Twitter icon


Facebook icon

About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD of this site
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
Christian def'n
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret the Bible
 Persons
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
 Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment

Same-sex marriage

Homosexuality
Human rights
Gays in the military
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

Sponsored links

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

Same-sex marriage (SSM)

Menu

Civil unions & same-sex marriage in New Jersey

horizontal rule


Sponsored link.

horizontal rule

Quotations:

bullet "If marriage means everything, it means absolutely nothing." Dr. James C. Dobson, of Focus on the Family.
 
bullet "A loving man and woman in a committed relationship can marry. Dogs, no matter what their relationship, are not allowed to marry. How should society treat gays and lesbians in committed relationships? As dogs or as humans?" A posting to an Internet mailing list; used by permission of the author.
 
bullet "All persons are by nature free and independent, and have certain natural and unalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and of pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness." Article 1, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constitution.
 
bullet "The couples, declaring they were tired of paying first-class taxes while being treated like second-class citizens, demanded the state allow them to marry just like their heterosexual friends, family, and neighbors." Excerpt from a Lambda news release concerning the New Jersey same-sex marriage lawsuit. 1
 
bullet "We want to say 'we're married' and have our community instantly understand the kind of loving relationship that we have -- that we're in it for the long haul, through thick and thin." Saundra Heath, plaintiff. 1
 
bullet "We shouldn't have to jump through a million hoops to prove who we are to each other, and even then not be treated as equal to other couples." Alicia Toby, plaintiff and Saundra's partner. 1

bullet "You’ve confused a war on religion with not always getting what you want." Jon Stewart, commenting on the conservative religious belief that same-sex marriage will endanger religious liberty and freedom.

horizontal rule

Time line of the drive to same-sex marriage (SSM):

Gays, lesbians, and bisexuals in several U.S. states have launched lawsuits to force their states to expand the legal definition of marriage to include same sex couples. Of these, the case in Massachusetts was successful. A similar movement in Canada granted same-sex couples the right to marry across the entire country in 2005-JUL. During early 2009, a number of New England states considered bills to create same-sex marriage legislation; all but one enlarged the definition of marriage -- for the third redefinition in the history of the United States -- to include loving, committed same-sex couples. (The previous two cases were in the mid 19th century when African Americans were allowed to marry, and during the 1960s when interracial couples were allowed to marry.)

The next logical states to consider SSM were:

  • New York because it has the second highest public support for SSM. A law enabling SSM in New York was passed on 2011-JUN-24 and becomes effective on 2011-JUL-24.

  • Rhode Island has the highest support for SSM, but the influence of the Roman Catholic Church is also high in that state and a movement towards SSM is unlikely for a while. A bill to create civil unions there became law in mid-2011.

  • New Jersey because it had 49% support in 2008/2009. It currently has a margin of 10 percentage points between the number of supporters and the number of people opposing SSM. With a current margin of this size, even a large fear-based advertising campaign would be unlikely to sway voters to oppose SSM.

    Six New Jersey public opinion polls by Quinnipiac University between 2006 and 2012 show a significant rise in support and drop in opposition for SSM:

    Date
    Support
    Opposition
    Don't know,
    or no anwser
    Margin of support in percentage points
    2006-NOV
    41%
    50%
    9%
    -9%
    2006-DEC
    44%
    50%

    5%

    -6%
    2009-APR
    49%
    43%
    8%
    +6%
    2009-NOV
    46%
    49%
    6%
    -3%
    2012-JAN
    52%
    42%
    6%
    +10%
    2012-MAR
    57%
    37%
    6%
    +20%

The great increase in support in the 2012-MAR ocurred just after Governor Chris Christie's (R) veto.

A case in which New Jersey same-sex couples petitioned for permission to marry was heard in late 2003-JUN by the New Jersey Superior court. Same-sex couples achieved a partial victory in 2006-OCT when the Supreme Court of New Jersey ordered the legislature to either:

  • Expand the definition of marriage to include same-sex couples, or

  • Create a civil union type system that is is equivalent to marriage, without the name "marriage."

The legislature took the second option.

In late 2007, two bills were introduced to allow all committed couples in New Jersey to marry, whether of the same-sex or opposite-sex. They did not proceed.

Another attempt was made in late 2009 to legalize SSM in New Jersey. The state Senate killed the bill by a vote of 14 for and 20 against.

During 2010-MAR, same-sex couples returned to the state Supreme Court in an attempt to have SSMs legalized. This was rejected; the plaintiffs were asked to restart their court battle at the superior court level.

During 2011-JUN, still another bill was introduced to the Assembly. It was passed by the Legislature but vetoed by the Governor. The legislature has until 2014-JAN to try to overturn the Governor's veto.

On 2012-DEC-05, Public Policy Polling announced their latest poll of New Jersey voters concerning same-sex marriage:

  • 53% support SSM while 36% are in opposition for a margin of 17 percentage points. 12% are undecided or didn't answer.

  • 72% support having voters decide whether to legalize SSM; 16% disagree; 12% are undecided or didn't answer. 2

horizontal rule

Current status:

  • A SSM bill was approved by the Senate and Assembly, but vetoed on 2012-FEB-17 by Governor Chris Christie (R). The Legislature probably does not have sufficient votes to override the veto.

  • Seven same-sex couples have initiated a lawsuit in state court an attempt to prove that the civil union law has failed to give them and their children rights, privileges and protections equal to marriage, as ordered by the court back in 2006.

horizontal rule

Topics covered in this section:

bullet Background material. Launching the Lewis et. al. v. Harris et. al. lawsuit
 
bullet Progress of the lawsuit
 
bullet Decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court
 
bullet The civil union bill and law
 
bullet

The conflict between a NJ lesbian couple who wanted a civil union ceremony, and the Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association

bullet Public opinion polls concerning same-sex marriage and marriage equality:  
bullet Is same-sex marriage next?
 
bullet

Attempts to legalize same-sex marriage:

bullet

Lawsuit involving the religious freedom to discriminate:

  • Same-sex couple seeks equal treatment; Methodist group seeks the freedom to discriminate: Part 1   Part 2   Part3

horizontal rule

Reference used:

  1. "Sweeping Gay Marriage Lawsuit in New Jersey Aims for U.S. History," Lambda news release, 2002-JUN-26, at: http://www.lambdalegal.org/
  2. "Illinois and New Jersey support gay marriage" Public Policy Polling, 2012-DEC-05, at: http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/

horizontal rule

Site navigation: Home > Homosexuality > Same-sex marriage > Menu > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2002 to 2012 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally written: 2002-JUL-02
Latest update: 2012-DEC-23
Author: B.A. Robinson
line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

Go to the previous page, or go to the same-sex marriage menu or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

 
Sponsored links