MENU:
Media reports about same-sex marriages,
civil unions, and domestic partnerships


Recent developments:
The Bible recognized eight different forms of marriage.
However, since biblical times, the range of allowable marriages had generally
been restricted to only the "one-woman, one-man" form. In the U.S. and Canada,
marriage was a special privilege reserved only for
opposite-sex couples....until recently.
Times are changing:
 | In 2000-DEC, marriage in the Netherlands was extended to same-sex
couples. More details. |
 | During mid-2003, in Ontario and British Columbia, Canada, senior
provincial courts ordered their provinces to start marrying same-sex
couples. More details. |
 | In the state of Massachusetts, SSM became available in 2004-MAY. More details. |
 | A number of cities and counties and cities across the U.S. started issuing
marriage licenses to same-sex couples in 2004-FEB. However, states
refused to register them. More details. |
 | By the end of 2004, 87% of Canadians lived in a province or
territory that allowed same-sex marriage. |
 | In 2005-JAN, a New York court ruled that SSM was required by the
state constitution. |
 | In 2005-FEB, the Canadian federal government introduced C-38, a bill to
make SSM available throughout all of Canada. It became law on 2006-JUL-20. |
As of early 2007, same-sex couples can marry in Massachusetts or California, get "civil
unionized" in Connecticut, New Jersey or Vermont. All obtain the full set of state rights, obligations
and privileges as are routinely extended to married opposite-sex couples.
However, the over 1,000 federal benefits given to opposite-sex couples are
denied them.

Sponsored link:

Media accounts by year, from 1999 until the present:

Site navigation:

Copyright © 2001 to 2008 by Ontario
Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Latest update: 2008-JUL-22
Author: B.A. Robinson

|