Every four years, a General Conference of Methodist churches from around the world is
held. Their Book of Discipline may be revised at that conference. 1
1972: They passed a motion which added the following statement to the
denomination's "Social Principles" document. This followed a four year
study into homosexuality:
"Homosexuals no less than heterosexuals are person of sacred worth, who need the
ministry and guidance of the church in their struggles for human fulfillment, as well as
the spiritual and emotional care of a fellowship which enables reconciling relationships
with God, with others, and with self. Further we insist that all persons are entitled to
have their human and civil rights ensured, although we do not condone the practice of
homosexuality and consider this practice incompatible with Christian teaching."
The final phrase "although...teaching" was added to the statement
after a floor debate. This motion has since been reaffirmed in subsequent conferences. In 1992,
it was passed again with a vote of 75% in favor.
1976: They adopted reports which stopped any funding of gay/lesbian support
groups with church money. 2
1980: A motion was proposed to add the phrase "no
self-avowed practicing homosexual therefore shall be ordained or appointed in The United
Methodist Church" to Paragraph 404 of the Book. It failed to pass.
1984: They passed a "fidelity in marriage and celibacy in
singleness" statement (Paragraph 402.2) which stated:
"Since the practice of homosexuality is incompatible with Christian teaching,
self-avowed practicing homosexuals are not to be accepted as candidates, ordained as
ministers, or appointed to serve in The United Methodist Church."
Shortly after the UMC statement, the New York Conference passed a resolution stating:
"We deeply regret our denomination's continued oppression of homosexual persons ...
We look forward to the day when the church will accept gay and lesbian persons into full
fellowship."
1988: The Conference created a "Committee to Study Homosexuality"
to present a report to the General Council on Ministries. They established a list
of categories for committee membership, in order that it be truly inclusive. In a curious
move, gays, lesbians and bisexuals were not allowed to join the committee.
1992: The (presumably 100% heterosexual) committee was able to reach a consensus on
four
items:
The 7 references to homosexuality in the Bible represent
ancient culture and not the will of God. They cannot be taken as definitive.
Homosexuality is a normal human sexual variant, which can be healthy and whole.
Covenantal, committed, and monogamous homosexual relationships should be affirmed.
These conclusions are supported by God's grace, which is visible in the life of lesbian
and gay Christians.
A majority report recommended:
"The present state of knowledge and insight in the biblical, theological, ethical,
biological, psychological, and sociological fields does not provide a satisfactory basis
upon which the church can responsibly maintain the condemnation of all homosexual
practice."
A minority report recommended:
"The present state of knowledge and insight in the biblical, theological, ethical,
biological, psychological, and sociological fields does not provide a satisfactory basis
upon which the church can responsibly alter its previously held position that we do not
condone the practice of homosexuality and consider this practice incompatible with
Christian teaching.
The committee recommended that Paragraph 72 of the Social Principles be
augmented to include:
G) Rights of Homosexual Persons. Certain basic human rights and civil liberties are
due all persons. We are committed to support those rights and liberties for homosexual
persons. We see a clear issue of simple justice in protecting their rightful claims in
same-sex relationships where they have: shared material resources, pensions, guardian
relationships, mutual powers of attorney and other such lawful claims typically attendant
to contractual relationships which involve shared contributions, responsibilities, and
liabilities, and equal protection before the law. Moreover, we support efforts to stop
violence and other forms of coercion against gays and lesbians.
The homosexual report was "received" by the General Conference, but was
not approved. 3As a result, Appendix G was not augmented.
They did modify their Book of Discipline to state that
"we insist that all persons, regardless of age, gender, marital status or
sexual orientation, are entitled to have their human and civil rights ensured."
They further emphasized that Methodists "are committed to support [basic human
rights and civil liberties] for homosexual persons." It also recognizes that
claims of gays and lesbians to "equal protection before the law" is a
issue of simple justice.
Also in 1992, the UMC Commission on Christian Unity and Inter-religious Concerns
opened its membership to all members, including gays and lesbians. The UMC Judicial
Council later ruled that the Commission's action was constitutional.
