About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Your first visit?
Contact us
External links
Good books
Visitor essays
Our forum
New essays
Other site features
Buy a CD
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
.
CHRISTIANITY
Who is a Christian?
Shared beliefs
Handle change
Bible topics
Bible inerrancy
Bible harmony
Interpret Bible
Persons
Beliefs, creeds
Da Vinci code
Revelation, 666
Denominations
.
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Other spirituality
Cults and NRMs
Comparing religions

About all religions
Important topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handle change
Doubt/security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
World's end
One true religion?
Seasonal topics
Science v. Religion
More info.

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality/ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten commandm'ts
Abortion
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment
Equal rights - gays & bi's
Gay marriage
Nudism
Origins of the species
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking kids
Stem cells
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

Web site logo

Same-sex marriages and civil unions in Hawaii

Proposed legalization of civil unions

horizontal rule

Click Here to Visit our Sponsors.

horizontal rule

As of early 2007, Hawaii has a reciprocal benefits law that grants certain rights to registered same-sex couples in the areas of insurance, property ownership, pensions, and hospital visitation. However, there are hundreds of benefits, rights and obligations automatically given to opposite-sex marriage couples that are not extended to same-sex couples.

Democratic legislators hold control of both the state House and Senate in Hawaii. One of their highest priority projects in 2007 is a bill to create civil unions for same sex couples. If passed, Hawaii would become the fifth state to recognize same-sex marriage, civil unions or registered partnerships. Same-sex couples would enjoy all of the benefits of opposite-sex married couples, except for the legal use of the term "marriage."

Gary Hooser, (D) the state senate majority leader said:

"Committed couples, regardless of their sexual preference or orientation, should have the same rights. That's the bottom line — we should treat people equally. ... There's broad support among Democratic party members."

horizontal rule

Reaction to the proposed law:

bulletGovernor Linda Lingle will not take a position on the bill until after the Legislature passes it. Her senior policy adviser, Linda Smith, said: "We'll give every bill a fair look if and when it comes to her desk."
bulletKelly Rosati, spokesperson for the Roman Catholic Church, said that the church opposes the idea of civil unions.
bulletA spokesperson for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints said that she was unaware of any official involvement by the Mormons in the civil union debate.
bulletCovenant News, a fundamentalist Christian news group referred to same-sex civil unions as "sodomite 'unions' " in their blog. 2 In a particularly nasty show of prejudice against same-sex couples. We feel that it is worth duplicating here, in order to show the depths of hatred that some religious conservatives have towards persons of bisexual or homosexual orientation. Covenant News commented in their daily mailing that Hawaiian legislators were considering:

"...a 'renewed push' to give sex offenders marriage benefits through 'civil unions.' Reprobate lawmakers hold an overwhelming majorities [sic] in both the state House and Senate and are supporting a proposed 'civil union bill" as a top priority for this year's legislative session. If the sodomite bill passes, Hawaii would become the fifth state to make a man's wife equal to a filthy sodomite." 3

Covenant News appears to consider lawmakers who favor equal rights to be reprobates. They refer to homosexuals by the derogatory term "sodomite." They imply that all homosexuals are "filthy." and "sexual offenders." Finally, they suggest that same-sex "civil unionized" couples would receive rights equal to married opposite-sex couples. That is wrong on two counts:

bulletThey would only receive a few hundred state benefits. The over 1,000 federal rights and benefits enjoyed by every opposite-sex married couple in Hawaii would be denied them.
bulletTheir rights and privileges are not generally transferable if they moved to another state. Unless they happened to move to a state that recognized civil unions made in other states, they would be treated as simple roommates at their new location.

horizontal rule

Site navigation:

Home > Religious info. > Basic > Marriage > Same-sex marriage > HI > here

Home > "Hot" topics > Homosexuality > Same-sex marriage > HI > here

horizontal rule

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1. Mark Niesse, "Hawaii lawmakers mull civil unions bill," Associated Press, 2007-JAN-31, at: http://news.yahoo.com/

  2. "Hawaii lawmakers mull sodomite 'unions'," Covenant News, Abominations section, 2007-JAN-31, at: http://www.aboms.com/

  3. Covenant News mailing, 2007-JAN-31.

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2007 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally written: 2007-FEB-04
Latest update: 2007-FEB-05
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)

horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or return to the "Hawaiian same-sex couples" menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org
Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?