About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Your first visit?
Contact us
External links
Good books
Visitor essays
Our forum
New essays
Other site features
Buy a CD
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
.
CHRISTIANITY
Who is a Christian?
Shared beliefs
Handle change
Bible topics
Bible inerrancy
Bible harmony
Interpret Bible
Persons
Beliefs, creeds
Da Vinci code
Revelation, 666
Denominations
.
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Other spirituality
Cults and NRMs
Comparing religions

About all religions
Important topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handle change
Doubt/security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
World's end
One true religion?
Seasonal topics
Science v. Religion
More info.

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality/ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten commandm'ts
Abortion
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment
Equal rights - gays & bi's
Gay marriage
Nudism
Origins of the species
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking kids
Stem cells
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

Web site logo

Intersexual Genital Mutilation

In North America & Europe

horizontal rule

Click Here to Visit our Sponsors.

horizontal rule

Summary:

This is an invasive procedure that is usually performed on "inter-sex" newborns for what some believe to be medical reasons. These are newborns whose genitals deviate significantly from conventional male or female design.

Similar operations are traditionally performed on non-intersex girls later in life in some African, Middle Eastern and Far Eastern countries Aboriginal, Christian and Muslim families who have emigrated to the US or Canada also practice it.

horizontal rule

Genital alterations of infants:

Western society has traditionally oppressed sexual minorities. Every child is expected to be conceived with XX or XY chromosomes, grow up to be either a man or a woman, to have internal and external sexual organs which are clearly male or female, and to be sexually attracted to members of the "opposite" sex when they mature. For reasons of ignorance, religious teaching and fear, we have tended to force people into the traditional heterosexual male or female role. But, as in so many sexually related topics, a two-mode model is insufficient. Consider:

bulletHomosexuals: male or female adults who are attracted to members of the same gender; about 5% of the population
bulletBisexuals: male or female adults who are attracted to persons of both/all genders; about 3% of the population.
bulletTransgendered persons: male or female adults who appear like a typical male or female, but who are convinced that nature has played a terrible trick on them. They feel that they are a woman in a man's body, or vice versa. They are rare, numbering only one in every tens of thousands of individuals.
bulletTransexuals: Transgendered adults who have undergone hormone therapy and/or surgical procedures in order to make their body more closely resemble the sex that they believe they are.
bulletIntersexuals: individuals who are born with anatomy or physiology which differ from cultural ideals of male and female." 1

Anne Fausto-Sterling attempted to categorize intersexuality in a 1993 article. 2 She introduced three sexes in addition to male and female:

bulletHerm refers to "true hermaphrodite" -- a person born with both ovarian and testicular tissues and internal reproductive organs.
bulletMerm is an intersexed person with a XY (nominally male) karyotype.
bulletFerm is an intersexed person with a XX (nominally female) karyotype.

These categories have not been well received by most intersexed people.

She has written of her vision of a more accepting future:

"At birth, instead of hearing the inevitable pronouncement of "boy" or "girl" new parents might excitedly await a much expanded range of possibilities. Herms, ferms, and merms, being the rarer birth events might come to be seen as especially blessed or lucky, having as they do the best of all possible worlds, sexually speaking. Herms, merms and ferms might become the most desirable of all possible mates able as they are to pleasure their partners in a variety of ways. Furthermore, the existence of three additional sexes would open up possibilities for the rest of us. It would become difficult to maintain a clear conceptualization of homosexuality, for example, and perhaps its current contentious status would fade from view. If we envision the world in fives instead of twos, it would also be more difficult to hold onto rigid constructions of male and female sex roles. ...Should we have only two sexes?--my answer would be a resounding no."

Most physicians have recommended in the past that the ambiguous external genitals of intersex infants be carved up so that the child will grow up appearing to be a "normal" male or female. Some the infant have an enlarged or protruding clitoris; others will be born with a "micropenis". In about 90% of cases, intersex infants undergo genital surgery to make them appear as a "normal" female. One surgeon explained: "You can make a hole, but you can't build a pole." 3 Surgery involves removal and remolding genital structures, and may involve the addition of parts taken from elsewhere on the body. Physicians now attempt to preserve structures that have concentrations of nerves, so that sexual feeling will remain. But they cannot guarantee that their patients will ever be able to have orgasms in later life. Such care was not always done in the past.

