Quantcast
About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Your first visit?
Contact us
External links
Good books
Visitor essays
Our forum
New essays
Other site features
Buy a CD
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
.
CHRISTIANITY
Who is a Christian?
Shared beliefs
Handle change
Bible topics
Bible inerrancy
Bible harmony
Interpret Bible
Persons
Beliefs, creeds
Da Vinci code
Revelation, 666
Denominations
.
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Other spirituality
Cults and NRMs
Comparing religions

About all religions
Important topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handle change
Doubt/security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
World's end
One true religion?
Seasonal topics
Science v. Religion
More info.

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality/ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten commandm'ts
Abortion
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment
Equal rights - gays & bi's
Gay marriage
Nudism
Origins of the species
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking kids
Stem cells
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

 

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

Same-sex marriage (SSM) in Canada

The rights of clergy and others to refuse
services to same-sex engaged couples

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.


horizontal rule

Overview:

Many religious conservatives are concerned about same-sex marriage in two main ways:

bulletThey reject marriage equality -- the current system in Canada in which all loving committed couples can marry, whether they are of the opposite sex or the same sex -- subject to age and consanguinity considerations. Many Conservatives prefer a return to what they refer to as "traditional marriage" in which couples are prohibited from marrying same-sex partners. They feel that men and women have very strictly defined roles to play in the family, within faith groups, and in the rest of society.
bulletThey are also concerned about the adverse effects that SSM will have on some aspects of their religious freedom:
bulletThey are generally not concerned about the types of threats to religious freedom found elsewhere in the world, including:
bulletVery serious government oppression of individuals because of their religious beliefs or practices.
bulletMurder, mass murder and genocide of religious minorities.
bulletLoss of freedom of assembly by religious groups.
bulletClergy being restricted from teaching the beliefs of their faith group.
bulletetc.
bulletRather, their concern is very specific. They currently have the freedom to discriminate against gays and lesbians, and they want to retain that freedom by:
bulletRefusing to marry same-sex couples with a valid marriage license.
bulletTeaching in their religious schools that homosexuality is chosen, abnormal, unnatural, changeable sexual practice that is hated by God.
bulletVerbally attacking sexually active gays and lesbians in sermons, church pamphlets, etc.
bulletRefusing to ordain candidates for the ministry who are in loving, committed same-sex relationships.
bulletRefusing to hire staff with homosexual or bisexual sexual orientations.
bulletRefusing membership in the church to individuals in same-sex relationships.
bulletetc.

Some religious conservatives are concerned that future lawsuits will be filed against them under Canada's hate propaganda laws and/or provincial human rights commission regulations. They are also concerned that future decades will see the culture will evolve towards a consensus that homophobia is a social evil on a par with sexism, racism, and religism (hatred of other religions).

This essay discusses the second of their concerns: the freedom of religious leaders to continue to discriminate.

horizontal rule

The original draft SSM legislation & Supreme Court reference:

On 2003-JUL-17, the federal government released draft legislation to grant marriage equality to same-sex couples. It included a clause to protect clergy who refused to perform SSMs for religious reasons. The text contained two mentions of SSM:

bullet"WHEREAS everyone has the freedom of conscience and religion under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and officials of religious groups are free to refuse to perform marriages that are not in accordance with their religious beliefs."
bullet"Nothing in this Act affects the freedom of officials of religious groups to refuse to perform marriages that are not in accordance with their religious beliefs." 2

The legislation was sent as a "reference" to the Supreme Court of Canada on 2003-JUL-17. The government asked the court for a non-binding ruling on three questions -- later increased to four. The third question was:

"Does the freedom of religion guaranteed by paragraph 2(a) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protect religious officials from being compelled to perform a marriage between two persons of the same sex that is contrary to their religious beliefs?" 1

horizontal rule

The Supreme Court's reply to the reference questions:

Over 16 months later, on 2004-DEC-09, the Supreme Court of Canada answered the reference questions. The court stated that The Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantee that clergy and faith groups are free to continue their discrimination against same-sex couples . They wrote:

"The Proposed Act is limited in its effect to marriage for civil purposes:  see s. 1.  It cannot be interpreted as affecting religious marriage or its solemnization. ..."

"Absent state compulsion on religious officials, this conjecture does not engage the Charter.  If a promulgated statute were to enact compulsion, we conclude that such compulsion would almost certainly run afoul of the Charter guarantee of freedom of religion, given the expansive protection afforded to religion by s. 2(a) of the Charter. ..."

"The right to freedom of religion enshrined in s. 2(a) of the Charter encompasses the right to believe and entertain the religious beliefs of one’s choice, the right to declare one’s religious beliefs openly and the right to manifest religious belief by worship, teaching, dissemination and religious practice. ... The performance of religious rites is a fundamental aspect of religious  practice. 

