married couples that were routinely given to opposite-sex married couples. The court ruled that DOMA violated the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of equal liberty, and wrote inequality into federal law. Justice Kennedy wrote:

"DOMA’s principal effect is to identify a subset of state-sanctioned marriages and make them unequal." 4

He also wrote:

"DOMA undermines both the public and private significance of state-sanctioned same-sex marriages; for it tells those couples, and all the world, that their otherwise valid marriages are unworthy of federal recognition. This places same-sex couples in an unstable position of being in a second-tier marriage. The differentiation demeans the couple, whose moral and sexual choices the Constitution protects ... and whose relationship the state has sought to dignify. And it humiliates tens of thousands of children now being raised by same-sex couples.

He wrote that the purpose of the law was to impose a disadvantage and:

"... a stigma upon all who enter into same-sex marriages made lawful by the unquestioned authority of the states."

He concluded that:

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment." 5

The arguments and conclusion reached by SCOTUS in the DOMA decision triggered many subsequent lawsuits that challenged restrictions on same-sex marriage in individual states.

In New Mexico, this ruling by SCOTUS, coupled with the equality clauses in the U.S. Constitution, the lack of a ban on same-sex marriage in the state Constitution, and no clear ban within the state marriage statutes caused some elected state officials to reconsider whether such marriages should be made available. Lynn Ellins, the County Clerk of Dona Ana County in south central New Mexico began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, starting on 2013-AUG-21. He said that he had reviewed state laws, and presumably the New Mexico Constitution, and had concluded that the:

"... state's marriage statutes are gender neutral and do not expressly prohibit Dona Ana County from issuing marriage licenses to same-gender couples."

Within days, the First Judicial District Court in Santa Fe county in north-central New Mexico issued an order that the Santa Fe county clerk start to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

As of 2013-AUG-25, two court cases involving same-sex marriage are active in New Mexico's state court system.

By 2013-AUG-30, seven counties were issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Three county clerks made this decision on their own. In four other counties four separate state District Courts ordered them to do so. An appeal to the New Mexico Supreme Court was heard on OCT-23.

Some commentators expect a ruling by mid-November. It came on DEC-19 when the Court unanimously declared that the state marriage laws conflicted with the state Constitution, and that same-sex marriage was legal.

horizontal rule

Topics covered in this section:

horizontal rule
Site navigation:

Home > Religious info. > Basic > Marriage > SSM > SSM sub menu > here

Home > "Hot" topics > Homosexuality > SSM > SSM sub menu > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2004 to 2013 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally written: 2004-FEB-21
Latest update: 2013-DEC-16
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

Go to the previous page, or go to the same-sex marriage menu or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays... 


Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

 
Sponsored links