About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Your first visit?
Contact us
External links
Good books
Visitor essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
 Who is a Christian?
 Shared beliefs
 Handle change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret Bible
 Persons
 Beliefs, creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
 Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing religions

Non-theistic...
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic info.
Gods/Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt/security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
World's end
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science/Religion
More info.

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality/ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Relig. tolerance
Relig. freedom
Relig. hatred
Relig. conflict
Relig. violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
10 command.
Abortion
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment
Homosexuality
Human rights
Gay marriage
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking kids
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

 

Web site logo

Gays in the U.S. Military

History of US military
policies, and other topics

Sponsored link.

History of US military policies towards gays, lesbians & bisexuals:

bullet1776: First discharge: General George Washington approved the dishonorable discharge of Lieutenant Frederick Gotthold Enslin who had been found guilty of sodomy and perjury. At the time "sodomy" or "crime against nature" could involve either oral or anal sexual intercourse. 14
 
bullet1942: Separation policy: Previous to World War II, sexually active homosexuals could be prosecuted under the Articles of War. Starting in 1942 persons with a homosexual or bisexual orientation -- even though celibate -- could alternately be given a "blue discharge" and separated from the armed forces. They would not be eligible for the Veterans Administration's G.I. Bill benefits. 14
 
bullet1947: Blue discharges replaced: A member of the armed forces who was found to have a homosexual or bisexual orientation while in-service would now receive an "undesirable discharge." Any found guilty of same-sex behavior would be "dishonorably discharged."
 
bullet1957: Crittenden Report: Navy Captain S.H. Crittenden, Jr. conducted a United States Navy Board of Inquiry and issued a "Report of the Board Appointed to Prepare and Submit Recommendations to the Secretary of the Navy for the Revision of Policies, Procedures and Directives Dealing With Homosexuals. It found that there was "no sound basis for the belief that homosexuals posed a security risk." 12 The report found that "...the number of cases of blackmail as a result of past investigations of homosexuals is negligible." Apparently, the Navy found the report too threatening to release. 13 Twenty years and one court order later, the Navy was forced to make the report publicly available. Two more studies, conducted between 1957 and 1987 reached the same conclusion.
 
bullet1975: Test case launched: After 12 years of exemplary service in the Air Force, Tech. Sgt. Leonard Matlovich, agreed to create a test case challenging the armed forces' discriminatory policies against gays and bisexuals. He had received a Bronze Star, a Purple Heart, and shrapnel wounds in service to his country. He volunteered to tell his superiors that he was gay, and went public with his situation. His case was covered on the front page of the New York Times, He made the cover of Time Magazine for 1975-SEP-08. All of the major TV news programs covered the story. He fought for an honorable discharge for years in the courts. He was finally successful; the court ruled that the Air Force had failed to justify their discrimination against him.


bullet1992: Clinton promised to lift the ban on homosexuals and bisexuals: While campaigning for the Presidency, Bill  Clinton promised to eliminate the ban on homosexuals and bisexuals in the military, and allow qualified persons of all sexual orientations to serve.
 
bullet1993-JUL-19: "Don't ask, don't tell policy (DADT):" President Clinton, faced with strong opposition from military leaders, broke his promise by introducing the DADT policy. He said that the policy would establish:

"... a decent regard for the legitimate privacy and associational rights of all service members." 3 " 'Don't Tell,' while prohibiting public statements of sexual orientation to the military, allows for 'personal and private' communications between gay service members and their families, friends and others. It protects service members' freedom of association with friends and extracurricular organizations. The policy further allows for [confidential] disclosure of sexual orientation by gay service members to defense attorneys, chaplains, security clearance personnel and, in limited circumstances, doctors who are treating patients for HIV." 4

However, gays, lesbians and bisexuals are effectively cut off from counseling and other mental health services because physicians, psychologists and others are not required to keep confidential any conversations during therapy. Some therapists and doctors routinely report any non-heterosexuals that they find to their commanding officers for investigation. Many gays and lesbians who are the victims of harassment or assault often dare not report the incidents out of fear of being ejected from the military. This frequently makes them sitting ducks for homophobes who enjoy engaging in gay bashing.
 