"... concerns were raised about the compulsory use of sacred places for the celebration of such marriages and about being compelled to otherwise assist in the celebration of same-sex marriages.  The reasoning that leads us to conclude that the guarantee of freedom of religion protects against the compulsory celebration of same-sex marriages, suggests that the same would hold for these concerns. 

"... absent unique circumstances with respect to which we will not speculate, the guarantee of religious freedom in s. 2(a) of the Charter is broad enough to protect religious officials from being compelled by the state to perform civil or religious same-sex marriages that are contrary to their religious beliefs." 3

Douglas Elliot, a lawyer who represented the gay-positive Metropolitan Community Church of Toronto commented on the court's response. He said:

"They have said that the government cannot compel religious officials to marry same-sex couples against their religious beliefs...This is the concern, the bogeyman, that has been trotted out by our opponents. ... The Supreme Court of Canada has said in the strongest possible terms that the court will extend its protection to religious groups that don't agree with us. Catholics, Orthodox Jews and others who do not want to marry same sex couples have the constitutional right not to marry them." 4,5

horizontal rule

The final law C-38:

The Civil Marriage Act was proclaimed as law on 2005-JUL-20. The key parts regarding religious freedom to discriminate are contained in Section 3:

3. It is recognized that officials of religious groups are free to refuse to perform marriages that are not in accordance with their religious beliefs.

3.1 For greater certainty, no person or organization shall be deprived of any benefit, or be subject to any obligation or sanction, under any law of the Parliament of Canada solely by reason of their exercise, in respect of marriage between persons of the same-sex, of the freedom of conscience and religion guaranteed under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or the expression of their beliefs in respect of marriage as the union of a man and woman to the exclusion of all others based on that guaranteed freedom.

4. For greater certainty, a marriage is not void or voidable by reason only that the spouses are of the same-sex.

It is important to realize that Section 3.1 refers only to federal law; it is up to the individual provinces and territories to pass laws protecting persons subject to provincial law. It is the provinces that establish the systems to register persons authorized to perform marriages, to register the marriages, etc.

horizontal rule

The right of religious institutions to discriminate outside their sacred space:

The Supreme Court did confirm that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canada's constitution, offers clergy broad protection on religious freedom. This includes the right of clergy to continue to discriminate, for any reason, against any couple who requests a marriage ceremony without risking prosecution under Canada's anti-discrimination laws. In the past, clergy have discriminated against engaged couples on the basis of disability, sex, race, religion, level of  maturity and degree of commitment. They will be able to safely continue this in the future as they wish.

The court did state that a church could freely discriminate on any basis by refusing to allow its "sacred space" to be used for marriages. However, they do not seem to have ruled on a situation in which a same-sex couple approached the church to rent a church hall, or use a religious campground or other property owned by the faith group, to be married by a chaplain or member of the clergy who had no problem with same-sex marriages.

This situation arose in British Columbia before a human rights tribunal in late 2005. The local branch of the Knights of Columbus, a Roman Catholic group, unilaterally cancelled an existing contract for the rental of a church hall owned by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Vancouver. Their reason was that the couple who wanted to use the hall to get married were both female. Canadians for Equal Marriage commented:

In the Knights of Columbus case, the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal ruled that even quasi-religious organizations like the Knights are protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and do not have to rent their halls for weddings or receptions of same-sex couples. Because the Knights agreed to rent the hall, signed a contract to that effect, and then cancelled the contract after the couple had gone ahead with their plans, they were fined for treating the couple unfairly. However, the precedent is clear – the Knights’ policy not to rent to same-sex couples is legal. So this is a case of freedom of religion trumping equality, not the other way around.  6 More details

horizontal rule

Cases involving marriage commissioners:

 

horizontal rule

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1.   Mike Murphy, "Minister of Justice announces reference to the Supreme Court of Canada," Office of the Minister of Justice, 2003-JUL-17, at: http://www.justicecanada.ca/
  2. "Fact Sheet: Reference to the Supreme Court of Canada on Civil Marriage and the Legal Recognition of Same-sex Unions," Department of Justice, Canada, at: http://www.canada.justice.gc.ca/
  3. Supreme Court of Canada, "Reference re Same-Sex Marriage, 2004 SCC 79, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 698," 2004-DEC-19, Sections 55 to 60, at: http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/
  4. "INDEPTH: SAME-SEX RIGHTS: The Supreme Court decision," CBC News Online, 2004-DEC-09, at: http://www.cbc.ca/
  5. "Critics say institution hijacked; gay marriage advocates see 'green light'," Canoe.ca, 2004-DEC-09. at: http://cnews.canoe.ca/
  6. "Harper divides and delays ... again," Canadians for Equal Marriage, 2006-OCT-04, at: http://www.equal-marriage.ca/

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2006 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Latest update: 2006-OCT-30
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)


horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, to the marriage menu, to the same-sex marriage menu, or  choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?


Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.