Twitter icon

Facebook icon

About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD of this site
Vital notes

World religions
-Christian definition
 -Shared beliefs
 -Handling change
 -Bible topics
 -Bible inerrancy
 -Bible harmony
 -Interpret the Bible
 -Beliefs & creeds
 -Da Vinci code
 -Revelation, 666
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Confusing terms
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Death penalty

Same-sex marriage

Human rights
Gays in the military
Sex & gender
Stem cells
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news



Religious Tolerance logo

Same sex marriage (SSM), civil unions, & domestic partnerships


In North Carolina

horizontal rule

2014-MAY-01: The status of SSM and Civil Unions in North Carolina:

As of this date, neither civil unions nor same-sex marriages are available to residents of North Carolina. The situation in this state is particularly interesting because no majority opinion exists:

  • A large minority of voters would like to see same-sex marriages (SSMs) legalized.

  • A large minority of voters favors the introduction of civil unions or domestic partnerships for loving committed same-sex couples. This would give them and their children the same state benefits and protections enjoyed by opposite-sex married couples, but without the right to call their relationship a marriage. To many same-sex couples, to have their relationship recognized as a marriage is the most important benefit.

  • A large minority of voters favors the existing system where the relationships of same-sex couples are not recognized by the state. They are regarded as "legal strangers" -- simple roommates or housemates with few protections for themselves and their children.

This is every politician's nightmare. No matter what move they make, they will generate a lot of animosity on the part of most voters. Even making no move generates animosity among many.

A majority of voters favor recognition of the relationships of loving, committed same-sex couples in some fashion -- either by legalizing same-sex marriage or by creating a system of civil unions. Only a minority favors the present system. Many religious and social conservatives remained dedicated to preserving the status quo by changing the constitution to prevent the legislature or the state courts from recognizing same-sex relationships in any way. Some describe this position as motivated by simple animus towards the lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) community. However many persons who are opposed to recognition of same-sex relationships sincerly believe that:

  • Everyone is born a heterosexual.
  • Some people choose later in life to become homosexual or bisexual.
  • Many of them become addicted to the lifestyle.
  • Through a major effort involving prayer and counseling, all can return to being heterosexual.
  • By government recognition of -- and protections for -- the relationships of LGBs', they are less likely to make the effort to be converted back to heterosexuality.
  • After death, sexually active homosexuals will spend eternity in the torture chambers of Hell.
  • By opposing same-sex marriage and civil unions, religious and social conservatives feel that they are expressing love and caring towards the LGB community.

A large majority of LGBs, religious and social liberals, therapists and counselors, human sexuality researchers, etc. strongly deny the validity of the first six beliefs.

Most religious and social conservatives want loving, committed couples to be treated as "legal strangers" -- as simple roomates. They added Amendment One to the state Constitution to ban SSMs, domestic partnerships, and civil unions. However, the sponsors of the amendment realized that it would be turned down by the voters if the latter became totally aware of its scope. Thus it it was promoted as a simple prohibition of SSM in the hopes that voters would not notice the wide scope of the amendment.

The promoters of Amendment One were successful. The people of North Carolina did not realize that this was a stealth amendment. It passed on 2012-MAY-08 with about a 61% vote in favor.

The result is a major controversy.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.

horizontal rule

2014-OCT-05: The status of SSM and Civil Unions in North Carolina:

In North America:

  • Same-sex couples have been able to marry in all ten provinces and three territories in Canada since mid-2005.
  • The are able to marry in 19 states in the U.S. and the District of Columbia

There are about 70 active lawsuits in federal District Courts seeking permission by same-sex couples to marry. They typically involve one or more same-sex couples who are seeking to marry:

  • In one of the 31 states where marriage is currently unavailable to them, or

  • In another state where marriage is available, return to their home state, and have their new marriage recognized.

However, North Carolina is an exception to the above. On 2014-APR-26, the United Church of Christ filed a lawsuit seeking to have Amendment One declared unconstitutional. They argue that the current law makes it a crime for a member of their clergy to solemnize the marriage of a same-sex couple. This would appear to be an obvious violation of the principle of separation of church and state as required by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link:

horizontal rule

Topics covered in this section:

2004 to 2011: Earlier developments:

2012-APR/MAY: Earlier developments: Passage of the NC Amendment One: to prohibit same-sex marriages (SSM), all types of civil unions, etc.

2012 to 2014: Amendment One (Cont'd). United Church files lawsuit

2014: United Church lawsit (Cont'd)

Site navigation

    Home > Religious info. > Basic > Marriage > SSM > Menu >here

    Home > "Hot" topics > Homosexuality > SSM > Menu > here

    First posted: 2011-AUG-31
    Latest update: 2014-OCT-13
    Author: B.A. Robinson

    line.gif (538 bytes)
    Sponsored link

    Go to the previous page, or return to the Same-sex Marriage menu, or choose:


        Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

        E-mail us about errors, etc.  Hot, controversial topics

        FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

        Twitter link

        Facebook icon

        Google Page Translator:

        This page translator works on Firefox,
        Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

        After translating, click on the "show
        original" button at the top of this
        page to restore page to English.

Sponsored links: