The Senate also approved a "Trinity" plate, proposed by Senator Gary Siplin
It may be interpreted in
various ways. Some might infer it as a promotion of cruel and unusual punishment
of extra-terrestrial beings with blue skins. Others might interpret it as
promoting the death penalty, or as endorsing sadomasochistic activities.
The plate has the name of the state and its motto, but no other identifying text
that might have explained the significance of the image. Still, most would
probably interpret the image as referring to the corpse of Yeshua of Nazareth
(a.k.a. Jesus Christ -- not his real name) having been executed by the occupying
Roman Army circa 30 CE.
The Trinity plate
It shows what appears to be a bald-headed, blue skinned male
with a short beard, wearing some form of headdress made of woven sticks.
At first glance, it might be assumed to represent the dead body
of Yeshua of
Nazareth. But this does not match the account in the Bible:
Yeshua was described in multiple locations of the Christian
Scriptures (a.k.a. New Testament) as a Jewish rabbi and an Orthodox Jew. Since
he followed the Mosaic Code, he would have had a long, untrimmed straggly
There is no record or tradition of him having a bald head.
It would be most unlikely that he had blue skin. The only
blue-skinned humans that I have seen are the men -- and the occasional woman --
who work for the three person Blue Man Group -- a musical band. However, the trio's skin
color is much darker and the performers appear to have no ears. So, one might
conclude that the plate shows an image of a non-human, perhaps an
Prior to execution Jesus was flogged to the degree that
his body would have been quite bloody. Yet no blood is shown on the image.
Jesus is recorded as having a crown of thorns pressed on his
head. That would have caused more blood to flow. Yet no blood is visible.
This second specialty plate design, is called a "Trinity" plate, although
there is no evidence of God or the Holy Spirit present. That might make
sense, because both the Holy Spirit and God are believed by most Christians --
with the exception of members of The Church of Jesus Christ of latter-Day
Saints (the Mormons) -- to be spirits, and thus invisible.
Americans United for Separation of Church and State (AU) sent
a letter to all Florida senators urging that they oppose Bill SB 642. The AU
argued that the bill would violate both the Establishment Clause and the Free
Speech Clause of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Relying on the
ruling in a U.S.
Supreme Court case, Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Doe (2000), they wrote:
"By creating Christian license plates, the state would send the
message to its own citizens that those who are non-Christian ??are outsiders,
not full members of the political community, and an accompanying message to
[Christians] that they are insiders, favored members of the political
The American Civil Liberties Union and the
Anti-Defamation League alsospoke out against the plate designs.
Debate in the Senate and media:
As noted above, the designs were offered by
Senators Ronda Storms (R) and Senator Gary Siplin (D). Many members of the
Senate had never seen the images prior to the vote on 2009-APR-24. None were
produced during the debate. Siplin simply stated: "It has a picture of my Lord
and savior Jesus Christ."
Revenue from the plates would be directed to the Toomey
Foundation for the Natural Scientists -- a group that promotes:
"... the acquisition, protection, and study of scientifically important land and
environmental resources. The primary focus of the endeavor shall be in the
fields of Archeology, Astronomy, Botany, Geology, and Paleontology."
their website contains quotations from the book of Psalms in the Hebrew
Scriptures, from a Roman Pagan philosopher, and a modern-day environmentalist. It contains
many references to the theory of evolution. 2
During the debate:
Sen. Ted Deutch, (D) said: "The issue is whether the state of
Florida ought to be producing license plates with religious images on them. I
don't believe that we should."
Other senators expressed concern that they were beingasked to approve plates that they had not been able to see.
Sen. Larcenia Bullard, D-Miami asked: "What if someone comes
next year and decides to vote on something that has the devil on it, and horns
... horns on each side. I know that people are called the devil, but if the
symbol of a devil is on it, I would not vote for that."
Sponsor Senator Siplin said that the Florida Agricultural and
Mechanical University has a snake on their specialty plate, and the University
of Miami "... has a duck or something on their license plate so I think we
should have an opportunity for every citizen around the state to be able to
purchase a license plate of their choice. ... If you don't like that particular
license plate, you're not forced to buy it."
It would seem that most of the Senators should have felt an
obligation to abstain from voting until they had a chance to actually view the
proposed plates. Perhaps many did because the Senate unsuccessfully held a voice vote,
a second voice vote, a voided roll call vote, and two quorum calls, before
finally holding a vote that counted. The plates were approved 22 to 13.
The Tallahassee Democrat newspaper opposed the sectarian plates, saying in
"Every vehicle on the road has many square yards of painted surface on which
owners are free to display spiritual messages and pictures of Jesus, whatever he
might have looked like. But that little square foot of state-supplied license
plate is no place for such a specifically religious message." 3
A St. Petersburg Times article about SB 642 received
many comments from readers.
Some of the more amusing were:
"Mike" wrote: "There is nothing wrong with that [plate design] - it does not
mention Jesus (and the person pictured doesn't look as if he's from the Middle
East) and there is nothing definitely religious about it. Gay men might quite
like it too."
"Susan" wrote: "Fine as long as I can have one promoting gay families."
"Tracy" wrote: "I am so ashamed to live here."
Glenn Church commented in "Foolocracy: government by fools, silliness and
"Am I the only one who finds it oddly coincidental that while the country
debates torture, Florida puts the image of the world?s most famous torture act on public property? Of course, torture
didn?t work then. It gave birth to Christianity. Yet, it is supposed to defeat terrorism now. There?s a lesson here."
"Larry" at Dag Blog commented:
"Perhaps Senator Siplin ... and Republican Senator Ronda Storms need a
quick refresher on the Bill of Rights. For their benefit let me give them some
brief tutelage: the government should not be in the business of sanctioning
religious paraphernalia. That is one of the things that separates America from
Islamo-Fascist nations. While Saudi Arabia has the declaration of faith on
it?s flag '(There is) no god but God. Muhammad (is the) messenger of God,' we
in America don?t. While Iran follows strict Islamic law that enforces sexual
apartheid, we in America don?t."
He proposed some alternate religious plates including:
An image of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. This is a rather
ugly creature that some Atheists suggest is as likely to exist as any of
thousands of gods and goddesses who have been worshipped by humans. We are not
too excited about this plate as it could
be a safety hazard. People might be
become fixated on the image and take their eyes off the road.
image of the Jedi religion from Star Wars.
The DamnedIfGodExists blog countered with another
Flying Spaghetti Monster plate. It at least has some text under the monster
containing the blog's URL and might clarify the plate's meaning to some folks:
Ultimately, the two Christian tag designs were not passed by the
legislature. The two religious plates were removed from the House bill, and the
House approved the remaining
secular plates 88 to 29. 4 The proposed
designs died when the legislature session ended on 2009-MAY-01.
Later in 2009-APR, Senator Siplin said
that he is considering trying again in the future. He plans to replace the Jesus image with the word "Trinity" and
perhaps "... a cross and some nails and a dove." A dove is a traditional
image of the Holy Spirit.
The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above
essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.