This essay continues below.
Click below to visit one of our sponsors:
1996: The 1996 General Conference was held during the week of APR-15.
They voted 553 to 321 to add to the Book of Discipline's "Social Principles"
section a statement saying "Ceremonies that celebrate homosexual unions shall not
be conducted by our ministers and shall not be conducted in our churches."
At the
conference, 11 active and 4 retired Bishops (out of the total of 130 bishops worldwide)
circulated a "In All Things Charity" letter calling for equal rights for
homosexuals, including the right to be eligible for ordination as pastors. "Clergy
from across the United States added their names to the statement, which now [1998-JAN] has
been endorsed by approximately 1,300 United Methodist clergy."
4 The letter
reads, in part:
"We the undersigned bishops wish to affirm the commitment made at our consecration
to the vows to uphold the Discipline of the church. However, we must confess the pain we
feel over our personal convictions that are contradicted by the proscriptions in the
Discipline against gay and lesbian persons within our church and within our ordained and
diaconal ministers. Those sections are Paragraphs 71F (last paragraph); 402.2; 906.12; and
footnote, p. 205."
"We believe it is time to break the silence and state where we are on this issue
that is hurting and silencing countless faithful Christians. We will continue our
responsibility to order and discipline of the church but urge our United Methodist
churches to open the doors in gracious hospitality to all our brothers and sisters in the
faith."
This time, the vote on the "incompatibility" clause passed with only a 60%
majority.
On 1996-MAY-9, Transforming Congregations formally expressed concern
about the
statement of the 15 bishops. They feel that such a stance by liberal Bishops will
adversely "influence our ability to do transforming ministry with those who are
struggling and overcoming homosexual behavior and desire." They urged the Council
of Bishops to not "undermine our ministries through your words and actions."
The conference passed the following resolution about homosexuals in the military:
"Basis: The United States of America, a nation built on equal
rights, has denied the right of homosexuals to actively serve their country while being
honest about who they are. The United Methodist Church needs to be an advocate for equal
civil rights for all marginalized groups, including homosexuals.
Conclusion: The U.S. military should not exclude persons from
service solely on the basis of sexual orientation." (Book of Resolutions
. Page 112)
2000: The General Conference was held
from MAY-2 to 12 in Cleveland OH. Ironically, the conference theme
was: "We Who Are Many Are One Body." Attitudes towards equal rights for gays and lesbians seem to have
hardened. Two weeks previously, charges were laid against Melfin Talbert, a bishop in California. He said that policies in local
Methodist churches that foster "inclusiveness and justice"
take priority over national church law.
On MAY-8, a resolution was rejected 705 to 210 that would have
required a loyalty oath of any minister assigned to a congregation:
"I do not believe that homosexuality is God's perfect will for
any person. I will not practice it. I will not promote it. I will not
allow its promotion to be encouraged under my authority."
The delegates passed a resolution reaffirming their belief that homosexual
behavior is incompatible with Christian teaching (the vote was 628 to
337). A compromise proposal to replace this statement with one stating
that: "Many consider this practice incompatible with Christian
teaching. Others believe it acceptable when practiced in a context of
human covenantal faithfulness," was defeated 585 to 376. This
is a 61% majority. A demonstration in support of equal rights for gays
which had been peaceful, started singing the civil rights anthem
"We Shall Overcome," and marched onto the stage.
Randy Miller of San Francisco asked and was granted permission to
address the delegates. He said: "We have broken covenant
because this church has broken covenant with us. We were baptized in
this church, and grew up in your Sunday schools [only to be excluded
as gay and lesbian adults.] The covenant is already broken. We take it
as an act of conscience to be forcibly removed from here."
About 27 demonstrators were peacefully arrested, including two bishops
and at least three ministers. Some delegates and visitors chanted
"Shame! Shame!"
Two other resolutions were passed. These repeated decisions of
earlier conferences: that sexually active
gays and lesbians cannot be ordained (640-317), and that UMC ministers may not
conduct "ceremonies that celebrate homosexual union."