These operations are usually performed shortly after birth, at the age of 6 weeks to 15 months. 6 They are sometimes done later, during childhood or teen years. There is increasing opposition to these operations. Several activist and support groups by and for intersexuals have been formed. 1,4,5 They generally oppose genital surgery on intersexual people, particularly when it is done at an age where the individual cannot make an informed choice. Nathalie Angier 6 has written:

"The debate raises difficult questions about who has the right to decide what ranks as esthetically acceptable genitalia, whose interests are being served by surgical intervention and whether one's sexual identity is so entwined with the appearance of one's genitals that it is worth subjecting infants to a major operation to assure visual concordance between one and the other."

The Federal Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act does permit genital surgery if it is "necessary to the health of the person on whom it is performed." Activists are now trying to modify the law, so that it cannot be performed without the informed consent of the individual. Cheryl Chase, founder of the Intersex Society of North America commented: 1

"Africans have their cultural reasons for trimming girls' clitorises, and we have our cultural reasons for trimming girls' clitorises. It's a lot easier to see what's irrational in another culture than it is to see it in our own."

With regard to the proposed change in the law, she commented: "

"That would break the pediatricians' argument that they do this to prevent psychological and mental trauma for the child...We don't expect this to be finished up in six months, but we're not going to go away, and we have more passion than they do."

Some pediatricians defend the practice of infant genital surgery. Dr. Anthony A. Caldamone, head of pediatric urology at Hasbro Children's Hospital in Providence, RI said:

"I don't think it's an option for nothing to be done. I don't think parents can be told, this is a normal girl, and then have to be faced with what looks like an enlarged clitoris, or a penis, every time they change the diaper. We try to normalize the genitals to the gender to reduce psychosocial and functional problems later in life."

Dr. Justine M. Schober, a pediatric urologist at Hamot Medical Center in Erie, Pa. has said:

"The truth is, genital surgery is being done, but we don't know what the outcome of it is, sexually or otherwise. We don't have any long-term studies."

David Thomas, a pediatric urologist at St. James's University Hospital and Infirmary in Leeds, UK conducted a scouting study. It involved only about a dozen intersexual individuals aged 11 to 15 who had been subjected to genital surgery. Results were not encouraging. 7 Dr. Thomas reports: "

"Every girl required some additional vaginal surgery...The results are indifferent and frankly disappointing."

Estimates on the number of intersexuals in North America range from 1 in 50 to 1 in 1000. Intersexuality is sometimes caused by genetics, sometimes by rare hormonal levels during pregnancy, and sometimes by unknown causes.

horizontal rule

Religious Attacks on Intersexuals:

One would hope that the unique challenges faced by intersexual individuals could be handled through an interaction of intersexuals, their families, physicians and other health professionals. Unfortunately, some conservative Christians have introduced religious objections to intersexuality, based on what they believe are literal interpretations of scripture. Some examples are listed below, along with responses from some liberal Christians and intersexed persons:

bulletGenesis 1:27 states: "God created man in his own image...male and female he created them." (NIV)
Many Conservative Christians interpret the verse (and similar Biblical passages) literally, and believe that there can be only two genders: male and female. If there were intersexual peoples, then God would have mentioned them. Thus, they reject the concept of gender as a continuum, with three or more varieties of intersexual genders.
bulletOne intersexual individual 8 cites an ancient Jewish tradition "that Adam was an hermaphrodite."
bulletMany Liberal Christian theologians interpret Genesis 1:27 to refer to God's original creation of Adam and Eve as male and female. It would not necessarly refer to their descendants, who would have been male, female and intersexual. Religious liberals usually consider the Old Testament creation story to be a myth, similar to the creation stories of other religions.
bulletNumbers 5:1-3 states: "The Lord said to Moses: 'Command the Israelites to send away from the camp anyone who has an infections skin disease or a discharge of any kind, or who is ceremonially unclean because of [touching] a dead body. Send away male and female alike; send them outside the camp so that they will not defile their camp, where I dwell among them.'" (NIV)
Many Conservative theologians point out that the phrase "male and female alike" is a way of including everyone. Thus, God has implied that there are no intersexuals.
bulletOne intersexual individual pointed out: "The phrase which tends translated as 'male and female'...reads 'mi-zakhar ve-'ad neqevah', or 'from male to female,' in the original Hebrew. The form 'from A to B' suggests a continuum of some sort." 8 The concept of male and female with three intermediate genders fits perfectly into the phrase in its original Hebrew. Numbers 5 appears to be one of many Biblical passages in which translators have created an English text that discriminates against minorities, even as the original Hebrew text is inclusive of all gender minorities.
bulletMany liberal theologians interpret this passage in a different way. The authors of the book of Numbers lived in a pre-scientific age and were unaware of sex chromosomes, hermaphrodites, intersexuals, and other sexual minorities. They would have naturally assumed that there were only two genders when they wrote this passages as if it had been stated by God.

