About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Your first visit?
Contact us
External links
Good books
Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
 Christian def'n
 Shared beliefs
 Handle change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret Bible
 Persons
 Beliefs, creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
 Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic...
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic info.
Gods/Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt/security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
World's end
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science/Religion
More info.

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality/ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Relig. tolerance
Relig. freedom
Relig. hatred
Relig. conflict
Relig. violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
10 command.
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment
Gay marriage
Homosexuality
Human rights
Military/LGBT
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking kids
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

Sponsored links

 

Web site logo

Longitudinal U.S. public opinion polls
on same-sex marriage and civil unions

Newsweek polls. Conclusions

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.

horizontal rule

Newsweek polls 1,2 (Continued from an earlier essay):

Trends in the way that the public prefers that same-sex relationships be recognized ... or not:
Topic 2004 support 2006 support 2008 support
Support full marriage rights 28% 24% 31%
Support civil unions or domestic partnerships 23 27 32
Oppose any recognition; treat them as simple roommates 43 37 30

The percentage of the public who favors some form of recognition of same-sex relationships that would give loving, committed same-sex couples rights and protections for themselves and their children has risen from 51% in 2004 and 2006 to 63% in 2008 -- almost 2 to 1.

In every category, data for 2008 shows significantly more support for homosexual rights than for the year 2004.

The effect of age: the generation gap:

The Newsweek poll also reported responses by age groups. They showed a consistent trend in which young adults are more supportive of equal rights for gays and lesbians, whereas older adults are less supportive. For example, on the question whether gays and lesbians be allowed to marry, results were:
Age group In favor  Opposed Don't know/
refuse answer
18 to 34 51% 40% 9%
35 to 44 43 54 3
45  to 64 38 58 4
65+ 22 69 9
All ages 39 55 6

horizontal rule

Comments:

Polls on such an emotionally laden topic as same-sex marriage and other legal recognition of the relationships of loving, committed same-sex couples are sensitive to many factors. The results will vary according to:

bulletThe question(s) raised before the question on same-sex marriage: If they result in a negative response from the subject, they may carry this mood over to the SSM question(s).

bulletThe language used: The term "homosexual" is often used as a snarl word by religious and social conservatives; "gay" and "lesbian" often invoke a less emotional response. "Same-sex marriage" may have the least emotional response at all. If a pollster is interested in swaying the results, they may write the questions accordingly.

bulletTime of day: One method of getting an accurate survey is to phone in early evening, when persons who work are more likely to be at home. If a pollster wants to sway the results in a negative direction, all they have to do is to phone subjects during the daytime, when retired folks are probably home and people who work are probably out of the home.

horizontal rule

Conclusions:

By an almost 2 to 1 ratio, it appears that most American adults now favor making civil unions available to same-sex committed loving couples. Their numbers are increasing.

A minority continues to favor full marriage rights; they are also increasing in numbers.

This raises the question of whether a better strategy for homosexuals and bisexuals might have been to:

  1. Press for civil unions first -- i.e. legislation that would register their relationships and give them the full set of state benefits and protections that are given to opposite-sex married couples.

  2. Focus on changing the federal DOMA legislation to in order that loving, committed same-sex couples could obtain the 1,050 or so benefits and protections given by the federal government to married opposite-sex couples.

  3. Only when this second goal is attained, attempt to obtain access to full marriage on a state-by-state basis.

This strategy might have been more successful in attaining their goal of marriage equality sooner.

Meanwhile, by a small but growing margin, older youths and young adults now favor enlarging the definition of marriage to include both same-sex and opposite couples. We suspect that these trends are based on the belief by a growing number of American adults that a homosexual orientation is morally equivalent to a heterosexual orientation for a minority of humans. They view both orientations as beyond the control of the individual, as unchosen and unchangeable.

Opposition to homosexual behavior generally and same-sex marriages and civil unions in particular is still very high among fundamentalists and other evangelicals.

One might expect that Roman Catholics would reject SSM and civil unions in large numbers because of their church's unalterable opposition to both. However, at least among Catholic graduating high school students, support of SSM by individual Catholics is much higher than the general population.

Fundamentalists and other evangelicals remain the main organized resistance to change. If present trends continue, then most Americans will no longer view homosexuality as a problem. They will view homophobia 3 -- opposition to equal rights for gays, lesbians, bisexuals and SSM -- as the real problem. They will consider opposition to the recognition of same sex partnerships as one form of homophobia. Conservative Christians would then be faced with a difficult choice in future decades:

bulletWhether to continue political action to deny the right of gays and lesbian to marry or enter civil unions, and thus impede their main task which is to evangelize the world, or

bulletTo quietly back off on their activity against same-sex partnerships and allow gays and lesbians to achieve equal rights to opposite-sex couples.

horizontal rule

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1. Arian Campo-Flores, "A Gay Marriage Surge Public support grows, according to the new NEWSWEEK Poll," Newsweek, 2008-DEC-05, at: http://www.newsweek.com/
  2. "Newsweek Poll: Gay Marriage/President-Elect Obama," Newsweek, 2008-DEC-05, at: http://www.newsweek.com/ This is a PDF file.
  3. The term "homophobia" has a variety of definitions. This is the one that we use.

horizontal rule

Site navigation: Home page > "Hot" religious topics > Homosexuality > Polls > SSM-Civil union polls > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2001 TO 2010  by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally written: 2001-JUL-30
Latest update: 2010-JAN-21
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes) 
Sponsored link

horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or to the "SSM survey" menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

 

Sponsored link: