Additional Info

Twitter icon

Facebook icon

About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD of this site
Vital notes

World religions
Christian def'n
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
Interpret the Bible
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Confusing terms
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Death penalty

Same-sex marriage

Human rights
Gays in the military
Sex & gender
Stem cells
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news



Religious Tolerance logo

An essay donated by Susan Humphreys

2013-JUL: Pope Francis' comments on homosexuality

Sponsored link

"Judge not that ye be not judged."

From the news reports it seems that Pope Francis shocked many reporters on the plane on his return flight to Rome from his trip to Brazil. Reporters seem to me are trying to read more into the Popeā€™s words than are there. They seem to be making "much ado about nothing"!

In essence the Pope said that he loves homosexuals they are also Godā€™s children and that it isnā€™t for him to judge.

"Love the sinner, hate the sin" is standard fundamentalist Christian terminology.

'It isnā€™t for me to judge" is also a fundamentalist Christian phrase.

There is nothing new or surprising for either statement to come from this Pope. There is nothing that signals a change in attitude from the Vatican.

I had one fundamentalist Christian say to me that "he wasnā€™t judging homosexuals, God was." I suspect the Pope if he was honest with reporters and challenged on it, he would have made a similar comment.

HOWEVER! It seems to me that determining that homosexual acts are sins is being judgmental. The Bible passages that mention same-gender sexual behavior refer to abusive and exploitative sexual practices NOT to loving consensual sexual practices.

The Bible never tells anyone they are to deny homosexuals their legal rights. The Bible never tells anyone that marriage is ONLY between one man and one woman for the purpose of procreation. Deciding the Bible says these things is being judgmental.

As for the Pope deciding that he wonā€™t address the issue of errors made by his predecessors, that is also being judgmental. OR to be more precise to admit that his predecessors made errors, that their words and actions were their own words and actions NOT the words and actions of an infallible and perfect God is being judgmental.

Sometimes life puts us into a position where judgment calls should be and must be made. That is the only way to acknowledge past wrongs in order to make the changes needed to right them. That is the only way to keep wrongs from happening. To decide not to judge is making a judgment. To fail to make the call when one should is a weakness in oneā€™s character.

Too be honest the whole "judge the sin not the sinner" phrase seems plain hoaky -- a piece of self-righteous double speak. Are there sins running loose out there without any causative agent? Do murders just happen or is there a person holding the gun and pulling the trigger? Does this terminology attempt to release individuals from taking responsibility for their actions? Can someone be a murderer without committing the act? Can someone be a homosexual and not commit a homosexual act? Well sure they can remain celibate for life as the reasoning goes, because to have a loving consensual relationship with a same sex partner is regarded as BAD, a SIN.

Can Popes make BAD judgment calls and not be BAD people? That is really what it all boils down to. If you condemn others for their "Bad" judgment calls how can you not condemn the Popes for theirs? Yet folks do condemn the homosexual (even when they claim they arenā€™t being judgmental) by denying them their legal rights including their right to marry the person that they love and to whom they are committed. Often homosexual acts are declared to be worse than adulterous acts, for example. Yet they donā€™t demand that adulterers be denied their legal right to marry.

Iā€™m not being judgmental or anything, but the Bible tells us that we arenā€™t to bear false witness. Bearing false witness is not just about spreading outright lies and misinformation about others it is also about not being honest about oneā€™s own actions. It seems that is what the Pope is doing, bearing false witness with misleading remarks about his own actions, claiming he isnā€™t being judgmental when he is and thus excusing his action for not being judgmental when he should be. But hey judge the sin not the sinner!

horizontal rule

Originally written: 2013-JUL-31
Latest update: 2013-AUG-02
Author: Susan Humphreys

line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

Go tothe previous page, or return to the "Catholic Church & homosexuality" menu, or to the "Visitors' essays" menu, or choose:


Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Twitter link

Facebook icon

GooglePage Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

Sponsored links