bullet 2000-MAR status report on harassment in the military: The Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (SLDN) issued a report on 2000-MAR-9 titled "Conduct Unbecoming: Sixth annual report on "Don't ask, don't tell, don't pursue, don't harass." 1 The SLDN is the main legal support group defending gays and lesbians in the military. They are widely known throughout the armed forces as a safe, confidential, underground network. The SLDN report cited:
bullet968 incidences of harassment of gays and lesbians in the armed forces reported to them by individual servicemen and women 1999.
 
bulletThe 1999 events ranged in severity from taunts and physical assaults to the murder of Pfc. Barry Winchell at Ft. Campbell, KY.
 
bulletThis represents a 142% increase over 1998 and about a 500% increase over 1997. It is not known whether these data are related to an actual increase in harassment or whether the increase can be attributed to the SLDN having a higher profile.
 
bulletIncidents remained fairly constant during 1999, with a slight increase noted after the murder.
 
bulletThey reported that: "Witch hunts, physical abuse by investigators, and criminal prosecutions of lesbian, gay and bisexual service members have all subsided."
 
bulletDischarges for homosexuality dropped 10 percent from 1998, after several years of steady increases. 
 
bulletThere were 1,034 discharges in 1999 related to homosexuality -- a 73 percent increase from before "Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Pursue" policy was announced by President Clinton.
 
bulletDischarges are on the rise for women. Although only 14% of the armed force personnel are women, lesbians accounted for 31% of the sexual orientation based discharges in 1999 -- the highest percentage in at least two decades.
 
bulletThe U.S. Air Force continues to lead all services in gay discharges.
 
bulletThe SLDN rated the Army's training course against homophobia as the most effective in the forces. 2

On the day that the SLDN report was released, the Pentagon announced that it was considering changing a policy that would allow gay service members to be granted confidentiality when they discuss matters with a doctor, psychologist, or other health professional. Without confidentiality during therapy, gays and lesbians are largely cut off from counseling within the armed forces. Yet, of all groups within the military, homosexuals may well be the one most in need of a safety valve. The current policy is ambiguous: health care workers are neither required to remain silent about a client's sexual orientation, nor are they required to report gays and lesbians. Michelle Benecke, Executive Director of SLDN responded:

"That's excellent! That is really big news. That is the first time they have ever given a centimeter on that...it's a very serious issue to our clients...Medical- and mental-health people provide a real relief valve for service members in trouble. There are people who've been driven to suicide because there is no safe place for them to go with this secret."

bullet2007-Fall: Obama commits to ending DADT: Barack Obama, while on the campaign trail in 2007 addressed the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) saying: "America is ready to get rid of the 'don't ask, don't tell' policy. That work should have started long ago. It will start when I take office."
 
bullet2009-JAN-15: Ending DADT must wait: Robert Gibbs, a spokesperson for President Obama, said:

"There are many challenges facing our nation now and the president-elect is focused first and foremost on jump-starting this economy. So not everything will get done in the beginning but he's committed to following through with ending the policy against being openly gay in the military." 16

bullet2009-APR-30: West Point debate on gays in the military: Two students at the West Point, NY, military academy debated President Obama's pledge to end the DADT policy in the military. Daniel Szatkowski, a senior from Edmond, OK said: "From what I?ve heard from my classmates, people are kind of against it." Adrienne Rolle, a senior from Brooklyn, NY said she had no problem with lifting the ban, although she said that some of her male classmates did. Commenting on the fact that homosexuals are currently serving in the military, she said: "People are more comfortable with ignorance.

Other pressures to abandon the "don't ask, don't tell" policy:

bulletRepresentative Marty Meehan (D-MA) introduced a House bill: the Military Readiness Enhancement Act. It would lift the military's ban on homosexuals. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), a member of the Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats and International Relations said:

"We've tried the policy. I don't think it works. And we've spent a lot of money enforcing it. People who've signed up to serve our country, we should be thanking them."

Four Republican representatives -- including conservatives Wayne Gilchrest of Maryland -- joined with 81 Democrats as co-sponsors. Gilchrest used to be in favor of the ban, but changed his mind because of respect for gay Marines with whom he served in Vietnam. Another influence is his brother, who is gay. He feels that the mood in Congress is shifting. He said:

"When this issue comes up, members who believe that gays shouldn't be in the military are now more hesitant to voice their opinion. Many of us who feel the other way have come out of the closet, so to speak. A year ago, I would have been uncomfortable expressing my feelings."  9,10

bulletThe Servicemembers Legal Defense Network issued a new report on 2005-JUN-13 noting that many highly trained military specialists -- including combat engineers and linguists -- are being discharged involuntarily because of their sexual orientation. Meanwhile, the Pentagon "... is facing extreme challenges in recruiting and retaining troops." Their report states that:

"The military discharged 653 men and women in 2004 under the gay ban, the second lowest total since 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' was implemented. The Pentagon discharges include at least 41 healthcare professionals, 30 sonar and radar specialists, 20 combat engineers, 17 law enforcement agents, 12 security guards and 7 biological and chemical warfare specialists who were fired because of sexual orientation. At least 9 language specialists were also discharged. The SLDN analysis also reveals that, based on other data obtained from different sources, less than one-quarter of all 2004 discharges under 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' were from units deployed in support of war operations, suggesting the services are far less likely to discharge gays and lesbians serving on the frontlines. Gay discharges have declined by 47% since September 11, 2001."


SLDN Executive Director, C. Dixon Osburn, said:

"The military continues to sacrifice national security and military readiness in favor of simple prejudice. Americans do not care if the helicopter pilot rescuing a wounded soldier or the medic treating that soldier is gay." 8,10

bulletTwelve former service members have launched a lawsuit against the policy. It cites the U.S. Supreme Court's 2003 ruling in Lawrence v. Texas, which declared all state anti-sodomy laws to be unconstitutional across the U.S. The Bush administration is expected to ask that the lawsuit be dismissed. They take the position that the Court's ruling has no bearing over this matter because it does not impact on the military. The case will be heard in a Boston, MA federal court during 2005-JUL. 10
 
bulletLt. Col. Allen Bishop, a U.S. Military Academy professor of philosophy at West Point, had been troubled for years about the ban. In the spring of 2005, he wrote an article against the ban in the Army Times. On JUN-14, he said:

"I thought I'd get lots of hate mail, and my colleagues would walk on the other side of the hall ? but there's been none of that.....They can be gay, but they can't practice being gay. They can be here, but they can't tell you who they are ? it seemed pretty confusing to me."

His article said in part:

"Despite our government's claim of liberty for all, we leave homosexuals out. If the American military sees and is allowed to see itself as the protector of some but not all Americans, democracy fails." 10

Statements by retired senior military officers:

bullet2006-MAY: General calls for end to DADT policy: Lieutenant General Claudia Kennedy, USA (Ret.), the first female three-star officer in Army history, called the DADT: "a hollow policy that serves no useful purpose." 23
 
bullet2006-NOV: Senior military officers recommend end to ban: Fourteen senior retired military officers urged the First Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn the DADT ban. They wrote that the law:

"... undermines the military's ability to fulfill its primary mission of providing national security by discouraging the enlistment of gay persons qualified to serve their country and by expelling from the military those who have served with honor." 23

Retired Army general and former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff John Shalikashvili wrote:

"Last year I held a number of meetings with gay soldiers and marines, including some with combat experience in Iraq, and an openly gay senior sailor who was serving effectively as a member of a nuclear submarine crew. These conversations showed me just how much the military has changed, and that gays and lesbians can be accepted by their peers."

