Sexual orientation as a protected class
Introduction

Sponsored link.

Overview:
Most governments in North America have created constitutions, laws, and
regulations to protect their citizens against hate-crimes, discrimination,
and oppression. They typically create protected classes of citizens based on such factors as race, sex, religion, skin color, degree of
ability/disability, age, etc. Sometimes sexual orientation is included.
The two types of legislation that are usually involved are:
 | Hate-crime legislation: They are activated only when a
perpetrator is convicted of a criminal act. If it can be proven that
they committed the murder, assault or other crime because of hatred towards all
individuals who share the
victim's race, sex, or religion, etc., then they are given an extended
sentence. |
 | Human rights legislation: These laws criminalize
discrimination against individuals because they are a member of a
protected class. They usually create a government office with which individuals
can file complaints. |
Religious groups are often given special treatment by
being exempt from human rights legislation and even some hate-crime laws. This enables them to
discriminate freely against gays, lesbians, and women in the acceptance of
members, eligibility for ordination, and appointment to other leadership
positions. This guarantees the special right under law for Roman Catholics,
Mormons, Muslims, conservative traditions in
Judaism,
etc. to refuse to consider any women for ordination, no matter what her talents,
personality, knowledge, training, etc. It also guarantees the right
of conservative Christian groups to refuse to consider homosexuals for
ordination. These are special rights not generally extended to secular organizations
and non-religious companies in some human rights legislation.
Public and governmental attitudes towards homosexuality have been in a
state of flux:
Change has been
passionately resisted recently, mainly by social and religious conservatives. This
conflict is based upon a deep division among adults in North America
concerning their beliefs about homosexuality:
 | Is homosexuality defined by one's behavior, or by one's sexual
orientation? |
 | Is it normal and natural for a minority of humans, or intrinsically
abnormal and unnatural? |
 | Is it caused by genes, or the environment, or both? |
 | Is it fixed, or changeable? |
 | Is it chosen by the individual, or is it something that they discover? |
 | Is it intrinsically immoral, or as morally neutral as is
heterosexuality? |
 | etc. |
These fundamental, conflicting, beliefs lead naturally to a decision on
whether or not gays, lesbians and bisexuals should be considered as part of
a minority class protected against hate-crimes and discrimination in
employment, accommodation, etc. They also influence a person's attitude towasrds
same-sex marriage, adoption, etc.
Many advertising campaigns have been launched to prevent sexual orientation
from being added to federal, state, provincial, territorial and municipal legislation,
regulations and by-laws. They frequently contain factual errors. Among
the most common arguments are:
 | Including sexual orientation as a
protected class, grants "special rights" or privileges to gays, lesbians and bisexuals.
This is
factually incorrect because legislation protects every person without exception, whether
they be heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual or, sometimes, asexual.
|
 | Including sexual orientation will criminalize any religious speech that presents
homosexuality as a sin. This is factually incorrect, because:
 | In the U.S., speech attacking a minority group is protected by
the First Amendment of the Constitution.
Hate-crime legislation does not inhibit speech. It only is applicable if
a violent crime has first been committed -- e.g. attempted murder, assault,
aggravated assault, etc. |
 | In Canada, certain forms of hate speech are
criminalized by provisions of the Criminal Code of Canada.
But anyone delivering an anti-gay speech based on the famous six "clobber" passages in the Bible or similar
passages from the holy texts of other religions is immune from
prosecution. This immunity applies to clergy and to lay members of any religion.
However, incitement to genocide against any group, including homosexuals
and bisexuals, remains a crime in spite of efforts by some religious groups to
decriminalize it.
|
|
 | Including sexual orientation is a protected class is invalid because
such classes must be reserved for innate, unchangeable, unchosen factors in
a person's life, like race, skin color, sex, degree of permanent disability,
etc. This is not a defensible argument because religion has traditionally
been included in hate-crime and human rights legislation. One's faith
identification is certainly changeable and chosen. Also, according to the
vast majority of mental health therapists, human sexuality researchers, the
Roman Catholic Church, liberal faith groups and some mainline faith groups,
sexual orientation is neither changeable nor chosen. |

Site navigation:

Copyright © 2004 to 2009 by Ontario Consultants on
Religious Tolerance
Latest update: 2009-JUN-28
Author: B.A. Robinson

|