(646 - 294) This is a majority of 69%, compared with a majority of 63%
on a similar resolution at the 1996 convention. A proposal to
modify the language so that violations would not be prosecuted was
rejected. 5
Rev. Mel White, director of Soulforce
an ecumenical
gay-straight alliance said: "We think the Holy Spirit has left
the United Methodist Church as a denomination. God is for justice, and
when you exclude people from a congregation, God goes out the door
with the outcasts."
Some UMC members are suggesting a schism in the denomination. Rev.
James Heidenger, editor of the conservative Good News magazine
commented: "Is an amicable departure a better option than
continuing to tear away at the fabric of our denomination?...We are
pained at their pain, and we don't want to be unloving in our
response. But I'm not sure I see a middle ground here."
2004: The General Conference was scheduled for APR-27
to MAY-7 in Pittsburgh, PA.
The race question: On APR-30, the delegates to the
Conference noted that African-Americans "were part of the church
when Methodism began, but often have been denied full participation
because of racism....Delegates confessed to the sin of racism in the
denomination." Bishop Charlene Kammerer of Charlotte NC
delivered a sermon which thanked the generations of black Methodists
who stayed in an institution that excluded them. "For all those
faithful, courageous black Methodists who stayed in an inhospitable
place and abusive church, we say 'Thank you, God.' Those of us in
the white majority confess that we have sinned against you and
against God who made us all one family. We have excluded you from
our sanctuaries, schools, colleges, our public domains, our
neighborhoods, our homes and, worst of all, our hearts. For that, we
are truly sorry." 6
If current trends continue and an increasing percentage of the
public accepts homosexuality as a normal and natural sexual
orientation, it is likely that similar apologies will appear in a
future Conference, directed to gays and lesbians.
Acceptance of homosexuality:
One representative each from the South Carolina and Mississippi
Annual Conferences submitted a petition to prohibit the funding of
any group which promotes the acceptance of homosexuality. The
Financial Administration committee voted to recommend the petition
by a very narrow margin: 37 for, 36 against, 21 abstentions. The
petition added a new section 19 to the existing paragraph 611
of the 2000 Book of Discipline: "19. To ensure that no
annual conference board, agency, committee, commission, or council
shall give United Methodist funds to any gay caucus or group, or
otherwise use such funds to promote the acceptance of
homosexuality. The council shall have the right to stop such
expenditures. This restriction shall not limit the Church's
ministry in response to the HIV epidemic, nor shall it preclude
funding for dialogs or educational events where the Church's
official position is fairly and equally represented." On
2004-MAY-01, delegates voted in favor of the petition by 497 to 418.
7
2006:TheMinnesota Annual Conference of
the United Methodist Church passed nine petitions related to
homosexuality. Victoria Rebeck, communications director for the
Conference said: "The biggest news is that we had a good, respectful
discussion of these very emotional issues and people really listened to
each other." The closest vote was a real squeaker: 358 to 356. It
involved a petition to change the definition of marriage from "a man
and a woman" to "two adult persons," and to delete a sentence
supporting laws that define marriage as between a man and woman. The
resolutions will be passed on to the 2008 General Conference.
Reactions:
Bishop Sally Dyck said that delegates approached the issues "as
Christians in the best sense of that word - loving and humble,
trying to be careful with each other."
The Rev. Carl Caskey of Northfield, said, "We think the
future is with us [in the push for greater acceptance of gays
and lesbians]. Many of us are greatly concerned about the
direction the (denomination) has taken toward exclusion. We'll keep
putting the pressure on."
The Rev. Phil Strom of Elk River United Methodist Church who
believes that homosexual behavior is inherently sinful said
that both sides "feel grief and sadness, because the vote reminds
us of how deep this division is, how irreconcilable."
The Rev. Dan Johnson of Good Samaritan United Methodist Church
in Edina said, "The half-dozen biblical references to
homosexuality do not reflect what we understand today about loving
relationships. This is an identity, not a sin."
The Rev. Daren Flinck of Grace United Methodist in Fergus Falls
said he "suddenly feels like an alien in my own land." 8