bullet2007-JAN: General John M. Shalikashvili suggested review of ban: Shalikashvili, a former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, wrote an op-ed piece for the New York Times, recommending a reconsideration of the DADT policy. He wrote:
"I now believe that if gay men and lesbians served openly in the United States military, they would not undermine the efficacy of the armed forces. ... Our military has been stretched thin by our deployments in the Middle East, and we must welcome the service of any American who is willing and able to do the job." 23
bullet2008-DEC: General Colin Powell favors review of DADT: Retired General Colin Powell, who was chairman of the joint chiefs of staffs in 1993 when DADT was implemented, said:
"It's been 15 years and attitudes have changed. And, so, I think it is time for the Congress, since it is their law, to have a full review of it. And I'm quite sure that's what President-elect Obama will want to do." 16

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1. "The ABC of the European Union - citizenship: Fundamental rights," at: http://europa.eu.int/abc/cit1_en.htm 
  2. "Judgements in the Cases of Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. The United Kingdom and Smith and Grady v. The United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights," (1999) See: http://www.echr.coe.int/eng/Judgments.htm 
  3. President W.J. Clinton, "Text of Remarks Announcing the New Policy," Washington Post, 1993-JUL-20, Page A12.
  4. "Conduct Unbecoming: Sixth annual report on Don't ask, don't tell, don't pursue, don't harass.", Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (SLDN), 2000-MAR-9 at: http://www.sldn.org/reports/sixth.htm SLDN's home page is at: http://www.sldn.org/ 
  5. David Cullen, "Conduct unbecoming: A new report details the sharp increase of gays in the military," Salon.com, 2000-MAR-10, at: http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/03/10/gays/index.html
  6. Homo Base, in operation since 1995, bills itself as the first Internet web site for gay service members. Their home page is at: http://homobase.com/ A valuable research page with many links to other support web sites is at: http://homobase.com/research.htm 
  7. Barry M. Goldwater, "Ban on gays is senseless attempt to stall the inevitable." at: http://homobase.com/
  8. "New Data Reveals Military Losing Mission Critical Specialists Under 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'," Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, 2005-JUN-13, at: http://www.sldn.org/
  9. "New Poll Shows Overwhelming Support for Allowing Gays to Serve," Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, 2005-MAY-16, at: http://www.sldn.org/
  10. "Efforts Intensify to End Gay Soldier-Ban," Associated Press, 2005-JUN-14, at: http://www.sfgate.com/
  11. Scott S. Greenberger, "One year later, nation divided on gay marriage. Split seen by region, age, Globe poll finds," Boston Globe, 2005-MAY-15, at: http://www.boston.com/
  12. Chuck Stewart, "Homosexuality and the Law," Page 81 & 82. Online at: http://books.google.com.au/
  13. K. Dyer, "Gays in Uniform: The Pentagon Secret Report," Alyson Press, (1990).
  14. "Don't ask, don't tell," Wikipedia as at: 2009-JUN-09, at: http://en.wikipedia.org/
  15. "Leonard Matlovich," at: http://www.leonardmatlovich.com/
  16. "Obama aide: 'Ending don't ask don't tell must wait," CNN, 2009-JAN-15, at: http://www.cnn.com/
  17. "Law and civil rights," Polling Report, at: http://www.pollingreport.com/
  18. John Zogby, et al., "Opinions of Military Personnel on Sexual Minorities in the Military," 2006-DEC, at: http://www.palmcenter.org/ This is a PDF file
  19. Kyle Dropp & Jon Cohen, "Acceptance of Gay People in Military Grows Dramatically," Washington Post, 2009-JUL-19, at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/
  20. "Washington Post-ABC News Poll," 2008-JUL-10-13, Washington Post, at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ (search for the question "33.")
  21. "GOP platform comparison," Focus on the Family, at: http://www.citizenlink.org/
  22. "The ban on gays in the military," Editorial, New York Times, 2009-JUN-09, at: http://www.nytimes.com/
  23. "General Wants Gay Ban Lifted," Military.com, 2007-JAN-03, at: http://www.military.com/

Site navigation:

Home > "Hot" topics > Homosexuality & Bisexuality > Challenges > here

Copyright © 2000 to 2009 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally written: 2000-MAR-16
Latest update: 2009-JUN-14
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

Go to the previous page, or return to the "Gays in the military" menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?