Chuck Colson has written a particularly insensitive attack on intersexuals. He states (in part):

"The Bible teaches that the Fall into sin affected biology itself - that nature is now marred and distorted from its original perfection. This truth gives us a basis for fighting evil, for working to alleviate disease and deformity - including helping those unfortunate children born with genital deformities."

"...for the Christian, nature is not our basis for determining normality. Scripture tells us how God created us before the Fall, and how he intended us to live: as males and females, reflecting His own image. We take our standards and identity from His revelation of our original nature." 9

One cause of this attack on the reality of intersexuality is the desire by conservative Christians to delay as long as possible the recognition of gay and lesbian marriages. One method of continuing special rights for heterosexuals is the US Federal Defense of Marriage Act. DOMA has two main objectives:

bulletrestriction of the definition of "marriage" in federal legislation to unions between one male and one female,
bulletallowing states to refuse to recognize marriages performed in other states that do not involve one man and one woman.

If it is shown that there are more than 2 genders, then DOMA could be ruled unconstitutional. The US Supreme Court has already declared a Colorado amendment to be unconstitutional because it singled out one group (homosexuals) for legalized discrimination. DOMA could be interpreted as singling out two groups (homosexuals and intersexuals) for such discrimination.

Thus, it is important for groups that are opposing same-sex marriage to maintain the fiction that there are only two genders, that intersexual people do not exist.

It would be unfortunate if the hatred expressed against homosexuality by many conservative Christians spreads and becomes widely directed against intersexuals.

horizontal rule

References:

  1. The Intersex Society of North America maintains a home page at: http://www.isna.org/ They have a FAQ, which describes their newsletter and other materials on intersexuality.
  2. Anne Fausto-Sterling, "The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female are not enough", The Sciences, 1993-MAR/APR, 1993:20-24. Responses were printed in the JUL/AUG issue. The article was reprinted on the New York Times Op-ed page on 1993-MAR-12.
  3. Melissa Hendricks, "Is it a Boy or a Girl?", Johns Hopkins Magazine, 1993-NOV-10 to 16.
  4. Intersex Voices is a Web site supporting intersexual persons and their families. See: http://www.qis.net/~triea/inter.html (Apparently offline)
  5. Genital Mutilation Survivors' Support Network (GMSSN) has a German and English web site at: http://www.sonic.net/~boedeker/gmssn/index.htm [Apparently a broken link]
  6. Nathalie Angier, New Debate Over Surgery on Genitals, New York Times, New York NY, 1997-MAY-13
  7. Anne Scheck, "Early Vaginal Reconstruction for All Intersex Girls?," Urology Times of Canada, 1997-APR. Available at: http://www.doctoc.com/
  8. Sally Gross, "Intersexuality and Scripture" at: http://www.qis.net/ (Apparently offline)
  9. Charles Colson, "Blurred biology" is a Fundamentalist Christian attack on intersexuality. See: http://www.goodnewsmag.com/ Apparently offline
  10. Anne Fausto-Sterling, "The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female are not enough", The Sciences, 1993-MAR/APR, 1993:20-24. Responses were printed in the JUL/AUG issue. The article was reprinted on the New York Times Op-ed page on 1993-MAR-12.
  11. Cheryl Chase, "Hermaphrodites with Attitude: Mapping the Emergence of Intersex Political Activism," GLQ: Journal of Gay and Lesbian Studies 4 (2):189-211 (1998)
  12. A.D. Dreger, "Ethical Issues in the Medical Treatment of Intersexuality and 'Ambiguous Sex,'" Hastings Center Report. (1998-MAY/JUN)
  13. Suzanne Kessler,  "Lessons from the Intersexed," Rutgers University Press, (1998-AUG)

horizontal rule

See our news feed on women's issues.
It shows 20 current news items, and is updated every 15 minutes.

horizontal rule

Copyright © 1998 to 2007 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally published: 1998-MAR-16

Last updated on 2007-MAY-31
Author: Bruce A Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)

horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or go to the "FGM" menu, or go to the "Hot religious topics" menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org
Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?