The Episcopal Church, USA and homosexuality
The 2006 General Convention: Part 3
Subsequent reactions to B033. Other resolutions.

Sponsored link.

This essay is a continuation from Part 2

Subsequent reactions to B033:
ENS reported:
 | Bishop Dorsey Henderson of Upper South
Carolina, co-chair of the Special Committee on the Episcopal Church and
the Anglican Communion, said that the resolution was: |
"...an appropriate and blessed way forward, strengthening the
Episcopal Church, strengthening the Anglican Communion, without closing
any doors unnecessarily."
 | Bishop Geralyn Wolf of Rhode Island, a member of the committee, said it
is: |
"...the best that we can do. It's a relief to me
because my hope is that we can stay in communion and continue the
conversation and affirm the Windsor process. Having this vote in both
houses says to the Anglican Communion that we are very serious about our
relationship."
 | Bishop Gene Robinson of New Hampshire expressed some disappointment: |
"The church has a picture of the wide diversity in this church and
people have been remarkably honest and loving in all of this. I have
been approached by all kinds of people who have felt called to vote for
this resolution in order for us to continue the conversation with the
Anglican Communion...In some sense, having given the Anglican Communion
what it asked for regarding gay and lesbian members of this church,
we'll be looking to them to see if they were serious about wanting to be
in conversation about this, or whether they wanted this to end the
conversation...This is not what we hoped for, but it's what we have, so
I'm much more interested in talking about tomorrow than I am about today
or yesterday."
 | The Rev. Canon David Anderson, president of the American Anglican
Council, a conservative activist group, said: |
"I don't think there's the willingness to actually enforce it and
carry it out. The best prediction of what a person will do is what they
have done before, and a number of the very revisionist bishops have very
honestly said, 'We've been doing same-sex blessings, we've been
ordaining homosexual persons and we're going to keep right on doing
that.' ...I applaud them for their honesty, although I disagree with
them."
 | The Rev. Susan Russell, president of Integrity, a gay-positive activist
group said: |
"I am disappointed that whether or not we go to Lambeth matters more
than the lives of gay and lesbian people, and their vocations in this
church. At the same time I understand this to be a part of a process. We
are on a journey. It is part of an ongoing conversation."
She noted that the General Convention has:
"done nothing about genocide, about evangelism, about the
environment, about economics, about all those other hundreds of
resolutions that are now going to fall into the abyss because this house
has not been able to pull itself up and take some action."
 | Katherine Tyler Scott, a deputy and member of the standing committee in
the Diocese of Indianapolis, said she had been blessed to work with very
diverse people: |
"listening to one another, respecting each other, really hearing and
coming to what we thought was a common mind on these issues."
 |
More than 60 international visitors attended the General Convention. One
was Bishop Mano Rumalshah of Peshawar in Pakistan. He said that the
resolution: |
"...could have been much more but at least it keeps the door open and
allows the dialogue to continue and let's rejoice in that. Let's not
give up. Let's not draw the lines too hard. Let's continue to have hope
in humanity and each other and in God's spirit that, yes, things can go
on." 1
The American Anglican Council (AAC)
took a distinctly negative view towards the Convention. AAC CEO and president,
the Rev. Canon David C. Anderson wrote:
"The worldwide Communion asked for simple, unambiguous compliance with
the Windsor Report, specifically an expression of regret for decisions made
in 2003 and subsequent actions, as well as moratoria on consecrations of
non-celibate homosexuals and same-sex blessings. The Episcopal Church did
not deliver. Instead, both the House of Bishops and House of Deputies bowed
to intense pressure from the Presiding Bishop to pass B033, a resolution
characterized by ill-defined language with no provision for enforcement or
accountability. The legislation 'called upon' standing committees and
diocesan bishops to 'exercise restraint' by not consenting to the election
of individuals whose 'manner of life presents a challenge to the wider
church.' Why was this legislation not cast in Windsor language? It was clear
that neither house would have approved Windsor compliance wording...."
"...the Episcopal Church simply refused to address the matter of same-sex
blessings. Dodging the issue with a claim that ECUSA has not authorized
official rites, General Convention ignored the fact that same-sex blessings
are occurring on a regular basis all around the country, performed in
churches by Episcopal clergy and bishops. In addition, numerous dioceses
have developed, or are in the process of developing, rites of same-sex
blessings."
The Archbishop of Canterbury issued a brief comment, stating that the
Anglican Communion will have to carefully review the Convention's decisions.
Primates of the Council of Anglican Provinces of Africa (CAPA) issued
an open letter stating:
"...reports to date of your elections and actions suggest that you are
unable to embrace the essential recommendations of the Windsor Report and
the 2005 Primates Communiqué necessary for the healing of our
divisions....We assure all those Scripturally faithful dioceses and
congregations alienated and marginalised within your Provincial structure
that we have heard their cries."
Global South primates are scheduled to meet during 2006-SEP to offer their
"concerted pastoral and structural response."

Other resolutions:
On matters relating to human sexuality, ENS reports:
"Deputies concurred with the House of Bishops in opposing the
criminalization of homosexuality, opposing state or federal constitutional
amendments that prohibits same-gender civil marriage or civil unions and
affirming the civil rights of gays and lesbians."
"Another resolution reiterates Episcopal Church support of gay and
lesbian people as 'children of God who have a full and equal claim with all
other persons upon the love, acceptance, and pastoral concern and care of
the Church'."
"Deputies also concurred with bishops in adopting a resolution calling
for equal representation of women and men on all decision-making bodies
within the church at local, diocesan and national levels. This
recommendation originated with the 2005 meeting of the Anglican Consultative
Council...."
"Additional resolutions were passed that came from the special committee
that considered resolutions in response to the Windsor Report. They
reiterated the historic separate and independent status of the churches of
the Anglican Communion and affirmed the 'Windsor process' to discern the
nature and unity of the church and the report's call for a listening
process."
[The House of Deputies] "approved for trial use new liturgies concerning
rites of passage, including reaching puberty, earning a driver's license and
dating relationships (A067). 2

References:
The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above
essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.
- Matthew Davies, "From
Columbus: Major Windsor action draws mixed reactions," Episcopal News
Service, 2006-JUN-21, at: http://www.episcopalchurch.org/
- Melodie Woerman & Jim DeLa, "From Columbus: Deputies finish work with
rapid agenda," Episcopal News Service, 2006-JUN-21, at: http://www.episcopalchurch.org/
- George Byron Koch, "Future of the Episcopal Church and Church of the
Resurrection, West Chicago," 2006-JUN-29, at: http://www.resurrection.org/

Site navigation:

Copyright © 2005 & 2006 by Ontario Consultants on
Religious Tolerance
Latest update: 2011-JUN-11
Author: B.A. Robinson

Sponsored link

|